Effect of neuromuscular reversal with neostigmine/glycopyrrolate versus sugammadex on postoperative ileus following colorectal surgery

被引:6
|
作者
Traeger, L. [1 ,2 ]
Hall, T. D. [3 ]
Bedrikovetski, S. [1 ,2 ]
Kroon, H. M. [1 ,2 ]
Dudi-Venkata, N. N. [1 ]
Moore, J. W. [1 ,2 ]
Sammour, T. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Royal Adelaide Hosp, Dept Surg, Colorectal Unit, Port Rd, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
[2] Univ Adelaide, Fac Hlth & Med Sci, Adelaide Med Sch, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[3] Flinders Med Ctr, Dept Anaesthesia, Bedford Pk, SA, Australia
关键词
Neostigmine; Glycopyrrolate; Sugammadex; GI-2; Ileus; Colorectal surgery; Acetylcholinesterase inhibitor; RECOVERY;
D O I
10.1007/s10151-022-02695-w
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Postoperative ileus (POI) is a common complication following colorectal surgery and is mediated in part by the cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway (CAIP). Neostigmine (acetylcholinesterase inhibitor), co-administered with glycopyrrolate, is frequently given for neuromuscular reversal before tracheal extubation and modulates the CAIP. An alternative reversal agent, sugammadex (selective rocuronium or vecuronium binder), acts independently from the CAIP. The aim of our study was to assess the impact of neuromuscular reversal agents used during anaesthesia on gastrointestinal recovery. Methods Three hundred thirty-five patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery at the Royal Adelaide Hospital between January 2019 and December 2021 were retrospectively included. The primary outcome was GI-2, a validated composite measure of time to diet tolerance and passage of stool. Demographics, 30-day complications and length of stay were collected. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. Results Two hundred twenty-four (66.9%) patients (129 [57.6%] males and 95 [42.4%] females, median age 64 [19-90] years) received neostigmine/glycopyrrolate and 111 (33.1%) received sugammadex (62 [55.9%] males and 49 [44.1%] females, median age 67 [18-94] years). Sugammadex patients achieved GI-2 sooner after surgery (median 3 (0-10) vs. 3 (0-12) days, p = 0.036), and reduced time to first stool (median 2 (0-10) vs. 3 (0-12) days, p = 0.035). Rates of POI, complications and length of stay were similar. On univariate analysis, POI was associated with smoking history, previous abdominal surgery, colostomy formation, increased opioid use and postoperative hypokalaemia (p < 0.05). POI was associated with increased complications, including anastomotic leak and prolonged hospital stay (p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, neostigmine, bowel anastomoses and increased postoperative opioid use (p < 0.05) remained predictive of time to GI-2. Conclusions Patients who received sugammadex had a reduced time to achieving first stool and GI-2. Neostigmine use, bowel anastomoses and postoperative opioid use were associated with delayed time to achieving GI-2.
引用
收藏
页码:217 / 226
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of postoperative oxygenation in children receiving sugammadex versus neostigmine for reversal of neuromuscular blockade: a retrospective cohort study
    Paredes, Stephania
    Ott, Sascha
    Rossler, Julian
    Cekmecelioglu, Busra T.
    Trombetta, Carlos
    Li, Yufei
    Turan, Alparslan
    Ruetzler, Kurt
    Chhabada, Surendrasingh
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 2025,
  • [22] Effect of sugammadex versus neostigmine/atropine combination on postoperative cognitive dysfunction after elective surgery
    Batistaki, C.
    Riga, M.
    Zafeiropoulou, F.
    Lyrakos, G.
    Kostopanagiotou, G.
    Matsota, P.
    ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE, 2017, 45 (05) : 581 - 588
  • [23] Effect of sugammadex with neostigmine on postoperative bowel function and on recovery of neuromuscular functions: A randomized controlled trial
    Postaci, Aysun
    Durgut, Ridvan
    Aytac, Betul Guven
    Ceyhan, Meryem
    MEDICINE, 2024, 103 (37) : e39623
  • [24] Randomised controlled trial of sugammadex or neostigmine for reversal of neuromuscular block on the incidence of pulmonary complications in older adults undergoing prolonged surgery
    Togioka, Brandon M.
    Yanez, David
    Aziz, Michael F.
    Higgins, Janna R.
    Tekkali, Praveen
    Treggiari, Miriam M.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2020, 124 (05) : 553 - 561
  • [25] Sugammadex versus neostigmine reversal of moderate rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade in Korean patients
    Woo, Tiffany
    Kim, Kyo Sang
    Shim, Yon Hee
    Kim, Mi Kyeong
    Yoon, Suk Min
    Lim, Young Jin
    Yang, Hong Seuk
    Phiri, Phillip
    Chon, Jin Young
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2013, 65 (06) : 501 - 507
  • [26] Influence of sugammadex versus neostigmine for neuromuscular block reversal on the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Jia-Feng Wang
    Zhen-Zhen Zhao
    Zheng-Yu Jiang
    Hui-Xing Liu
    Xiao-Ming Deng
    Perioperative Medicine, 10
  • [27] SPLIT-DOSE ATROPINE VERSUS GLYCOPYRROLATE WITH NEOSTIGMINE FOR REVERSAL OF GALLAMINE-INDUCED NEUROMUSCULAR BLOCKADE
    WETTERSLEV, J
    JARNVIG, I
    JORGENSEN, LN
    OLSEN, NV
    ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1991, 35 (05) : 398 - 401
  • [28] Reversal of neuromuscular block by sugammadex is associated with less postoperative respiratory dysfunction in the PACU compared with neostigmine: a retrospective study
    Lee, Andrew
    Grogan, Tristan
    Gabel, Eilon
    Hofer, Ira S.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2024, 132 (01) : 175 - 177
  • [29] Half-dose sugammadex with neostigmine versus full-dose sugammadex for reversal of rocuronium in laparoscopic bariatric surgery
    Mohamed A. Ghanem
    Mohamed Nasr
    Abd el Aziz Motawee
    Samah El-kenany
    Ain-Shams Journal of Anesthesiology, 12
  • [30] A systematic review of sugammadex vs neostigmine for reversal of neuromuscular blockade
    Abad-Gurumeta, A.
    Ripolles-Melchor, J.
    Casans-Frances, R.
    Espinosa, A.
    Martinez-Hurtado, E.
    Fernandez-Perez, C.
    Ramirez, J. M.
    Lopez-Timoneda, F.
    Calvo-Vecino, J. M.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2015, 70 (12) : 1441 - 1452