Public health impact and economic value of booster vaccination with Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, bivalent (Original and Omicron BA.4/BA.5) in the United States

被引:9
作者
Di Fusco, Manuela [1 ,6 ]
Marczell, Kinga [2 ]
Thoburn, Elizabeth [3 ]
Wiemken, Timothy. L. L. [3 ]
Yang, Jingyan [1 ,4 ]
Yarnoff, Benjamin [5 ]
机构
[1] Pfizer Inc, New York, NY USA
[2] Evidera, Budapest, Hungary
[3] Pfizer Inc, Collegeville, PA USA
[4] Columbia Univ, Inst Social & Econ Res & Policy, New York, NY USA
[5] Evidera, Bethesda, MD USA
[6] Pfizer Inc, Hlth Econ & Outcomes Res, New York, NY 10017 USA
关键词
Cost-effectiveness; COVID-19; bivalent vaccine booster; Pfizer-BioNTech; public health impact; SARS-CoV-2; United States; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; BNT162B2; OUTCOMES; RECOMMENDATIONS; INFECTION; ADULTS; CARE;
D O I
10.1080/13696998.2023.2193067
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Objective To assess the public health impact and economic value of booster vaccination with the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine, Bivalent in the United States. Methods A combined cohort Markov decision tree model estimated the cost-effectiveness and budget impact of booster vaccination compared to no booster vaccination in individuals aged >= 5 years. Analyses prospectively assessed three scenarios (base case, low, high) defined based upon the emergence (or not) of subvariants, using list prices. Age-stratified parameters were informed by literature. The cost-effectiveness analysis estimated cases, hospitalizations and deaths averted, Life Years (LYs) and Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) gained, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), the net monetary benefit (NMB), and the Return on Investment (ROI). The budget impact analyses used the perspective of a hypothetical 1-million-member plan. Sensitivity analyses explored parameter uncertainty. Conservatively, indirect effects and broad societal benefits were not considered. Results The base case predicted that, compared to no booster vaccination, the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine, Bivalent could result in similar to 3.7 million fewer symptomatic cases, 162 thousand fewer hospitalizations, 45 thousand fewer deaths, 373 thousand fewer discounted QALYs lost, and was cost-saving. Using a conservative value of $50,000 for 1 LY, every $1 invested yielded estimated $4.67 benefits. Unit costs, health outcomes and effectiveness had the greatest impact on results. At $50,000 per QALY gained, the booster generated a 34.2 billion NMB and probabilistic sensitivity analyses indicated a 92% chance of being cost-saving and 98% of being cost-effective. The bivalent was cost-saving or highly cost-effective in high and low scenarios. In a hypothetical 1-million-member health plan population, the vaccine was predicted to be a budget-efficient solution for payers. Conclusions Booster vaccination with the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine, Bivalent for the US population aged >= 5 years could generate notable public health impact and be cost-saving based on the findings of our base case analyses.
引用
收藏
页码:509 / 524
页数:16
相关论文
共 77 条
[1]  
Akinbami LJ, 2022, MMWR-MORBID MORTAL W, V71, P1522, DOI 10.15585/mmwr.mm7148a4
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2022, Ending isolation and precautions for people with COVID-19: Interim guidance
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2022, CDC COVID Data Tracker
[4]  
Arbel R, 2023, Lancet, DOI [10.2139/ssrn.4314067, DOI 10.2139/SSRN.4314067]
[5]   Quality of life and utility decrement associated with Clostridium difficile infection in a French hospital setting [J].
Barbut, Frederic ;
Galperine, Tatiana ;
Vanhems, Philippe ;
Le Monnier, Alban ;
Durand-Gasselin, Bernard ;
Canis, Frederique ;
Jeanbat, Viviane ;
Duburcq, Anne ;
Alami, Sarah ;
Bensoussan, Caroline ;
Fagnani, Francis .
HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2019, 17 (1)
[6]   Estimates of the Global Burden of COVID-19 and the Value of Broad and Equitable Access to COVID-19 Vaccines [J].
Bell, Eleanor ;
Brassel, Simon ;
Oliver, Edward ;
Schirrmacher, Hannah ;
Arnetorp, Sofie ;
Berg, Katja ;
Darroch-Thompson, Duncan ;
Pohja-Hutchison, Paula ;
Mungall, Bruce ;
Carroll, Stuart ;
Postma, Maarten ;
Steuten, Lotte .
VACCINES, 2022, 10 (08)
[7]  
Bendix A., 2022, NBC News
[8]  
Briggs ACK, 2006, Decision modelling for health economic evaluation
[9]  
Bull-Otterson L, 2022, MMWR-MORBID MORTAL W, V71, P713, DOI 10.15585/mmwr.mm7121e1
[10]  
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2022, CDC Interim Clinical Considerations for COVID-19 Treatment in Outpatients