A systematic review of trustworthy and explainable artificial intelligence in healthcare: Assessment of quality, bias risk, and data fusion

被引:260
作者
Albahri, A. S. [1 ]
Duhaim, Ali M. [2 ]
Fadhel, Mohammed A. [3 ]
Alnoor, Alhamzah [4 ]
Baqer, Noor S. [5 ]
Alzubaidi, Laith [6 ,7 ]
Albahri, O. S. [8 ,9 ]
Alamoodi, A. H. [10 ]
Bai, Jinshuai [6 ,7 ]
Salhi, Asma
Santamaria, Jose
Ouyang, Chun
Gupta, Ashish [6 ,7 ]
Gu, Yuantong [6 ,7 ]
Deveci, Muhammet
机构
[1] Iraqi Commiss Comp & Informat ICCI, Baghdad, Iraq
[2] Minist Educ, Nasiriyah, Iraq
[3] Univ Sumer, Coll Comp Sci & Informat Technol, Rifai, Iraq
[4] Southern Tech Univ, Basrah, Iraq
[5] Minist Educ, Baghdad, Iraq
[6] Queensland Univ Technol, Sch Mech Med & Proc Engn, Brisbane, Qld 4000, Australia
[7] Queensland Univ Technol, ARC Ind Transformat Training Ctr Joint Biomech, Brisbane, Qld 4000, Australia
[8] Mazaya Univ Coll, Comp Tech Engn Dept, Nasiriyah, Iraq
[9] La Trobe Univ, Dept Comp Sci & Informat Technol, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[10] Univ Pendidikan Sultan Idris UPSI, Fac Comp & Meta Technol FKMT, Tanjung Malim, Perak, Malaysia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Trustworthiness; Explainability; Artificial intelligence; Healthcare; Information fusion; MONITORING-SYSTEM; BLOCKCHAIN; FRAMEWORK; AI; PREDICTION; DIAGNOSIS; NETWORKS; MEDICINE; MODELS;
D O I
10.1016/j.inffus.2023.03.008
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
In the last few years, the trend in health care of embracing artificial intelligence (AI) has dramatically changed the medical landscape. Medical centres have adopted AI applications to increase the accuracy of disease diag-nosis and mitigate health risks. AI applications have changed rules and policies related to healthcare practice and work ethics. However, building trustworthy and explainable AI (XAI) in healthcare systems is still in its early stages. Specifically, the European Union has stated that AI must be human-centred and trustworthy, whereas in the healthcare sector, low methodological quality and high bias risk have become major concerns. This study endeavours to offer a systematic review of the trustworthiness and explainability of AI applications in healthcare, incorporating the assessment of quality, bias risk, and data fusion to supplement previous studies and provide more accurate and definitive findings. Likewise, 64 recent contributions on the trustworthiness of AI in healthcare from multiple databases (i.e., ScienceDirect, Scopus, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore) were identified using a rigorous literature search method and selection criteria. The considered papers were categorised into a coherent and systematic classification including seven categories: explainable robotics, prediction, decision support, blockchain, transparency, digital health, and review. In this paper, we have presented a systematic and comprehensive analysis of earlier studies and opened the door to potential future studies by discussing in depth the challenges, motivations, and recommendations. In this study a systematic science mapping analysis in order to reorganise and summarise the results of earlier studies to address the issues of trustworthiness and objectivity was also performed. Moreover, this work has provided decisive evidence for the trustworthiness of AI in health care by presenting eight current state-of-the-art critical analyses regarding those more relevant research gaps. In addition, to the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to investigate the feasibility of utilising trustworthy and XAI applications in healthcare, by incorporating data fusion techniques and connecting various important pieces of information from available healthcare datasets and AI algorithms. The analysis of the revised contri-butions revealed crucial implications for academics and practitioners, and then potential methodological aspects to enhance the trustworthiness of AI applications in the medical sector were reviewed. Successively, the theo-retical concept and current use of 17 XAI methods in health care were addressed. Finally, several objectives and guidelines were provided to policymakers to establish electronic health-care systems focused on achieving relevant features such as legitimacy, morality, and robustness. Several types of information fusion in healthcare were focused on in this study, including data, feature, image, decision, multimodal, hybrid, and temporal.
引用
收藏
页码:156 / 191
页数:36
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Artificial intelligence in healthcare institutions: A systematic literature review on influencing factors [J].
Roppelt, Julia Stefanie ;
Kanbach, Dominik K. ;
Kraus, Sascha .
TECHNOLOGY IN SOCIETY, 2024, 76
[22]   Towards trustworthy Artificial Intelligence: Security risk assessment methodology for Artificial Intelligence systems [J].
Iturbe, Eider ;
Rios, Erkuden ;
Toledo, Nerea .
2023 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CLOUD COMPUTING TECHNOLOGY AND SCIENCE, CLOUDCOM 2023, 2023, :291-297
[23]   Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Alzheimer's Disease Classification: A Systematic Review [J].
Viswan, Vimbi ;
Shaffi, Noushath ;
Mahmud, Mufti ;
Subramanian, Karthikeyan ;
Hajamohideen, Faizal .
COGNITIVE COMPUTATION, 2024, 16 (01) :1-44
[24]   Physiological signal analysis using explainable artificial intelligence: A systematic review [J].
Shen, Jian ;
Wu, Jinwen ;
Liang, Huajian ;
Zhao, Zeguang ;
Li, Kunlin ;
Zhu, Kexin ;
Wang, Kang ;
Ma, Yu ;
Hu, Wenbo ;
Guo, Chenxu ;
Zhang, Yanan ;
Hu, Bin .
NEUROCOMPUTING, 2025, 618
[25]   Advancing sweetpotato quality assessment with hyperspectral imaging and explainable artificial intelligence [J].
Ahmed, Toukir ;
Wijewardane, Nuwan K. ;
Lu, Yuzhen ;
Jones, Daniela S. ;
Kudenov, Michael ;
Williams, Cranos ;
Villordon, Arthur ;
Kamruzzaman, Mohammed .
COMPUTERS AND ELECTRONICS IN AGRICULTURE, 2024, 220
[26]   Artificial Intelligence for Student Assessment: A Systematic Review [J].
Gonzalez-Calatayud, Victor ;
Prendes-Espinosa, Paz ;
Roig-Vila, Rosabel .
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2021, 11 (12)
[27]   Explainable artificial intelligence in breast cancer detection and risk prediction: A systematic scoping review [J].
Ghasemi, Amirehsan ;
Hashtarkhani, Soheil ;
Schwartz, David L. ;
Shaban-Nejad, Arash .
CANCER INNOVATION, 2024, 3 (05)
[28]   Data and model bias in artificial intelligence for healthcare applications in New Zealand [J].
Yogarajan, Vithya ;
Dobbie, Gillian ;
Leitch, Sharon ;
Keegan, Te Taka ;
Bensemann, Joshua ;
Witbrock, Michael ;
Asrani, Varsha ;
Reith, David .
FRONTIERS IN COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2022, 4
[29]   The Applications of Artificial Intelligence for Assessing Fall Risk: Systematic Review [J].
Gonzalez-Castro, Ana ;
Leiros-Rodriguez, Raquel ;
Prada-Garcia, Camino ;
Benitez-Andrades, Jose Alberto .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2024, 26
[30]   Systematic Review of the Application of Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Nursing Care [J].
Koo, Thai Hau ;
Zakaria, Andee Dzulkarnaen ;
Ng, Jet Kwan ;
Leong, Xue Bin .
MALAYSIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2024, 31 (05) :135-142