A review of 3D printing low-carbon concrete with one-part geopolymer: Engineering, environmental and economic feasibility

被引:63
作者
Al-Noaimat, Yazeed A. [1 ]
Ghaffar, Seyed Hamidreza [1 ,2 ]
Chougan, Mehdi [1 ]
Al-Kheetan, Mazen J. [3 ]
机构
[1] Brunel Univ London, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Uxbridge UB8 3PH, England
[2] Appl Sci Private Univ, Appl Sci Res Ctr, Amman, Jordan
[3] Mutah Univ, Coll Engn, Civil & Environm Engn Dept, POB 7, Mutah 61710, Karak, Jordan
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
3D printing; One -part geopolymers; Solid activator; Fresh properties; Hardened properties; Environmental impact; Cost assessment; ASH-BASED GEOPOLYMER; FLY-ASH; CEMENTITIOUS MATERIALS; MECHANICAL PERFORMANCE; DIGITAL FABRICATION; HARDENED PROPERTIES; MIXTURE DESIGN; CONSTRUCTION; STRENGTH; ALKALI;
D O I
10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01818
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
3D printing is a developing technology that has the ability to use different materials to produce concrete elements with complex shapes. The utilization of geopolymers or alkali-activated ma-terials (AAMs) in 3D printing is receiving significant interest due to the environmental benefits of replacing ordinary Portland cement (OPC). The use of solid activators to produce a one-part geopolymer can help the broader use of geopolymers at large scales, as the corrosive, viscous, and hazardous liquid activators used in two-part geopolymers do not present a feasible large-scale solution for this technology. This paper reviews the 3D printable one-part geopolymers, their compositions, and the effect of different precursor compositions, activator content, and different admixtures on the fresh and hardened properties of the mixtures. The environmental impact and cost assessment of one-part geopolymers produced by conventional and 3D printing methods are also discussed and compared to OPC and two-part geopolymers. This review concluded that one -part geopolymers are easier to mix and use than two-part geopolymers and have a lower carbon footprint than two-part geopolymers and OPC concrete. However, one-part geopolymers may not be as strong as two-part geopolymers, but they are still better than OPC.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 127 条
[71]   Costs and carbon emissions for geopolymer pastes in comparison to ordinary portland cement [J].
McLellan, Benjamin C. ;
Williams, Ross P. ;
Lay, Janine ;
van Riessen, Arie ;
Corder, Glen D. .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2011, 19 (9-10) :1080-1090
[72]   Extrusion-based additive manufacturing with cement-based materials - Production steps, processes, and their underlying physics: A review [J].
Mechtcherine, V ;
Bos, F. P. ;
Perrot, A. ;
da Silva, W. R. Leal ;
Nerella, V. N. ;
Fataei, S. ;
Wolfs, R. J. M. ;
Sonebi, M. ;
Roussel, N. .
CEMENT AND CONCRETE RESEARCH, 2020, 132
[73]   Large-scale digital concrete construction-CONPrint3D concept for on-site, monolithic 3D-printing [J].
Mechtcherine, Viktor ;
Nerella, Venkatesh Naidu ;
Will, Frank ;
Naether, Mathias ;
Otto, Jens ;
Krause, Martin .
AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION, 2019, 107
[74]   Testing pumpability of concrete using Sliding Pipe Rheometer [J].
Mechtcherine, Viktor ;
Nerella, Venkatesh Naidu ;
Kasten, Knut .
CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, 2014, 53 :312-323
[75]  
Mindess S., 2019, SUSTAINABILITY CONCR, DOI [10.1016/B978-0-08-102616-8.00001-0, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-08-102616-8.00001-0]
[76]   3D Concrete Printing Sustainability: A Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Four Construction Method Scenarios [J].
Mohammad, Malek ;
Masad, Eyad ;
Al-Ghamdi, Sami G. .
BUILDINGS, 2020, 10 (12) :1-20
[77]   Extrusion-based concrete 3D printing from a material perspective: A state-of-the-art review [J].
Mohan, Manu K. ;
Rahul, A. V. ;
De Schutter, Geert ;
Van Tittelboom, Kim .
CEMENT & CONCRETE COMPOSITES, 2021, 115
[78]   Rheological and pumping behaviour of 3D printable cementitious materials with varying aggregate content [J].
Mohan, Manu K. ;
Rahul, A., V ;
Van Tittelboom, Kim ;
De Schutter, Geert .
CEMENT AND CONCRETE RESEARCH, 2021, 139
[79]   Effect of alkali reactions on the rheology of one-part 3D printable geopolymer concrete [J].
Muthukrishnan, Shravan ;
Ramakrishnan, Sayanthan ;
Sanjayan, Jay .
CEMENT & CONCRETE COMPOSITES, 2021, 116 (116)
[80]   Geopolymers in construction - recent developments [J].
Nawaz, Mohsin ;
Heitor, Ana ;
Sivakumar, Muttucumaru .
CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, 2020, 260