Nonconvulsive status epilepticus in neurocritical care: A critical reappraisal of outcome prediction scores

被引:3
作者
Bogli, Stefan Y. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Schmidt, Tanja [1 ,2 ]
Imbach, Lukas L. [4 ]
Nellessen, Friederike [1 ,2 ]
Brandi, Giovanna [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zurich, Univ Hosp Zurich, Inst Intens Care Med, Neurocrit Care Unit, Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Univ Zurich, Univ Hosp Zurich, Dept Neurosurg, Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Univ Zurich, Univ Hosp Zurich, Clin Neurosci Ctr, Dept Neurol, Zurich, Switzerland
[4] Klin Lengg, Swiss Epilepsy Ctr, Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
neurocritical care; nonconvulsive status epilepticus; outcome prediction scores; CONVULSIVE STATUS EPILEPTICUS; MORTALITY SCORE; CLINICAL SCORE; PROGNOSIS; ICU; MORBIDITY; SEIZURES;
D O I
10.1111/epi.17708
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
ObjectiveNonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) is a frequent condition in the neurocritical care unit (NCCU) patient population, with high morbidity and mortality. We aimed to assess the validity of available outcome prediction scores for prognostication in an NCCU patient population in relation to their admission reason (NCSE vs. non-NCSE related). MethodsAll 196 consecutive patients diagnosed with NCSE during the NCCU stay between January 2010 and December 2020 were included. Demographics, Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS II), NCSE characteristics, and in-hospital and 3-month outcome were extracted from the electronic charts. Status Epilepticus Severity Score (STESS), Epidemiology-Based Mortality Score in Status Epilepticus (EMSE), and encephalitis, NCSE, diazepam resistance, imaging features, and tracheal intubation score (END-IT) were evaluated as previously described. Univariable and multivariable analysis and comparison of sensitivity/specificity/positive and negative predictive values/accuracy were performed. ResultsA total of 30.1% died during the hospital stay, and 63.5% of survivors did not achieve favorable outcome at 3 months after onset of NCSE. Patients admitted primarily due to NCSE had longer NCSE duration and were more likely to be intubated at diagnosis. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) for SAPS II, EMSE, and STESS when predicting mortality was between .683 and .762. The ROC for SAPS II, EMSE, STESS, and END-IT when predicting 3-month outcome was between .649 and .710. The accuracy in predicting mortality/outcome was low, when considering both proposed cutoffs and optimized cutoffs (estimated using the Youden Index) as well as when adjusting for admission reason. SignificanceThe scores EMSE, STESS, and END-IT perform poorly when predicting outcome of patients with NCSE in an NCCU environment. They should be interpreted cautiously and only in conjunction with other clinical data in this particular patient group.
引用
收藏
页码:2409 / 2420
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Outcome of status epilepticus and the predictive value of the EMSE and STESS scores: A prospective study
    Sairanen, Joni J.
    Kantanen, Anne-Mari
    Hyppola, Harri T.
    Kalviainen, Reetta K.
    SEIZURE-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPILEPSY, 2020, 75 : 115 - 120
  • [32] Critical Care Management of Status Epilepticus at a Tertiary Care University Hospital
    Mahmoud, Sherif Hanafy
    Marette, Vanessa
    Lindqvist, Therecia
    Ahmed, S. Nizam
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2019, 46 (06) : 702 - 710
  • [33] Nonconvulsive status epilepticus in patients under intensive care: Should we view epilepsy as a sleep disorder?
    Gelisse, Philippe
    Crespel, Arielle
    EPILEPSIA, 2025,
  • [34] Outcome of status epilepticus in children treated in the intensive care unit: A study of 302 cases
    Kravljanac, Ruzica
    Jovic, Nebojsa
    Djuric, Milena
    Jankovic, Borisav
    Pekmezovic, Tatjana
    EPILEPSIA, 2011, 52 (02) : 358 - 363
  • [35] Zebras Seize the Day Rare Causes of Status Epilepticus Across the Continuum of Critical Care
    Harrar, Dana
    Mondok, Lileth
    Adams, Samuel
    Farias-Moeller, Raquel
    CRITICAL CARE CLINICS, 2022, 38 (02) : 349 - 373
  • [36] Characteristics and role in outcome prediction of continuous EEG after status epilepticus: A prospective observational cohort
    Alvarez, Vincent
    Drislane, Frank W.
    Westover, M. Brandon
    Dworetzky, Barbara A.
    Lee, Jong Woo
    EPILEPSIA, 2015, 56 (06) : 933 - 941
  • [37] Super refractory status epilepticus: the development of a paradigm for critical care management
    Turnbull, D.
    Singatullina, N.
    MINERVA ANESTESIOLOGICA, 2013, 79 (05) : 541 - 553
  • [38] Outcome prediction in critical care: the ICNARC model
    Harrison, David A.
    Rowan, Kathryn M.
    CURRENT OPINION IN CRITICAL CARE, 2008, 14 (05) : 506 - 512
  • [39] Nonconvulsive status epilepticus with frontal features: quantitating severity of subclinical epileptiform discharges provides a marker for treatment efficacy, recurrence and outcome
    Licht, EA
    Fujikawa, DG
    EPILEPSY RESEARCH, 2002, 51 (1-2) : 13 - 21
  • [40] Admission patterns and survival from status epilepticus in critical care in the UK: an analysis of the Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre Case Mix Programme database
    Damian, M. S.
    Ben-Shlomo, Y.
    Howard, R.
    Harrison, D. A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2020, 27 (03) : 557 - 564