Predictors for response to electronic patient-reported outcomes in routine care in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a retrospective cohort study

被引:3
|
作者
Wiegel, Jimmy [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Seppen, Bart F. [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Nurmohamed, Michael T. [1 ,2 ,4 ,6 ]
ter Wee, Marieke M. [3 ,5 ]
Bos, Wouter H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Reade, Amsterdam Rheumatol & Immunol Ctr, Admiraal Helfrichstr 1, NL-1056 Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Amsterdam UMC Locat VUmc, Amsterdam Rheumatol & Immunol Ctr, Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Vrije Univ, Dept Epidemiol & Data Sci, Amsterdam UMC Locat, Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Amsterdam UMC Locat Vrije Univ, Dept Rheumatol & Immunol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Amsterdam Publ Hlth, Methodol, Societal Participat Hlth, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[6] Amsterdam Inst Infect & Immun, Inflammatory Dis, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Electronic patient reported outcomes; ePROs; Adherence; Rheumatoid arthritis; eHealth; Telehealth; DISEASE;
D O I
10.1007/s00296-023-05278-6
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Routine collection of electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) can improve clinical care. However, a low response rate may counteract the benefits. To optimize adoption, the aim of this study was to investigate which patient factors and/or timing of the invitation predicted response to ePROs sent prior to consultations in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. We performed a retrospective database study with clinical data collected as part of usual care from the electronic medical records at Reade Amsterdam. The dataset comprised the email invitations to complete the ePRO sent prior to consultation. Multiple patient factors and factors defining the timing of the invitation were investigated if they predicted response to the ePRO through a multivariable logistic generalized estimating equation analysis. In total, 17.070 ePRO invitations were sent to 3194 patients (mean age 60 (SD 14), 74% female), of which 40% was completed. Patients between 55 and 73 years (OR 1.39, 95%CI 1.09-1.77) and with higher social economic status (SES) (OR 1.51, 95%CI 1.22-1.88) had significantly higher odds for completing the ePRO, while patients living in an urban area had lower odds (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.62-0.76). In year 4 after implementation, the OR was increased to 3.69 (95% CI 2.91-4.90). The implementation of ePROs in daily clinical practice needs improvement since 40% of the ePROs sent prior to consultations were completed. Patients that had higher odds to report the next ePRO were between the age of 55-73, had a higher socio-economic status, and were residents in a rural area. The adoption of reporting the PRO increased over time, but the timing of the prompt did not predict response. Additional research is needed to understand ePRO completion, especially for patients with lower socio-economic status.
引用
收藏
页码:651 / 657
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Patient adherence with a smartphone app for patient-reported outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis
    Colls, Josh
    Lee, Yvonne C.
    Xu, Chang
    Corrigan, Cassandra
    Lu, Fengxin
    Marquez-Grap, Georgia
    Murray, Meredith
    Suh, Dong H.
    Solomon, Daniel H.
    RHEUMATOLOGY, 2021, 60 (01) : 108 - 112
  • [22] Pruritus as an unmet palliative care need in cancer patients: A retrospective cohort study of a Duke patient-reported outcomes database
    Hudson, Kathryn Elizabeth
    Wolf, Steven Paul
    Pupa, Mary Ruth
    King, Danielle Grace
    Locke, Susan C.
    Abernethy, Amy P.
    LeBlanc, Thomas William
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 33 (29)
  • [23] Effect of Patient-reported Outcomes on Changes in DMARD Therapy Among Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Treated in Routine Clinical Practice
    Stevens, Lauren
    Mulder, Kyra
    Su, Zhaohui
    Kumparatana, Pam
    Paulus, Jessica
    Weiss, Stefan
    ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATOLOGY, 2022, 74 : 1436 - 1437
  • [24] Perspectives of Patients on the Utility of Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes on Cancer Care
    Seow, Hsien
    King, Susan
    Green, Esther
    Pereira, Jose
    Sawka, Carol
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 29 (31) : 4213 - 4214
  • [25] Use of Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes in the Care of Patients with Kidney Failure
    Schick-Makaroff, Kara
    Mharapara, Primrose
    NEPHROLOGY NURSING JOURNAL, 2020, 47 (05) : 465 - 472
  • [26] Patient-reported outcomes of upadacitinib versus abatacept in rheumatoid arthritis
    Thorley, Jennifer
    LANCET RHEUMATOLOGY, 2022, 4 (08): : E531 - E531
  • [27] Relationship of patient-reported outcomes with MRI measures in rheumatoid arthritis
    Baker, Joshua F.
    Conaghan, Philip G.
    Emery, Paul
    Baker, Daniel G.
    Ostergaard, Mikkel
    ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2017, 76 (03) : 486 - 490
  • [28] Patient-reported outcomes and their-role in the assessment of rheumatoid arthritis
    Lubeck, DP
    PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2004, 22 (02) : 27 - 38
  • [29] Perspectives of Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients on Electronic Communication and Patient-Reported Outcome Data Collection: A Qualitative Study
    Navarro-Millan, Iris
    Zinski, Anne
    Shurbaji, Sally
    Johnson, Bernadette
    Fraenkel, Liana
    Willig, James
    Danila, Maria I.
    Yun, Huifeng
    Curtis, Jeffrey R.
    Safford, Monika M.
    ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH, 2019, 71 (01) : 80 - 87
  • [30] The impact of functional medicine on patient-reported outcomes in inflammatory arthritis: A retrospective study
    Droz, Nicole
    Hanaway, Patrick
    Hyman, Mark
    Jin, Yuxuan
    Beidelschies, Michelle
    Husni, M. Elaine
    PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (10):