Is it all about the setting? - A comparison of mathematical modelling with real objects and their representation

被引:5
作者
Jablonski, Simone [1 ]
机构
[1] Goethe Univ, Inst Math & Comp Sci Educ, Frankfurt, Germany
关键词
Mathematical modelling; Outdoor mathematics; Mathematizing; Data collection; Qualitative content analysis;
D O I
10.1007/s10649-023-10215-2
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Mathematical modelling emphasizes the connection between mathematics and reality - still, tasks are often exclusively introduced inside the classroom. The paper examines the potential of different task settings for mathematical modelling with real objects: outdoors at the real object itself, with photographs and with a 3D model representation. It is the aim of the study to analyze how far the mathematical modelling steps of students solving the tasks differ in comparison to the settings and representations. In a qualitative study, 19 lower secondary school students worked on tasks of all three settings in a Latin square design. Their working processes in the settings are compared with a special focus on the modelling steps Simplifying and Structuring, as well as Mathematizing. The analysis by means of activity diagrams and a qualitative content analysis shows that both steps are particularly relevant when students work with real objects - independent from the three settings. Still, differences in the actual activities could be observed in the students' discussion on the appropriateness of a model and in dealing with inaccuracies at the real object. In addition, the process of data collection shows different procedures depending on the setting which presents each of them as an enrichment for the acquisition of modelling skills.
引用
收藏
页码:307 / 330
页数:24
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] A Phenomenography Study of STEM Teachers' Conceptions of Using Three-Dimensional Modeling and Printing (3DMP) in Teaching
    Andic, Branko
    Ulbrich, Eva
    Dana-Picard, Thierry
    Cvjeticanin, Stanko
    Petrovic, Filip
    Lavicza, Zsolt
    Maricic, Mirjana
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION AND TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 32 (01) : 45 - 60
  • [2] Arleback J.B., 2019, P 11 C EUR SOC RES M, P1128
  • [3] Teaching math modeling through 3D-printing: Examining the influence of an integrative professional development
    Asempapa, Reuben S.
    Love, Tyler S.
    [J]. SCHOOL SCIENCE AND MATHEMATICS, 2021, 121 (02) : 85 - 95
  • [4] Barbosa, 2020, RES OUTDOOR STEM ED, P47, DOI [10.37626/GA9783959871440.0.06, DOI 10.37626/GA9783959871440.0.06]
  • [5] Barlovits, 2020, RES OUTDOOR STEM ED, P55, DOI [10.37626/GA9783959871440.0.07, DOI 10.37626/GA9783959871440.0.07]
  • [6] Blum W., 2007, MATH MODELING, P222, DOI [10.1533/9780857099419.5.221, DOI 10.1533/9780857099419.5.221]
  • [7] Blum W., 2015, P 12 INT C MATH ED I, P73, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-12688-3_9, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-12688-3]
  • [8] Making versus observing manipulations of geometric properties of triangles to learn geometry using dynamic geometry software
    Bokosmaty, Sahar
    Mavilidi, Myrto-Foteini
    Paas, Fred
    [J]. COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2017, 113 : 313 - 326
  • [9] Buchholtz N., 2021, Quadrante, V30, P140, DOI DOI 10.48489/QUADRANTE.23699
  • [10] Buchholtz N., 2017, Mathematical modelling and applications: Crossing and researching boundaries in mathematics education, P49, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-62968-1_4