Board characteristics and demand for audit quality: a meta-analysis

被引:11
作者
Kalia, Deepali [1 ]
Basu, Debarati [2 ]
Kundu, Sayantan [3 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Management Ranchi, Dept Accounting & Finance, Ranchi, Bihar, India
[2] Shiv Nadar Univ, Dept Finance Accounting & Control, Greater Noida, India
[3] Praxis Business Sch, Kolkata, India
关键词
Heterogeneity; Audit fees; Emerging markets; Internal and external governance; CORPORATE GOVERNANCE; EARNINGS MANAGEMENT; COMMITTEE EFFECTIVENESS; FIRM PERFORMANCE; FEES EVIDENCE; INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS; MULTIPLE DIRECTORSHIPS; VOLUNTARY DISCLOSURE; GENDER DIVERSITY; INTERNAL CONTROL;
D O I
10.1108/ARA-05-2022-0121
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Purpose The study explores extant knowledge on the nature of the relationship between internal and external corporate governance mechanisms, particularly board characteristics and audit quality, respectively, while also investigating how the relationship varies across geographies. Design/methodology/approach The extant knowledge is synthesized using a meta-analysis, which is conducted using a sample of 56 empirical studies from publications of varying grades. The studies span over 25 years (1996-2021) and cover 147 empirical samples (343,787 firm-year observations) across more than 20 countries. The dependent variable is audit fees, and the independent variable captures 12 different measures of board characteristics. Findings Overall, the results reveal a positive association between board characteristics and audit fees, indicating complementarity between governance mechanisms. Effect size analysis shows board characteristics, like size and independence, are positively associated with audit fees. However, heterogeneity is noted for some characteristics, and further analysis by geography (developed vs emerging countries) explains the heterogeneity. Practical implications This study helps multiple stakeholders like firms, shareholders, boards, regulators and policymakers in designing and strengthening governance frameworks. Social implications Both governance and auditing literature benefit from identifying specific board characteristics that drive audit quality consistently across different institutional settings and samples. Heterogeneity analysis helps improve the understanding of contradictions documented in prior literature. Originality/value This meta-analysis is the first to explore the interplay between internal and external corporate governance mechanisms, with a focus on board characteristics and audit quality. The study provides valuable insights on how different governance mechanisms influence each other while highlighting, for the first time, how the interaction between governance mechanisms varies by a country's level of development.
引用
收藏
页码:153 / 175
页数:23
相关论文
共 139 条
  • [1] Audit committee characteristics and restatements
    Abbott, LJ
    Parker, S
    Peters, GF
    [J]. AUDITING-A JOURNAL OF PRACTICE & THEORY, 2004, 23 (01): : 69 - 87
  • [2] The association between audit committee characteristics and audit fees
    Abbott, LJ
    Parker, S
    Peters, GF
    Raghunandan, K
    [J]. AUDITING-A JOURNAL OF PRACTICE & THEORY, 2003, 22 (02): : 17 - 32
  • [3] Auditor selection and audit committee characteristics
    Abbott, LJ
    Parker, S
    [J]. AUDITING-A JOURNAL OF PRACTICE & THEORY, 2000, 19 (02): : 47 - 66
  • [4] Multiple large ownership structure, audit committee activity and audit fees Evidence from the UK
    Adelopo, Ismail
    Jallow, Kumba
    Scott, Peter
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2012, 13 (02) : 100 - +
  • [5] Multiple directorships and acquirer returns
    Ahn, Seoungpil
    Jiraporn, Pornsit
    Kim, Young Sang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2010, 34 (09) : 2011 - 2026
  • [6] The associations between audit firm attributes and audit quality-specific indicators A meta-analysis
    Alareeni, Bahaaeddin Ahmed
    [J]. MANAGERIAL AUDITING JOURNAL, 2019, 34 (01) : 6 - 43
  • [7] Female audit committee members and their influence on audit fees
    Aldamen, Husam
    Hollindale, Janice
    Ziegelmayer, Jennifer L.
    [J]. ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE, 2018, 58 (01) : 57 - 89
  • [8] The impact of audit committee effectiveness on audit fees and non-audit service fees: Evidence from Australia
    Ali, Muhammad Jahangir
    Singh, Rajbans Kaur Shingara
    Al-Akra, Mahmoud
    [J]. ACCOUNTING RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2018, 31 (02) : 174 - 191
  • [9] The effectiveness of internal corporate governance and audit quality: the role of ownership concentration - Malaysian evidence
    AlQadasi, Adel
    Abidin, Shamharir
    [J]. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUSINESS IN SOCIETY, 2018, 18 (02): : 233 - 253
  • [10] Board characteristics, accounting report integrity, and the cost of debt
    Anderson, RC
    Mansi, SA
    Reeb, DM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 2004, 37 (03) : 315 - 342