Life-cycle assessment and techno-economic analysis of the production of wood vinegar from stem: a case study

被引:4
作者
Zheng, Ji-Lu [1 ]
Zhu, Ya-Hong [1 ]
Dong, Yan-Yan [3 ]
Zhu, Ming-Qiang [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Northwest A&F Univ, Coll Forestry, Yangling 712100, Peoples R China
[2] Northwest A&F Univ, Coll Mech & Elect Engn, Yangling 712100, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Agr Sci, Inst Environm & Sustainable Dev Agr, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
关键词
life-cycle assessment; techno-economic analysis; wood vinegar; activated carbon; Eucommia; FAST PYROLYSIS; EXTRACTION;
D O I
10.1007/s11705-022-2296-2
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
This research undertook a case study of the life-cycle assessment and techno-economic analysis of the slow pyrolysis of Eucommia stem for the production of wood vinegar and activated carbon. The results showed that the production of one ton of wood vinegar via the slow pyrolysis of Eucommia stem show comparatively low global warming potential (2.37 x 10(2) kg CO2 eq), primary energy demand (3.16 x 10(3) MJ), acidification potential (2.19 kg SO2 eq), antimony depletion potential (3.86 x 10(-4) kg antimony eq), and ozone depletion potential (7.46 x 10(-6) kg CFC-11 eq) and was more environmentally friendly than the production of dilute acetic acid (12 wt %) via petrochemical routes. Meanwhile, the total capital investment, total product cost, and cash flowsheet were provided in the techno-economic analysis. Then, the net present value, internal rate of return, and dynamic payback period of the production process were evaluated. The findings indicated that while this production process is cost-effective, it might not be economically attractive or could generate investment risks. An increase in the added value of the wood vinegar and the activated carbon could remarkably improve the economic feasibility of this production process.
引用
收藏
页码:1109 / 1121
页数:13
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   Life Cycle Assessment of activated carbon production from coconut shells [J].
Arena, Noemi ;
Lee, Jacquetta ;
Clift, Roland .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 125 :68-77
[2]   Comparative life cycle assessment of biomass utilization for electricity generation in the European Union and the United States [J].
Beagle, E. ;
Belmont, E. .
ENERGY POLICY, 2019, 128 :267-275
[3]   Framework for consequential life cycle assessment of pyrolysis biorefineries: A case study for the conversion of primary forestry residues [J].
Brassard, P. ;
Godbout, S. ;
Hamelin, L. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2021, 138
[4]   Life cycle economic assessment of coal chemical wastewater treatment facing the 'Zero liquid discharge' industrial water policies in China: Discharge or reuse? [J].
Chen, Bokun ;
Yang, Siyu ;
Cao, Qi ;
Qian, Yu .
ENERGY POLICY, 2020, 137
[5]   Inhibition efficiency of wood vinegar on grey mould of table grapes [J].
Chen, Yu-Hang ;
Li, Yi-Fan ;
Wei, Huan ;
Li, Xiao-Xia ;
Zheng, Huai-Tang ;
Dong, Xin-Yi ;
Xu, Teng-Fei ;
Meng, Jiang-Fei .
FOOD BIOSCIENCE, 2020, 38
[6]   Slow pyrolysis as a platform for negative emissions technology: An integration of machine learning models, life cycle assessment, and economic analysis [J].
Cheng, Fangwei ;
Luo, Hongxi ;
Colosi, Lisa M. .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2020, 223
[7]   Overview of applications of biomass fast pyrolysis oil [J].
Czernik, S ;
Bridgwater, AV .
ENERGY & FUELS, 2004, 18 (02) :590-598
[8]   Anaerobic digestion coupled with three-dimensional iron-carbon electrolysis for enhanced treatment of wood-vinegar wastewater and bacterial structure changes [J].
Fan, Qingwen ;
Li, Yan ;
Zhao, Yuxiao ;
Xu, Haipeng ;
Chen, Lei ;
Hua, Dongliang .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 267
[9]   Prospective life cycle carbon abatement for pyrolysis biochar systems in the UK [J].
Hammond, Jim ;
Shackley, Simon ;
Sohi, Saran ;
Brownsort, Peter .
ENERGY POLICY, 2011, 39 (05) :2646-2655
[10]   Environmental impact associated with activated carbon preparation from olive-waste cake via life cycle assessment [J].
Hjaila, K. ;
Baccar, R. ;
Sarra, M. ;
Gasol, C. M. ;
Blanquez, P. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2013, 130 :242-247