Increasing practice and acceptable outcomes of high-MELD living donor liver transplantation in the USA

被引:1
|
作者
Anouti, Ahmad [1 ]
Patel, Madhukar S. [2 ]
Vanwagner, Lisa B. [1 ]
Lee, William M. [1 ]
Asrani, Sumeet K. [3 ]
Mufti, Arjmand R. [1 ]
Rich, Nicole E. [1 ]
Vagefi, Parsia A. [2 ]
Shah, Jigesh A. [2 ]
Kerr, Thomas A. [1 ]
Pedersen, Mark [1 ]
Hanish, Steven [2 ]
Singal, Amit G. [1 ]
Cotter, Thomas G. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] UT Southwestern Med Ctr, Div Digest & Liver Dis, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
[2] UT Southwestern Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
[3] Baylor Univ, Med Ctr, Dallas, TX USA
[4] UT Southwestern Med Ctr, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
关键词
DISEASE SCORE; ADULT; AGE; IMPACT; LOBE; MODEL; RECIPIENTS; SAFETY; GRAFT;
D O I
10.1097/LVT.0000000000000228
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Recent deceased-donor allocation changes in the United States may have increased high-Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) living donor liver transplantation (LDLT); however, outcomes in these patients remain poorly defined. We aimed to examine the impact of the MELD score on LDLT outcomes. Using UNOS data (January 1, 2010-December 31, 2021), LDLT recipients were identified and stratified into low-MELD (<15), intermediate-MELD (15-24), and high-MELD (=25) groups. We compared outcomes between MELD-stratified LDLT groups and between MELD-stratified LDLT and donation after brain death liver transplantation recipients. We used Kaplan-Meier analysis to compare graft survival rates and multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling to identify factors associated with graft outcomes. Of 3558 LDLTs, 1605 (45.1%) were low-MELD, 1616 (45.4%) intermediate-MELD, and 337 (9.5%) high-MELD. Over the study period, the annual number of LDLTs increased from 282 to 569, and the proportion of high-MELD LDLTs increased from 3.9% to 7.7%. Graft survival was significantly higher in low-MELD versus high-MELD LDLT recipients (adjusted HR = 1.36, 95% CI: 1.03-1.79); however, 5-year survival exceeded 70.0% in both groups. We observed no significant difference in graft survival between high-MELD LDLT and high-MELD donation after brain death liver transplantation recipients (adjusted HR: 1.25, 95% CI:0.99-1.58), with a 5-year survival of 71.5% and 77.3%, respectively. Low LDLT center volume (<3 LDLTs/year) and recipient life support requirement were both associated with inferior graft outcomes among high-MELD LDLT recipients. While higher MELD scores confer graft failure risk in LDLT, high-MELD LDLT outcomes are acceptable with similar outcomes to MELD-stratified donation after brain death liver transplantation recipients. Future practice guidance should consider the expansion of LDLT recommendations to high-MELD recipients in centers with expertise to help reduce donor shortage.
引用
收藏
页码:72 / 82
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Living donor liver transplantation in the USA
    Kim, Peter T. W.
    Testa, Giuliano
    HEPATOBILIARY SURGERY AND NUTRITION, 2016, 5 (02) : 133 - 140
  • [2] High MELD score does not adversely affect outcome of living donor liver transplantation: Experience in 1000 recipients
    Yadav, Sanjay K.
    Saraf, Neeraj
    Saigal, Sanjiv
    Choudhary, Narendra S.
    Goja, Sanjay
    Rastogi, Amit
    Bhangui, Prashant
    Soin, Arvinder S.
    CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2017, 31 (08)
  • [3] Outcomes of living donor liver transplantation using elderly donors
    Han, Jae Hyun
    You, Young Kyoung
    Na, Gun Hyung
    Kim, Eun Young
    Lee, Soo Ho
    Hong, Tae Ho
    Kim, Dong Goo
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL TREATMENT AND RESEARCH, 2014, 86 (04) : 184 - 191
  • [4] Delta MELD as a predictor of early outcome in adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation
    Acar, Sencan
    Akyildiz, Murat
    Gurakar, Ahmet
    Tokat, Yaman
    Dayangac, Murat
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2020, 31 (11) : 782 - 789
  • [5] Split-liver transplantation in the high-MELD adult patient: are we being too cautious?
    Nadalin, Silvio
    Schaffer, Randolph
    Fruehauf, Nils
    TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 22 (07) : 702 - 706
  • [6] Outcomes of Living Donor Liver Transplantation Compared with Deceased Donor Liver Transplantation
    Tulla, Kiara A.
    Tinney Jr, Francis J.
    Cameron, Andrew M.
    SURGICAL CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2024, 104 (01) : 79 - 88
  • [7] A high MELD score, combined with the presence of hepatitis C, is associated with a poor prognosis in living donor liver transplantation
    Ikegami, Toru
    Shirabe, Ken
    Yoshiya, Shohei
    Yoshizumi, Tomoharu
    Yamashita, Yo-ichi
    Harimoto, Norifumi
    Toshima, Takeo
    Uchiyama, Hideaki
    Soejima, Yuji
    Maehara, Yoshihiko
    SURGERY TODAY, 2014, 44 (02) : 233 - 240
  • [8] Living donor liver transplantation for obese patients: Challenges and outcomes
    Gunay, Yusuf
    Guler, Necdet
    Dayangac, Murat
    Taskesen, Fatih
    Yaprak, Onur
    Emek, Ertan
    Akyildiz, Murat
    Altaca, Gulum
    Yuzer, Yildiray
    Tokat, Yaman
    LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2014, 20 (03) : 311 - 322
  • [9] Waiting time, not donor-risk-index, is a major determinant for beneficial outcome after liver transplantation in high-MELD patients
    Rauchfuss, Falk
    Zidan, Ahmed
    Scheuerlein, Hubert
    Dittmar, Yves
    Bauschke, Astrid
    Settmacher, Utz
    ANNALS OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2013, 18 : 243 - 247
  • [10] Living donor liver transplantation in adults in the MELD era in Germany - a multi-center retrospective analysis
    Settmacher, Utz
    Goetz, Max
    Rahmel, Axel
    Baerthel, Erik
    Schlitt, Hans
    Puhl, Gero
    Broering, Dieter
    Lehner, Frank
    Fischer, Lutz
    Paul, Andreas
    Schmidt, Jan
    Nadalin, Silvio
    Obed, Aiman
    Heise, Michael
    TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 24 (09) : 904 - 911