Postoperative Risk of Transfusion After Reversal of Residual Neuromuscular Block With Sugammadex Versus Neostigmine: A Retrospective Cohort Study

被引:2
|
作者
Schmidt, Marc T. [1 ]
Paredes, Stephania [2 ]
Rossler, Julian [1 ]
Mukhia, Rupashi [1 ]
Pu, Xuan [3 ]
Mao, Guangmei [3 ]
Turan, Alparslan [1 ,4 ]
Ruetzler, Kurt [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin, Anesthesiol Inst, Dept Outcomes Res, 9500 Euclid Ave,P-77, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[2] Cleveland Clin, Anesthesiol Inst, Cleveland, OH USA
[3] Cleveland Clin, Lerner Res Inst, Dept Quantitat Hlth Sci, Cleveland, OH USA
[4] Cleveland Clin, Anesthesiol Inst, Dept Gen Anesthesiol, Cleveland, OH USA
关键词
PARTIAL THROMBOPLASTIN TIME; ROCURONIUM; COMPLICATIONS; AGENT; CARE;
D O I
10.1213/ANE.0000000000006275
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND:Sugammadex and neostigmine are routinely used to reverse residual neuromuscular blocks at the end of surgery. Sugammadex has been linked with prolongation of laboratory coagulation markers, but clinical relevance on postoperative blood loss and transfusions remains unclear. METHODS:In this retrospective, single-center, cohort study, we analyzed medical records of adult patients having noncardiac surgery who were given sugammadex or neostigmine from May 2016 to December 2020. Our primary outcome was the incidence of any postoperative transfusion of red blood cells, and/or fresh-frozen plasma, and/or platelets. Secondary outcomes were duration of hospitalization, need for resurgery, and postoperative intensive care unit (ICU) admission. After propensity score weighting, the odds ratio (OR) for postoperative transfusion was assessed in both groups (sugammadex versus neostigmine) using a generalized estimation equation to count within-subject correlation weighted by the inverse propensity score. RESULTS:Out of 39,325 eligible surgeries, 33,903 surgeries in 29,062 patients were included in the analysis; with 4581 patients receiving sugammadex and 29,322 patients receiving neostigmine. The raw incidence of postoperative transfusion was 7.40% in sugammadex and 7.45% in the neostigmine group. After weighting by propensity score, the incidence of postoperative transfusion was 8.01% in the sugammadex and 7.38% in the neostigmine group (OR, 1.11 [95% confidence interval [CI], 0.97-1.26; P = .118]). There was no difference in duration of hospitalization and need for resurgery, but odds of postoperative ICU admission were significantly higher for patients receiving sugammadex than those receiving neostigmine (OR, 1.33 [98.33% CI, 1.17-1.52; P < .0001]). Our a priori planned analysis of coagulation laboratory parameters could not be completed because of a high amount of missing laboratory data. CONCLUSIONS:There is no statistically significant nor clinically important difference in the risk of postoperative transfusion in patients receiving sugammadex or neostigmine.
引用
收藏
页码:745 / 752
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Muscle weakness after sugammadex: incomplete reversal of neuromuscular blockade or delayed postoperative recurarisation?
    Dubois, Bente F. H.
    Fraessdorf, Jan
    Blobner, Manfred
    Hollmann, Markus W.
    Mouws, Elisabeth M. J. P.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2023, 130 (03) : E409 - E412
  • [32] A case series of re-establishment of neuromuscular block with rocuronium after sugammadex reversal
    Iwasaki, Hajime
    Sasakawa, Tomoki
    Takahoko, Kenichi
    Takagi, Shunichi
    Nakatsuka, Hideki
    Suzuki, Takahiro
    Iwasaki, Hiroshi
    JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA, 2016, 30 (03) : 534 - 537
  • [33] Prolonged neuromuscular block associated to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis in morbidly obese patient: neostigmine versus sugammadex
    Carron, M.
    Parotto, E.
    Ori, C.
    MINERVA ANESTESIOLOGICA, 2012, 78 (01) : 112 - 113
  • [34] A case series of re-establishment of neuromuscular block with rocuronium after sugammadex reversal
    Hajime Iwasaki
    Tomoki Sasakawa
    Kenichi Takahoko
    Shunichi Takagi
    Hideki Nakatsuka
    Takahiro Suzuki
    Hiroshi Iwasaki
    Journal of Anesthesia, 2016, 30 : 534 - 537
  • [35] Effects of sugammadex on incidence of postoperative residual neuromuscular blockade: a randomized, controlled study
    Brueckmann, B.
    Sasaki, N.
    Grobara, P.
    Li, M. K.
    Woo, T.
    de Bie, J.
    Maktabi, M.
    Lee, J.
    Kwo, J.
    Pino, R.
    Sabouri, A. S.
    McGovern, F.
    Staehr-Rye, A. K.
    Eikermann, M.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2015, 115 (05) : 743 - 751
  • [36] Rocuronium Reversal in the Emergency Department: Retrospective Evaluation of Hemodynamic Instability Following Administration of Sugammadex Versus Neostigmine With Glycopyrrolate
    Hile, Garrett B.
    Healy, Karl J.
    Almassalkhi, Lars R.
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACY PRACTICE, 2023, 36 (02) : 336 - 341
  • [37] Randomised controlled trial of sugammadex or neostigmine for reversal of neuromuscular block on the incidence of pulmonary complications in older adults undergoing prolonged surgery
    Togioka, Brandon M.
    Yanez, David
    Aziz, Michael F.
    Higgins, Janna R.
    Tekkali, Praveen
    Treggiari, Miriam M.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2020, 124 (05) : 553 - 561
  • [38] Predictive study of pharmacological reversal for residual neuromuscular blockade and postoperative pulmonary complications: a prospective, observational, cohort study
    Aragon-Benedi, Cristian
    Pascual-Bellosta, Ana
    Ortega-Lucea, Sonia
    Visiedo-Sanchez, Sara
    Martinez-Ubieto, Javier
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2022, 12 (01)
  • [39] Operating room discharge after deep neuromuscular block reversed with sugammadex compared with shallow block reversed with neostigmine: a randomized controlled trial
    Putz, Laurie
    Dransart, Christophe
    Jamart, Jacques
    Marotta, Maria-Laura
    Delnooz, Geraldine
    Dubois, Philippe E.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2016, 35 : 107 - 113
  • [40] Effects of Neostigmine Reversal of Nondepolarizing Neuromuscular Blocking Agents on Postoperative Respiratory Outcomes A Prospective Study
    Sasaki, Nobuo
    Meyer, Matthew J.
    Malviya, Sanjana A.
    Stanislaus, Anne B.
    MacDonald, Teresa
    Doran, Mary E.
    Igumenshcheva, Arina
    Hoang, Alan H.
    Eikermann, Matthias
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2014, 121 (05) : 959 - 968