Increasing practice and acceptable outcomes of high-MELD living donor liver transplantation in the USA

被引:1
|
作者
Anouti, Ahmad [1 ]
Patel, Madhukar S. [2 ]
Vanwagner, Lisa B. [1 ]
Lee, William M. [1 ]
Asrani, Sumeet K. [3 ]
Mufti, Arjmand R. [1 ]
Rich, Nicole E. [1 ]
Vagefi, Parsia A. [2 ]
Shah, Jigesh A. [2 ]
Kerr, Thomas A. [1 ]
Pedersen, Mark [1 ]
Hanish, Steven [2 ]
Singal, Amit G. [1 ]
Cotter, Thomas G. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] UT Southwestern Med Ctr, Div Digest & Liver Dis, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
[2] UT Southwestern Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
[3] Baylor Univ, Med Ctr, Dallas, TX USA
[4] UT Southwestern Med Ctr, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
关键词
DISEASE SCORE; ADULT; AGE; IMPACT; LOBE; MODEL; RECIPIENTS; SAFETY; GRAFT;
D O I
10.1097/LVT.0000000000000228
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Recent deceased-donor allocation changes in the United States may have increased high-Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) living donor liver transplantation (LDLT); however, outcomes in these patients remain poorly defined. We aimed to examine the impact of the MELD score on LDLT outcomes. Using UNOS data (January 1, 2010-December 31, 2021), LDLT recipients were identified and stratified into low-MELD (<15), intermediate-MELD (15-24), and high-MELD (=25) groups. We compared outcomes between MELD-stratified LDLT groups and between MELD-stratified LDLT and donation after brain death liver transplantation recipients. We used Kaplan-Meier analysis to compare graft survival rates and multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling to identify factors associated with graft outcomes. Of 3558 LDLTs, 1605 (45.1%) were low-MELD, 1616 (45.4%) intermediate-MELD, and 337 (9.5%) high-MELD. Over the study period, the annual number of LDLTs increased from 282 to 569, and the proportion of high-MELD LDLTs increased from 3.9% to 7.7%. Graft survival was significantly higher in low-MELD versus high-MELD LDLT recipients (adjusted HR = 1.36, 95% CI: 1.03-1.79); however, 5-year survival exceeded 70.0% in both groups. We observed no significant difference in graft survival between high-MELD LDLT and high-MELD donation after brain death liver transplantation recipients (adjusted HR: 1.25, 95% CI:0.99-1.58), with a 5-year survival of 71.5% and 77.3%, respectively. Low LDLT center volume (<3 LDLTs/year) and recipient life support requirement were both associated with inferior graft outcomes among high-MELD LDLT recipients. While higher MELD scores confer graft failure risk in LDLT, high-MELD LDLT outcomes are acceptable with similar outcomes to MELD-stratified donation after brain death liver transplantation recipients. Future practice guidance should consider the expansion of LDLT recommendations to high-MELD recipients in centers with expertise to help reduce donor shortage.
引用
收藏
页码:72 / 82
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Living Donor Liver Transplantation for Adults With High Model for End-stage Liver Disease Score: The US Experience
    Rosenthal, Benjamin E.
    Abt, Peter L.
    Schaubel, Douglas E.
    Reddy, K. Rajender
    Bittermann, Therese
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2024, 108 (03) : 713 - 723
  • [42] Outcomes of Patients with Benign Liver Diseases Undergoing Living Donor versus Deceased Donor Liver Transplantation
    Li, Chuan
    Mi, Kai
    Wen, Tian Fu
    Yan, Lu Nan
    Li, Bo
    Yang, Jia Ying
    Xu, Ming Qing
    Wang, Wen Tao
    Wei, Yong Gang
    PLOS ONE, 2011, 6 (11):
  • [43] Application of percutaneous liver biopsy in living donor liver transplantation
    Chiu, King-Wah
    Eng, Hock-Liew
    Cheng, Yu-Fan
    Jawan, Bruno
    Chen, Chao-Long
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2018, 11 (10): : 10372 - 10379
  • [44] Impact of sarcopenic overweight on the outcomes after living donor liver transplantation
    Hammad, Ahmed
    Kaido, Toshimi
    Hamaguchi, Yuhei
    Okumura, Shinya
    Kobayashi, Atsushi
    Shirai, Hisaya
    Kamo, Naoko
    Yagi, Shintaro
    Uemoto, Shinji
    HEPATOBILIARY SURGERY AND NUTRITION, 2017, 6 (06) : 367 - 378
  • [45] Recipient Outcomes with Younger Donors Undergoing Living Donor Liver Transplantation
    Dar, Faisal S.
    Khan, Nusrat Y.
    Ali, Rubab
    Khokhar, Hamzah Khawar
    Zia, Haseeb H.
    Bhatti, Abu Bakar H.
    Shah, Najmul H.
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2019, 11 (03)
  • [46] Is living donor liver transplantation really equivalent to deceased donor liver transplantation?
    Ohdan, Hideki
    TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 26 (08) : 778 - 779
  • [47] Living donor liver transplantation for HCV: Will the true outcomes stand up?
    Brown, Robert S., Jr.
    JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 2012, 57 (06) : 1166 - 1167
  • [48] Living Donor Liver Transplantation in Patients Older Than 60 Years
    Yoshizumi, Tomoharu
    Shirabe, Ken
    Soejima, Yuji
    Taketomi, Akinobu
    Yamashita, Natsumi
    Ikegami, Toru
    Uchiyama, Hideaki
    Kayashima, Hiroto
    Ninomiya, Mizuki
    Maehara, Yoshihiko
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2010, 90 (04) : 433 - 437
  • [49] Operative outcomes of adult living donor liver transplantation and deceased donor liver transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wan, Ping
    Yu, Xin
    Xia, Qiang
    LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2014, 20 (04) : 425 - 436
  • [50] Current status of adult liver transplantation: utilization of living donor versus deceased donor graft
    Tran, Lillian
    Humar, Abhinav
    CURRENT OPINION IN ORGAN TRANSPLANTATION, 2021, 26 (02) : 133 - 138