Limited environmental and yield benefits of intercropping practices in smallholder fields: Evidence from multi-source data

被引:7
作者
Li, Chengxiu [1 ,2 ]
Kambombe, Oscar [3 ]
Chimimba, Ellasy Gulule [3 ,4 ]
Fawcett, Dominic [5 ]
Brown, Luke A. [2 ,6 ]
Yu, Le [1 ]
Gadedjisso-Tossou, Agossou [7 ]
Dash, Jadunandan [2 ]
机构
[1] Tsinghua Univ, Inst Global Change Studies, Dept Earth Syst Sci, Minist Educ,Key Lab Earth Syst Modeling, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Southampton, Sch Geog & Environm Sci, Southampton SO17 1BJ, England
[3] Univ Malawi, Sch Nat & Appl Sci, POB 280, Zomba, Malawi
[4] Malawi Univ Sci & Technol, Ndata Sch Climate & Earth Sci, POB 5196, Limbe, Malawi
[5] Univ Exeter, Coll Life & Environm Sci, Exeter EX4 4RJ, England
[6] Univ Salford, Sch Sci Engn & Environm, Manchester M5 4WT, England
[7] AGRHYMET Reg Ctr, Niamey, Niger
基金
英国科研创新办公室;
关键词
Yield; Sub-Saharan Africa; Agrochemical inputs; Satellite data; Monocultures; Labor inputs; Drought index; SUSTAINABLE INTENSIFICATION; CONSERVATION AGRICULTURE; LAND DEGRADATION; SOIL; DETERMINANTS; SYSTEMS; AFRICA; BIODIVERSITY; REVOLUTION; FARMERS;
D O I
10.1016/j.fcr.2023.108974
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Context: To ensure food security in sub-Saharan Africa, it is necessary to improve crop yields while minimizing environmental impacts. Intercropping has been demonstrated to deliver such outcomes, but their performance in smallholder fields has received limited attention therefore insufficient to capture the complexity of real-world crop fields run by smallholder farmers.Objective: This study examines the benefits and management of intercropping practices in real smallholder fields in Malawi.Methods: We collected field data on intercrop types, the number of intercropped species and maize yield in intercropped maize fields. Field data was then combined with geospatial and household survey data to inves-tigate the yield benefits, agricultural inputs, and factors related to intercropping choices. We used Pearson correlation and Tukey's test to test the statistical significance in the difference between intercropped fields and monoculture fields.Results: We found that more intercrops were planted in fields with smaller sizes, drier conditions, and higher soil erosion levels, with adoption rates increasing from 75 % in 2010 to 84 % in 2020. In addition, our field data shows that intercropping is associated with reduced primary maize yield (2.7 t/ha) compared to pure maize yield (3.8 t/ha). Conversely, satellite data demonstrates an improvement in overall field yield in intercropped fields. Meanwhile, intercropped fields require higher labor inputs (11 h more per season) and increased weeding times than monocultures, however agrochemical inputs (fertilizers and pesticides) do not necessarily decrease in intercropped fields compared to monocultures.Conclusions: Our results suggest that while smallholder farmers in Malawi adopt intercropping to improve land use efficiency, drought resilience, and soil fertility, they are not realizing the full benefits observed in experi-mental trials.Implications: More evidence on the benefits and best practices of intercropping in smallholder fields is necessary in order to better understand this practice as an option for sustainable intensification.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]   Data Descriptor: TerraClimate, a high-resolution global dataset of monthly climate and climatic water balance from 1958-2015 [J].
Abatzoglou, John T. ;
Dobrowski, Solomon Z. ;
Parks, Sean A. ;
Hegewisch, Katherine C. .
SCIENTIFIC DATA, 2018, 5
[2]   DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION OF A LOW-COST PROBE-TYPE INSTRUMENT TO MEASURE THE EQUILIBRIUM MOISTURE CONTENT OF GRAIN [J].
Armstrong, P. R. ;
McNeil, S. G. ;
Manu, N. ;
Bosomtwe, A. ;
Danso, J. K. ;
Osekre, E. ;
Opit, G. .
APPLIED ENGINEERING IN AGRICULTURE, 2017, 33 (05) :619-627
[3]   Understanding the Requirements for Surveys to Support Satellite-Based Crop Type Mapping: Evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa [J].
Azzari, George ;
Jain, Shruti ;
Jeffries, Graham ;
Kilic, Talip ;
Murray, Siobhan .
REMOTE SENSING, 2021, 13 (23)
[4]   Land degradation and poverty [J].
Barbier, Edward B. ;
Hochard, Jacob P. .
NATURE SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 1 (11) :623-631
[5]   Evidence map of crop diversification strategies at the global scale [J].
Beillouin, Damien ;
Ben-Ari, Tamara ;
Makowski, David .
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2019, 14 (12)
[6]   Improving intercropping: a synthesis of research in agronomy, plant physiology and ecology [J].
Brooker, Rob W. ;
Bennett, Alison E. ;
Cong, Wen-Feng ;
Daniell, Tim J. ;
George, Timothy S. ;
Hallett, Paul D. ;
Hawes, Cathy ;
Iannetta, Pietro P. M. ;
Jones, Hamlyn G. ;
Karley, Alison J. ;
Li, Long ;
McKenzie, Blair M. ;
Pakeman, Robin J. ;
Paterson, Eric ;
Schoeb, Christian ;
Shen, Jianbo ;
Squire, Geoff ;
Watson, Christine A. ;
Zhang, Chaochun ;
Zhang, Fusuo ;
Zhang, Junling ;
White, Philip J. .
NEW PHYTOLOGIST, 2015, 206 (01) :107-117
[7]   Satellite-based assessment of yield variation and its determinants in smallholder African systems [J].
Burke, Marshall ;
Lobell, David B. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2017, 114 (09) :2189-2194
[8]   From Tragedy to Renaissance: Improving Agricultural Data for Better Policies [J].
Carletto, Calogero ;
Jolliffe, Dean ;
Banerjee, Raka .
JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT STUDIES, 2015, 51 (02) :133-148
[9]   Strengthening Conservation Agriculture innovation systems in sub-Saharan Africa: lessons from a stakeholder analysis [J].
Chinseu, Edna L. ;
Dougill, Andrew J. ;
Stringer, Lindsay C. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 20 (01) :17-30
[10]  
Christian T., 2022, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V326