The COSI trial: a study protocol for a multi-centre, randomised controlled trial to explore the clinical and cost-effectiveness of the Circle of Security-Parenting Intervention in community perinatal mental health services in England

被引:3
作者
Rosan, Camilla [1 ,2 ]
Dijk, Kim Alyousefi-van [2 ]
Darwin, Zoe [3 ]
Babalis, Daphne [4 ]
Cornelius, Victoria [4 ]
Phillips, Rachel [4 ]
Richards, Lani [2 ]
Wright, Hannah [1 ,2 ]
Pilling, Steve [1 ]
Fearon, Pasco [1 ,5 ]
Pizzo, Elena [6 ]
Fonagy, Peter [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Dept Clin Educ & Hlth Psychol, London, England
[2] Anna Freud Natl Ctr Children & Families, 4-8 Rodney St, London N1, England
[3] Univ Huddersfield, Huddersfield, England
[4] Imperial Coll London, Sch Publ Hlth, Imperial Clin Trials Unit, London, England
[5] Univ Cambridge, Dept Psychol, Cambridge, England
[6] UCL, Dept Appl Hlth Res, London, England
关键词
Perinatal mental health; Circle of Security-Parenting; Parent-infant bonding; Child development; Child attachment; Randomised controlled trial; CORE-OM; OUTCOME MEASURE; DISORDERS; DEPRESSION; ANXIETY; UTILITY; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1186/s13063-023-07194-3
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
BackgroundPerinatal mental health difficulties affect up to 27% of birthing parents during pregnancy and the first postnatal year, and if untreated are associated with difficulties in bonding and long-term adverse outcomes to children. There are large evidence gaps related to psychological treatment, particularly in group therapy approaches and parent-infant interventions. One intervention showing preliminary efficacious findings and user acceptability is Circle of Security-Parenting (COS-P), which is a brief, weekly, group programme. However, these studies were underpowered and predominantly non-randomised, and there has never been a research trial in England or with birthing parents experiencing severe and complex perinatal mental health difficulties. The aim of the research is to conduct a randomised control trial to test whether COS-P will reduce perinatal mental health symptoms in birthing parents accessing NHS perinatal mental health services, compared to treatment as usual (TAU). Secondary objectives include exploring whether the intervention improves parenting sensitivity, emotion regulation skills, attachment security and infant development. Additionally, the project aims to examine whether the intervention is acceptable to parents and NHS staff, and whether it is cost-effective.MethodsCOSI is an individually randomised, single-blind parallel arm controlled trial with an embedded internal pilot aiming to recruit 369 participants in a 2:1 ratio (intervention: TAU). Participants will be recruited from ten NHS community perinatal mental health services in England and screened based on clinical levels of both mental health symptoms (average CORE-OM score >= 1.1) and postnatal bonding difficulties (total PBQ score >= 12). This trial has 90% power to detect a MCID of 5 points on the CORE-OM. Primary and secondary outcomes will be measured at baseline, 3, 7 and 12 months after baseline. Service use and quality of life measures will also be collected alongside a process evaluation of parents' and interveners' views and experiences.DiscussionThis will be the first large pragmatic trial to test whether COS-P is effective for birthing parents with severe and complex perinatal mental health difficulties in improving their mental health symptoms. If shown to be effective, the intervention could be delivered widely across the NHS and other similar services globally.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
Ainsworth M. D. S., 1978, Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the strange situation
[2]   Specificity of cognitive emotion regulation strategies: A transdiagnostic examination [J].
Aldao, Amelia ;
Nolen-Hoeksema, Susan .
BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH AND THERAPY, 2010, 48 (10) :974-983
[3]   The NHS long term plan Rightly ambitious, but can the NHS deliver? [J].
Alderwick, Hugh ;
Dixon, Jennifer .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2019, 364
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2012, GUID MAN
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2006, QUAL RES PSYCHOL, DOI [DOI 10.1191/1478088706QP063OA, 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa, DOI 10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238]
[6]   Suitability and utility of the CORE-OM and CORE-A for assessing severity of presenting problems in psychological therapy services based in primary and secondary care settings [J].
Barkham, M ;
Gilbert, N ;
Connell, J ;
Marshall, C ;
Twigg, E .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2005, 186 :239-246
[7]   Service profiling and outcomes benchmarking using the CORE-OM: Toward practice-based evidence in the psychological therapies [J].
Barkham, M ;
Margison, F ;
Leach, C ;
Lucock, M ;
Mellor-Clark, J ;
Evans, C ;
Benson, L ;
Connell, J ;
Audin, K ;
McGrath, G .
JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 69 (02) :184-196
[8]   The CORE-10: A short measure of psychological distress for routine use in the psychological therapies [J].
Barkham, Michael ;
Bewick, Bridgette ;
Mullin, Tracy ;
Gilbody, Simon ;
Connell, Janice ;
Cahill, Jane ;
Mellor-Clark, John ;
Richards, David ;
Unsworth, Gisela ;
Evans, Chris .
COUNSELLING & PSYCHOTHERAPY RESEARCH, 2013, 13 (01) :3-13
[9]   Lifetime costs of perinatal anxiety and depression [J].
Bauer, Annette ;
Knapp, Martin ;
Parsonage, Michael .
JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2016, 192 :83-90
[10]  
Beecham J., 1992, Measuring mental health needs, V1st, P163