Relational Justice: Egalitarian and Sufficientarian

被引：5

作者：

Bengtson, Andreas ^{[1
]}

Nielsen, Lasse ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] Aarhus Univ, Dept Polit Sci, CEPDISC, Aarhus, Denmark

[2] Univ Southern Denmark, Philosophy, Odense, Denmark

来源：

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHILOSOPHY | 2023年 / 40卷 / 05期

基金：

新加坡国家研究基金会;

关键词：

EQUALITY;

D O I：

10.1111/japp.12658

中图分类号：

B82 [伦理学（道德学）];

学科分类号：

摘要：

Relational egalitarianism is a theory of justice according to which people must relate as equals. In this article, we develop relational sufficientarianism - a view of justice according to which people must relate as sufficients. We distinguish between three versions of this ideal, one that is incompatible with relational egalitarianism and two that are not. Building on this, we argue that relational theorists have good reason to support a pluralist view that is both egalitarian and sufficientarian.

引用

页码：900 / 918

页数：19

共 53 条

[1]

Anderson E, 2010, IMPERATIVE OF INTEGRATION, P1

[2] What is the point of equality? [J].

Anderson, ES .

ETHICS, 1999, 109 (02) :287-337

[3] Sufficiency as Freedom from Duress [J].

Axelsen, David V. ;

Nielsen, Lasse .

JOURNAL OF POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY, 2015, 23 (04) :406-426

[4]

Baker John., 2015, Social Equality, P65, DOI [DOI 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780199331109.003.0004, 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199331109.003.0004]

[5]

Bengtson A., 2022, Social Theory and Practice, V48, P629

[6] Relational egalitarianism and moral unequals [J].

Bengtson, Andreas ;

Lippert-Rasmussen, Kasper .

JOURNAL OF POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY, 2023, 31 (04) :387-410

[7] Making sense of age-group justice: A time for relational equality? [J].

Bidadanure, Juliana .

POLITICS PHILOSOPHY & ECONOMICS, 2016, 15 (03) :234-260

[8] Why sufficiency is not enough [J].

Casal, Paula .

ETHICS, 2007, 117 (02) :296-326

[9]

Cohen GA., 2013, Finding Oneself in the Other

[10] Equality, priority, and compassion [J].

Crisp, R .

ETHICS, 2003, 113 (04) :745-763

← 1 2 3 4 5 6 →