Teaching computer programming: impact of Brown and Wilson's didactical principles

被引:1
作者
Belmar, Hector [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] INACAP Natl Profess Training Inst, Sch Comp Engn, Nunoa Campus, Santiago, Chile
[2] UMCE Metropolitan Univ Educ Sci, Santiago, Chile
来源
FRONTIERS IN COMPUTER SCIENCE | 2023年 / 5卷
关键词
computer programming; algorithm; didactics; evaluation instrument; didactical principles; COMPUTATIONAL THINKING;
D O I
10.3389/fcomp.2023.1085507
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
This research studies the effects of the application of didactics to the teaching of computer programming, focusing on programming skills in the Python computer language. The problem arises from the failure and dropout rates of students in computer programming in computer science careers in INACAP and the consequent interest in promoting better learning. The general objective is to study the effects of an innovative methodology, based on Brown and Wilson's didactic principles, on the teaching process of Python programming in computer science students at INACAP. The theoretical framework is based on the didactics of teaching computer programming and the concepts of computational thinking skills of various theoretical references, and in particular on the didactic principles of Brown and Wilson. This research is carried out with a quantitative methodology of explanatory scope and with a quasi-experimental design, with a purposive sample, for the experimental stage the sample will consist of 100 first year undergraduate students of Computer Science, of which 50 will be the experimental group and 50 will be the control group. The hypothesis proposed is that "The students in the experimental group obtain a higher performance when applying Brown and Wilson's didactic principles than the students in the control group who are taught in a traditional way." The data collection technique used will be a 45-question multiple-choice test. The data analysis will be performed by applying statistical criteria, comparison of means and variances, among others.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   How Many Abilities Can We Measure in Computational Thinking? A Study on Bebras Challenge [J].
Araujo, Ana Liz Souto O. ;
Andrade, Wilkerson L. ;
Serey Guerrero, Dalton D. ;
Araujo Melo, Monilly Ramos .
SIGCSE '19: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 50TH ACM TECHNICAL SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2019, :545-551
[2]  
Auer M. E., 2019, P 21 INT C INT COLL, P215, DOI [10.1007/978-3-030-11935-5, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-11935-5]
[3]  
Garrido HMB, 2023, Journal of Education and Development, V7, P52, DOI [10.20849/jed.v7i1.1320, 10.20849/jed.v7i1.1320, DOI 10.20849/JED.V7I1.1320]
[4]   Review on the teaching of programming and computational thinking in the world [J].
Belmar, Hector .
FRONTIERS IN COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2022, 4
[5]  
Bennedsen J., 2007, SIGCSE Bulletin, V39, P32, DOI 10.1145/1272848.1272879
[6]  
Bergner N., 2018, HOCHSCHULDIDAKTIK IN
[7]  
Bocconi S., 2016, Developing computational thinking in compulsory education, DOI 10.2791/792158
[8]   Ten quick tips for teaching programming [J].
Brown, Neil C. C. ;
Wilson, Greg .
PLOS COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY, 2018, 14 (04)
[9]  
Camacho C., 2019, ANALISIS VARIANZA ME
[10]  
Carrillo F., 2018, FORMACION COMPETENCI