Nonconvulsive status epilepticus in neurocritical care: A critical reappraisal of outcome prediction scores

被引:3
|
作者
Bogli, Stefan Y. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Schmidt, Tanja [1 ,2 ]
Imbach, Lukas L. [4 ]
Nellessen, Friederike [1 ,2 ]
Brandi, Giovanna [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zurich, Univ Hosp Zurich, Inst Intens Care Med, Neurocrit Care Unit, Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Univ Zurich, Univ Hosp Zurich, Dept Neurosurg, Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Univ Zurich, Univ Hosp Zurich, Clin Neurosci Ctr, Dept Neurol, Zurich, Switzerland
[4] Klin Lengg, Swiss Epilepsy Ctr, Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
neurocritical care; nonconvulsive status epilepticus; outcome prediction scores; CONVULSIVE STATUS EPILEPTICUS; MORTALITY SCORE; CLINICAL SCORE; PROGNOSIS; ICU; MORBIDITY; SEIZURES;
D O I
10.1111/epi.17708
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
ObjectiveNonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) is a frequent condition in the neurocritical care unit (NCCU) patient population, with high morbidity and mortality. We aimed to assess the validity of available outcome prediction scores for prognostication in an NCCU patient population in relation to their admission reason (NCSE vs. non-NCSE related). MethodsAll 196 consecutive patients diagnosed with NCSE during the NCCU stay between January 2010 and December 2020 were included. Demographics, Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS II), NCSE characteristics, and in-hospital and 3-month outcome were extracted from the electronic charts. Status Epilepticus Severity Score (STESS), Epidemiology-Based Mortality Score in Status Epilepticus (EMSE), and encephalitis, NCSE, diazepam resistance, imaging features, and tracheal intubation score (END-IT) were evaluated as previously described. Univariable and multivariable analysis and comparison of sensitivity/specificity/positive and negative predictive values/accuracy were performed. ResultsA total of 30.1% died during the hospital stay, and 63.5% of survivors did not achieve favorable outcome at 3 months after onset of NCSE. Patients admitted primarily due to NCSE had longer NCSE duration and were more likely to be intubated at diagnosis. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) for SAPS II, EMSE, and STESS when predicting mortality was between .683 and .762. The ROC for SAPS II, EMSE, STESS, and END-IT when predicting 3-month outcome was between .649 and .710. The accuracy in predicting mortality/outcome was low, when considering both proposed cutoffs and optimized cutoffs (estimated using the Youden Index) as well as when adjusting for admission reason. SignificanceThe scores EMSE, STESS, and END-IT perform poorly when predicting outcome of patients with NCSE in an NCCU environment. They should be interpreted cautiously and only in conjunction with other clinical data in this particular patient group.
引用
收藏
页码:2409 / 2420
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Mortality, morbidity and refractoriness prediction in status epilepticus: Comparison of STESS and EMSE scores
    Giovannini, Giada
    Monti, Giulia
    Tondelli, Manuela
    Marudi, Andrea
    Valzania, Franco
    Leitinger, Markus
    Trinka, Eugen
    Meletti, Stefano
    SEIZURE-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPILEPSY, 2017, 46 : 31 - 37
  • [22] High prevalence of nonconvulsive and subtle status epilepticus in an ICU of a tertiary care center: A three-year observational cohort study
    Rudin, Diana
    Grize, Leticia
    Schindler, Christian
    Marsch, Stephan
    Rueegg, Stephan
    Sutter, Raoul
    EPILEPSY RESEARCH, 2011, 96 (1-2) : 140 - 150
  • [23] The Ketogenic Diet for Medically and Surgically Refractory Status Epilepticus in the Neurocritical Care Unit
    Mackenzie C. Cervenka
    Adam L. Hartman
    Arun Venkatesan
    Romergryko G. Geocadin
    Eric H. Kossoff
    Neurocritical Care, 2011, 15 : 519 - 524
  • [24] Advancements in the critical care management of status epilepticus
    Bauerschmidt, Andrew
    Martin, Andrew
    Claassen, Jan
    CURRENT OPINION IN CRITICAL CARE, 2017, 23 (02) : 122 - 127
  • [25] Prediction of mortality and functional outcome from status epilepticus and independent external validation of STESS and EMSE scores
    Kang, Bong Su
    Kim, Dong Wook
    Kim, Kwang Ki
    Moon, Hye Jin
    Kim, Young-Soo
    Kim, Hyun Kyung
    Lee, Seo-Young
    Koo, Yong Seo
    Shin, Jung-Won
    Moon, Jangsup
    Sunwoo, Jun-Sang
    Byun, Jung-Ick
    Cho, Yong Won
    Jung, Ki-Young
    Chu, Kon
    Lee, Sang Kun
    CRITICAL CARE, 2016, 20
  • [26] The Clinical Features and Prognosis of Patients With Nonconvulsive Status Epilepticus in the Neurological Intensive Care Unit of a Tertiary Referral Center in Turkey
    Dericioglu, Nese
    Arsava, Ethem Murat
    Topcuoglu, Mehmet Akif
    CLINICAL EEG AND NEUROSCIENCE, 2014, 45 (04) : 293 - 298
  • [27] Prediction of functional outcome in patients with convulsive status epilepticus: the END-IT score
    Gao, Qiong
    Ou-Yang, Tang-peng
    Sun, Xiao-long
    Yang, Feng
    Wu, Chen
    Kang, Tao
    Kang, Xiao-gang
    Jiang, Wen
    CRITICAL CARE, 2016, 20
  • [28] Time to Detection of the First Seizure in Patients With Nonconvulsive Status Epilepticus in the Neurological Intensive Care Unit
    Dericioglu, Nese
    Arsava, Ethem Murat
    Topcuoglu, Mehmet Akif
    CLINICAL EEG AND NEUROSCIENCE, 2020, 51 (01) : 70 - 73
  • [29] Outcome of pediatric status epilepticus admitted to intensive care
    Parsons, SJ
    Tomas, K
    Cox, P
    JOURNAL OF INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2002, 17 (04) : 174 - 179
  • [30] Development of a novel outcome prediction score (PEDSS) for pediatric convulsive status epilepticus: A longitudinal observational study
    Tiwari, Richa
    Chakrabarty, Biswaroop
    Gulati, Sheffali
    Jauhari, Prashant
    Lodha, Rakesh
    Sankar, Jhuma
    Kumar, Atin
    Pandey, Ravindra Mohan
    Upadhyay, Ashish
    Gupta, Juhi
    Sinha, Rahul
    EPILEPSIA, 2020, 61 (12) : 2763 - 2773