A review of 3D printing low-carbon concrete with one-part geopolymer: Engineering, environmental and economic feasibility

被引:45
|
作者
Al-Noaimat, Yazeed A. [1 ]
Ghaffar, Seyed Hamidreza [1 ,2 ]
Chougan, Mehdi [1 ]
Al-Kheetan, Mazen J. [3 ]
机构
[1] Brunel Univ London, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Uxbridge UB8 3PH, England
[2] Appl Sci Private Univ, Appl Sci Res Ctr, Amman, Jordan
[3] Mutah Univ, Coll Engn, Civil & Environm Engn Dept, POB 7, Mutah 61710, Karak, Jordan
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
3D printing; One -part geopolymers; Solid activator; Fresh properties; Hardened properties; Environmental impact; Cost assessment; ASH-BASED GEOPOLYMER; FLY-ASH; CEMENTITIOUS MATERIALS; MECHANICAL PERFORMANCE; DIGITAL FABRICATION; HARDENED PROPERTIES; MIXTURE DESIGN; CONSTRUCTION; STRENGTH; ALKALI;
D O I
10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01818
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
3D printing is a developing technology that has the ability to use different materials to produce concrete elements with complex shapes. The utilization of geopolymers or alkali-activated ma-terials (AAMs) in 3D printing is receiving significant interest due to the environmental benefits of replacing ordinary Portland cement (OPC). The use of solid activators to produce a one-part geopolymer can help the broader use of geopolymers at large scales, as the corrosive, viscous, and hazardous liquid activators used in two-part geopolymers do not present a feasible large-scale solution for this technology. This paper reviews the 3D printable one-part geopolymers, their compositions, and the effect of different precursor compositions, activator content, and different admixtures on the fresh and hardened properties of the mixtures. The environmental impact and cost assessment of one-part geopolymers produced by conventional and 3D printing methods are also discussed and compared to OPC and two-part geopolymers. This review concluded that one -part geopolymers are easier to mix and use than two-part geopolymers and have a lower carbon footprint than two-part geopolymers and OPC concrete. However, one-part geopolymers may not be as strong as two-part geopolymers, but they are still better than OPC.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Vision of 3D printing with concrete - Technical, economic and environmental potentials
    De Schutter, Geert
    Lesage, Karel
    Mechtcherine, Viktor
    Nerella, Venkatesh Naidu
    Habert, Guillaume
    Agusti-Juan, Isolda
    CEMENT AND CONCRETE RESEARCH, 2018, 112 : 25 - 36
  • [22] Durability of low-carbon geopolymer concrete: A critical review
    Zhang, Bai
    SUSTAINABLE MATERIALS AND TECHNOLOGIES, 2024, 40
  • [23] Cement Composites with Carbon-based Nanomaterials for 3D Concrete Printing Applications - A Review
    Basha, Shaik Inayath
    Rehman, Atta Ur
    Aziz, Md. Abdul
    Kim, Jung-Hoon
    CHEMICAL RECORD, 2023, 23 (04):
  • [24] Life cycle assessment of limestone calcined clay concrete: Potential for low-carbon 3D printing
    Jin, Willy
    Roux, Charlotte
    Ouellet-Plamondon, Claudiane
    Caron, Jean-Francois
    SUSTAINABLE MATERIALS AND TECHNOLOGIES, 2024, 41
  • [25] From analytical methods to numerical simulations: A process engineering toolbox for 3D concrete printing
    Perrot, A.
    Pierre, A.
    Nerella, V. N.
    Wolfs, R. J. M.
    Keita, E.
    Nair, S. A. O.
    Neithalath, N.
    Roussel, N.
    Mechtcherine, V.
    CEMENT & CONCRETE COMPOSITES, 2021, 122
  • [26] Extrusion-based concrete 3D printing from a material perspective: A state-of-the-art review
    Mohan, Manu K.
    Rahul, A. V.
    De Schutter, Geert
    Van Tittelboom, Kim
    CEMENT & CONCRETE COMPOSITES, 2021, 115
  • [27] Recent developments on low carbon 3D printing concrete: Revolutionizing construction through innovative technology
    Khan, Mehran
    McNally, Ciaran
    CLEANER MATERIALS, 2024, 12
  • [28] Snapshot on 3D printing with alternative binders and materials: Earth, geopolymers, gypsum and low carbon concrete
    Perrot, A.
    Jacquet, Y.
    Caron, J. F.
    Mesnil, R.
    Ducoulombier, N.
    De Bono, V.
    Sanjayan, J.
    Ramakrishnan, Saya
    Kloft, H.
    Gosslar, J.
    Muthukrishnan, S.
    Mechtcherine, V.
    Wangler, T.
    Provis, J. L.
    Doerfler, K.
    Krakovska, Ema
    Roussel, N.
    Keita, E.
    CEMENT AND CONCRETE RESEARCH, 2024, 185
  • [29] 3D printed concrete for large-scale buildings: An overview of rheology, printing parameters, chemical admixtures, reinforcements, and economic and environmental prospects
    Souza, Marcelo Tramontin
    Ferreira, Igor Maia
    de Moraes, Elisangela Guzi
    Senff, Luciano
    Novaes de Oliveira, Antonio Pedro
    JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING, 2020, 32
  • [30] 3D printing of geopolymer-based concrete for building applications
    Ur Rehman, Asif
    Sglavo, Vincenzo M.
    RAPID PROTOTYPING JOURNAL, 2020, 26 (10) : 1783 - 1788