共 50 条
Relationship of Histopathologic Parameters and Gene Expression Profiling in Malignant Melanoma
被引:0
|作者:
Strahan, Alexis G.
[1
]
Svagelj, Ivan
[2
]
Jukic, Drazen
[3
,4
,5
]
机构:
[1] Mercer Univ, Sch Med, Savannah, GA USA
[2] Gen Cty Hosp Vinkovci, Dept Pathol & Cytol, Vinkovci, Croatia
[3] Mercer Univ, Dept Pathol & Clin Sci Educ, Sch Med, 900 Mohawk St suite E, Savannah, GA 31419 USA
[4] Georgia Dermatopathol, Savannah, GA 31405 USA
[5] Univ Florida, Dept Dermatol, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
关键词:
D O I:
10.1007/s40257-023-00815-2
中图分类号:
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号:
100206 ;
摘要:
BackgroundHistopathologic characteristics (HC) are a mainstay in melanoma prognosis; gene expression profiling (GEP) has emerged as a potential additional independent value.ObjectiveTo elucidate HC predictive of groups obtained via GEP of malignant melanoma.MethodsA retrospective study analyzing HC of 265 melanomas submitted for GEP over the course of 8 years. GEP was conducted as a part of regular clinicopathologic workup through Castle Biosciences Decision Dx & REG;.ResultsOf the 265 cases, the major HC found to have an association with reported gene expression profiles were melanoma histology subtype, depth of invasion, and presence of ulcer.LimitationsThis study is limited by its cross-sectional nature. Causation and long-term related outcomes of the use of GEP versus American Joint Committee on Cancer histopathologic staging cannot be ascertained by this design.ConclusionsAn association, but no definitive prediction, exists between histopathologic categories of depth of invasion, melanoma subtype, and presence or absence of ulcer and gene expression profiles. GEP adds valuable data to the evaluation of malignant melanomas that cannot be definitively predicted by conventional models. The findings add to needed groundwork for comparison of traditional markers and molecular genotyping and begins to build a robust predictive model for better outcomes in patients with malignant melanoma.
引用
收藏
页码:119 / 126
页数:8
相关论文