Dosimetric and biologic intercomparison between electron and proton FLASH beams

被引:15
作者
Almeida, A. [1 ,2 ]
Togno, M. [3 ]
Ballesteros-Zebadua, P. [1 ,2 ,7 ]
Franco-Perez, J. [1 ,2 ]
Geyer, R. [4 ]
Schaefer, R. [3 ]
Petit, B. [1 ,2 ]
Grilj, V [6 ]
Meer, D. [3 ]
Safai, S. [3 ]
Lomax, T. [3 ]
Weber, D. C. [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Bailat, C. [6 ]
Psoroulas, S. [3 ]
Vozenin, Marie -Catherine [1 ,2 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Lausanne Univ Hosp, Radiat Oncol Serv, Lab Radiat Oncol, Dept Oncol,CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
[2] Univ Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
[3] Paul Scherrer Inst, Ctr Proton Therapy, CH-5323 Villigen, Switzerland
[4] Univ Bern, Bern Univ Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, lnselspital, Bern, Switzerland
[5] Univ Hosp Zurich, Dept Radiat Oncol, Zurich, Switzerland
[6] Lausanne Univ Hosp, IRA, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
[7] Inst Nacl Neurol & Neurocirugia MVS, Mexico City, DF, Mexico
[8] Univ Hosp Geneva, Radiat Therapy Serv, Radiotherapy & Radiobiol Sect, Geneva, Switzerland
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
FLASH; Intercomparison; Dosimetry; Neurocognition; Tumor response; DOSE-RATES; IRRADIATION; GLIOBLASTOMA;
D O I
10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109953
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and purpose: The FLASH effect has been validated in different preclinical experiments with electrons (eFLASH) and protons (pFLASH) operating at an average dose rate above 40 Gy/s. However, no systematic intercomparison of the FLASH effect produced by eFLASH vs. pFLASH has yet been performed and constitutes the aim of the present study. Materials and methods: The electron eRT6/Oriatron/CHUV/5.5 MeV and proton Gantry1/PSI/170 MeV were used to deliver conventional (0.1 Gy/s eCONV and pCONV) and FLASH (>= 110 Gy/s eFLASH and pFLASH) dose rates. Protons were delivered in transmission. Dosimetric and biologic intercomparisons were performed using previously validated dosimetric approaches and experimental murine models. Results: The difference between the average absorbed dose measured at Gantry 1 with PSI reference dosimeters and with CHUV/IRA dosimeters was -1.9 % (0.1 Gy/s) and + 2.5 % (110 Gy/s). The neurocognitive capacity of eFLASH and pFLASH irradiated mice was indistinguishable from the control, while both eCONV and pCONV irradiated cohorts showed cognitive decrements. Complete tumor response was obtained after an ablative dose of 20 Gy delivered with the two beams at CONV and FLASH dose rates. Tumor rejection upon rechallenge indicates that anti-tumor immunity was activated independently of the beam-type and the dose-rate. Conclusion: Despite major differences in the temporal microstructure of proton and electron beams, this study shows that dosimetric standards can be established. Normal brain protection and tumor control were produced by the two beams. More specifically, normal brain protection was achieved when a single dose of 10 Gy was delivered in 90 ms or less, suggesting that the most important physical parameter driving the FLASH sparing effect might be the mean dose rate. In addition, a systemic anti-tumor immunological memory response was observed in mice exposed to high ablative dose of electron and proton delivered at CONV and FLASH dose rate.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   Feasibility of proton FLASH effect tested by zebrafish embryo irradiation [J].
Beyreuther, Elke ;
Brand, Michael ;
Hans, Stefan ;
Hideghety, Katalin ;
Karsch, Leonhard ;
Lessmann, Elisabeth ;
Schuerer, Michael ;
Szabo, Emilia Rita ;
Pawelke, Jorg .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2019, 139 :46-50
[2]   Dose- and Volume-Limiting Late Toxicity of FLASH Radiotherapy in Cats with Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Nasal Planum and in Mini Pigs [J].
Bley, Carla Rohrer ;
Wolf, Friederike ;
Jorge, Patrik Goncalves ;
Grilj, Veljko ;
Petridis, Ioannis ;
Petit, Benoit ;
Boehlen, Till T. ;
Moeckli, Raphael ;
Limoli, Charles ;
Bourhis, Jean ;
Meier, Valeria ;
Vozenin, Marie-Catherine .
CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2022, 28 (17) :3814-3823
[3]  
Chen Y.S., 2022, Ther. Radiol. Oncol., V6, P14, DOI [10.21037/tro-22-16, DOI 10.21037/TRO-22-16]
[4]   Al2O3:C optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters (OSLDs) for ultra-high dose rate proton dosimetry [J].
Christensen, Jeppe Brage ;
Togno, Michele ;
Nesteruk, Konrad Pawel ;
Psoroulas, Serena ;
Meer, David ;
Weber, Damien Charles ;
Lomax, Tony ;
Yukihara, Eduardo G. ;
Safai, Sairos .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2021, 66 (08)
[5]   FLASH Proton Pencil Beam Scanning Irradiation Minimizes Radiation-Induced Leg Contracture and Skin Toxicity in Mice [J].
Cunningham, Shannon ;
McCauley, Shelby ;
Vairamani, Kanimozhi ;
Speth, Joseph ;
Girdhani, Swati ;
Abel, Eric ;
Sharma, Ricky A. ;
Perentesis, John P. ;
Wells, Susanne I. ;
Mascia, Anthony ;
Sertorio, Mathieu .
CANCERS, 2021, 13 (05) :1-15
[6]   Design, Implementation, and in Vivo Validation of a Novel Proton FLASH Radiation Therapy System [J].
Diffenderfer, Eric S. ;
Verginadis, Ioannis I. ;
Kim, Michele M. ;
Shoniyozov, Khayrullo ;
Velalopoulou, Anastasia ;
Goia, Denisa ;
Putt, Mary ;
Hagan, Sarah ;
Avery, Stephen ;
Teo, Kevin ;
Zou, Wei ;
Lin, Alexander ;
Swisher-McClure, Samuel ;
Koch, Cameron ;
Kennedy, Ann R. ;
Minn, Andy ;
Maity, Amit ;
Busch, Theresa M. ;
Dong, Lei ;
Koumenis, Costas ;
Metz, James ;
Cengel, Keith A. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2020, 106 (02) :440-448
[7]  
Drayson O. G. G., Methods in Cell Biology
[8]   Demonstration of the FLASH Effect Within the Spread-out Bragg Peak After Abdominal Irradiation of Mice [J].
Evans, Tucker ;
Cooley, James ;
Wagner, Miles ;
Yu, Tianning ;
Zwart, Townsend .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PARTICLE THERAPY, 2022, 8 (04) :68-75
[9]   Comparison of ultra-high versus conventional dose rate radiotherapy in a patient with cutaneous lymphoma [J].
Gaide, Olivier ;
Herrera, Fernanda ;
Sozzi, Wendy Jeanneret ;
Jorge, Patrik Goncalves ;
Kinj, Remy ;
Bailat, Claude ;
Duclos, Frederic ;
Bochud, Francois ;
Germond, Jean-Francois ;
Gondre, Maud ;
Boelhen, Till ;
Schiappacasse, Luis ;
Ozsahin, Mahmut ;
Moeckli, Raphael ;
Bourhis, Jean .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2022, 174 :87-91
[10]   The role of a microDiamond detector in the dosimetry of proton pencil beams [J].
Goma, Carles ;
Marinelli, Marco ;
Safai, Sairos ;
Verona-Rinati, Gianluca ;
Wuerfel, Jan .
ZEITSCHRIFT FUR MEDIZINISCHE PHYSIK, 2016, 26 (01) :88-94