Progress towards Sustainable Development Goals in the Belt and Road Initiative countries

被引:17
作者
Fang, Kai [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Xu, Anqi [1 ]
Wang, Siqi [1 ]
Jia, Xiaoping [5 ]
Liao, Zhongju [6 ]
Tan, Raymond R. [7 ]
Sun, Huaping [8 ]
Su, Fan [9 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Sch Publ Affairs, Hangzhou 310058, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Ecol Civilizat Acad, Anji 313300, Peoples R China
[3] Zhejiang Univ, Ctr Social Welf & Governance, Hangzhou 310058, Peoples R China
[4] Zhejiang Univ, Innovat Ctr Yangtze River Delta, Jiaxing 314100, Peoples R China
[5] Qingdao Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Environm & Safety Engn, Qingdao 266042, Peoples R China
[6] Zhejiang Sci Tech Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Hangzhou 310018, Peoples R China
[7] De La Salle Univ, Dept Chem Engn, Manila 0922, Philippines
[8] Jiangsu Univ, Inst Ind Econ, Zhenjiang 212013, Peoples R China
[9] Tsinghua Univ, Sch Publ Policy & Management, Beijing, Peoples R China
基金
国家重点研发计划;
关键词
Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs); SDG index (SDGI); Geospatial division and management; Belt and Road Initiative (BRI); ENVIRONMENTAL RISKS; CHINA; INDICATORS; UNDERSTAND; DESIGN; WILL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138808
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Studies have shown that monitoring the progress towards Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) provides a basis for evaluation of efforts in sustainable development and formulation of policy recommendations. The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) may have profound implications for the sustainable development of the involved countries. However, the performance of these countries with respect to the social, economic, and environmental dimensions of SDGs is yet to be explored. In this paper, we addressed this gap by analysing the progress towards SDGs during 2000-2019 on both the BRI and national scales by accounting for the social, economic, and environmental SDGs. We found that the BRI SDG index (SDGI), calculated by summing up the results from the three dimensions, increased from 43.5 in 2000 to 60.2 in 2019. Meanwhile, more than 90% of the BRI nations were at least halfway towards reaching the best performance of SDGs as of 2019. Of the 65 BRI nations, European countries generally performed better, while Central and West Asian countries performed relatively poorly ac-cording to the SDGI. Overall, the BRI showed high, medium, and low scores in achieving the economic, social, and environmental SDGs, respectively. In addition, the three dimensions have shown significant synergistic relationships over the past 20 years, although the synergies are weakening. Our research described the progress of BRI towards the SDGs, revealing that more attention should be paid to the environmental dimension, particularly to SDG 15 (life on land), as it received the lowest score and had the steepest downward trend of all SDGs. Considering the spatial heterogeneity among the BRI nations, we proposed a geospatial division and management plan as a potential measure to achieve SDGs.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 69 条
  • [1] Assessing national progress and priorities for the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): experience from Australia
    Allen, Cameron
    Reid, Michael
    Thwaites, John
    Glover, Rod
    Kestin, Tahl
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY SCIENCE, 2020, 15 (02) : 521 - 538
  • [2] Greater gains for Australia by tackling all SDGs but the last steps will be the most challenging
    Allen, Cameron
    Metternicht, Graciela
    Wiedmann, Thomas
    Pedercini, Matteo
    [J]. NATURE SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 2 (11) : 1041 - 1050
  • [3] Environmental challenges for the Belt and Road Initiative
    Ascensao, Fernando
    Fahrig, Lenore
    Clevenger, Anthony P.
    Corlett, Richard T.
    Jaeger, Jochen A. G.
    Laurance, William F.
    Pereira, Henrique M.
    [J]. NATURE SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 1 (05): : 206 - 209
  • [4] Utilizing geospatial information to implement SDGs and monitor their Progress
    Avtar, Ram
    Aggarwal, Ridhika
    Kharrazi, Ali
    Kumar, Pankaj
    Kurniawan, Tonni Agustiono
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2020, 192 (01)
  • [5] Deciphering the scienti fic literature on SDG interactions: A review and reading guide
    Bennich, Therese
    Weitz, Nina
    Carlsen, Henrik
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 728
  • [6] Will developing countries become pollution havens for developed countries? An empirical investigation in the Belt and Road
    Cai, Xiang
    Che, Xiahui
    Zhu, Bangzhu
    Zhao, Juan
    Xie, Rui
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 198 : 624 - 632
  • [7] Tracking national sustainability of critical natural capital and the socioeconomic drivers in the context of the Belt and Road Initiative
    Chen, Xianpeng
    Liu, Qingyan
    Fang, Kai
    He, Jianjian
    Chen, Yang
    Wang, Tingting
    Fang, Chuanglin
    Shen, Yang
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2020, 114
  • [8] Costanza, 2014, SOLUTIONS, V5, P13
  • [9] Modelling and measuring sustainable wellbeing in connection with the UN Sustainable Development Goals
    Costanza, Robert
    Daly, Lew
    Fioramonti, Lorenzo
    Giovannini, Enrico
    Kubiszewski, Ida
    Mortensen, Lars Fogh
    Pickett, Kate E.
    Ragnarsdottir, Kristin Vala
    De Vogli, Roberto
    Wilkinson, Richard
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2016, 130 : 350 - 355
  • [10] Mapping Sustainable Development Goals: A network analysis framework
    Dalampira, Evropi-Sofia
    Nastis, Stefanos A.
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2020, 28 (01) : 46 - 55