Postoperative Risk of Transfusion After Reversal of Residual Neuromuscular Block With Sugammadex Versus Neostigmine: A Retrospective Cohort Study

被引:2
|
作者
Schmidt, Marc T. [1 ]
Paredes, Stephania [2 ]
Rossler, Julian [1 ]
Mukhia, Rupashi [1 ]
Pu, Xuan [3 ]
Mao, Guangmei [3 ]
Turan, Alparslan [1 ,4 ]
Ruetzler, Kurt [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin, Anesthesiol Inst, Dept Outcomes Res, 9500 Euclid Ave,P-77, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[2] Cleveland Clin, Anesthesiol Inst, Cleveland, OH USA
[3] Cleveland Clin, Lerner Res Inst, Dept Quantitat Hlth Sci, Cleveland, OH USA
[4] Cleveland Clin, Anesthesiol Inst, Dept Gen Anesthesiol, Cleveland, OH USA
关键词
PARTIAL THROMBOPLASTIN TIME; ROCURONIUM; COMPLICATIONS; AGENT; CARE;
D O I
10.1213/ANE.0000000000006275
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND:Sugammadex and neostigmine are routinely used to reverse residual neuromuscular blocks at the end of surgery. Sugammadex has been linked with prolongation of laboratory coagulation markers, but clinical relevance on postoperative blood loss and transfusions remains unclear. METHODS:In this retrospective, single-center, cohort study, we analyzed medical records of adult patients having noncardiac surgery who were given sugammadex or neostigmine from May 2016 to December 2020. Our primary outcome was the incidence of any postoperative transfusion of red blood cells, and/or fresh-frozen plasma, and/or platelets. Secondary outcomes were duration of hospitalization, need for resurgery, and postoperative intensive care unit (ICU) admission. After propensity score weighting, the odds ratio (OR) for postoperative transfusion was assessed in both groups (sugammadex versus neostigmine) using a generalized estimation equation to count within-subject correlation weighted by the inverse propensity score. RESULTS:Out of 39,325 eligible surgeries, 33,903 surgeries in 29,062 patients were included in the analysis; with 4581 patients receiving sugammadex and 29,322 patients receiving neostigmine. The raw incidence of postoperative transfusion was 7.40% in sugammadex and 7.45% in the neostigmine group. After weighting by propensity score, the incidence of postoperative transfusion was 8.01% in the sugammadex and 7.38% in the neostigmine group (OR, 1.11 [95% confidence interval [CI], 0.97-1.26; P = .118]). There was no difference in duration of hospitalization and need for resurgery, but odds of postoperative ICU admission were significantly higher for patients receiving sugammadex than those receiving neostigmine (OR, 1.33 [98.33% CI, 1.17-1.52; P < .0001]). Our a priori planned analysis of coagulation laboratory parameters could not be completed because of a high amount of missing laboratory data. CONCLUSIONS:There is no statistically significant nor clinically important difference in the risk of postoperative transfusion in patients receiving sugammadex or neostigmine.
引用
收藏
页码:745 / 752
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Required dose of sugammadex or neostigmine for reversal of vecuronium-induced shallow residual neuromuscular block at a train-of-four ratio of 0.3
    He, Jing
    He, Huan
    Li, Xing
    Sun, Mei
    Lai, Zhihao
    Xu, Bo
    CTS-CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE, 2022, 15 (01): : 234 - 243
  • [22] Retrospective analysis of 30-day unplanned readmission after major abdominal surgery with reversal by sugammadex or neostigmine
    Oh, Tak Kyu
    Oh, Ah-Young
    Ryu, Jung-Hee
    Koo, Bon-Wook
    Song, In-Ae
    Nam, Sun Woo
    Jee, Hee-Jung
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2019, 122 (03) : 370 - 378
  • [23] Sugammadex versus neostigmine reversal of moderate rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade in Korean patients
    Woo, Tiffany
    Kim, Kyo Sang
    Shim, Yon Hee
    Kim, Mi Kyeong
    Yoon, Suk Min
    Lim, Young Jin
    Yang, Hong Seuk
    Phiri, Phillip
    Chon, Jin Young
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2013, 65 (06) : 501 - 507
  • [24] Sugammadex Versus Neostigmine for Reversal of Neuromuscular Blockade in Patients With Severe Renal Impairment: A Randomized, Double-Blinded Study
    Oh, Matthew W.
    Mohapatra, Shweta G.
    Pak, Taylor
    Hermawan, Aundree
    Chen, Chieh-An
    Thota, Bhavana
    Chen, Joy
    Siu, Eric
    Park, Jenny
    Moon, Tiffany S.
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2024, 138 (05) : 1043 - 1051
  • [25] Sugammadex versus Neostigmine for Reversal of Neuromuscular Blockade in Adults and Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Chhabra, Ridhi
    Gupta, Rachna
    Gupta, Lalit K.
    CURRENT DRUG SAFETY, 2024, 19 (01) : 33 - 43
  • [26] Sugammadex for reversal of neuromuscular block after rapid sequence intubation: a systematic review and economic assessment
    Chambers, D.
    Paulden, M.
    Paton, F.
    Heirs, M.
    Duffy, S.
    Hunter, J. M.
    Sculpher, M.
    Woolacott, N.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2010, 105 (05) : 568 - 575
  • [27] Cardiac Arrest in the Post-anesthesia Care Unit (PACU): Postoperative Recurrence of Neuromuscular Block After Sugammadex Reversal
    Katerenchuk, Vasyl
    Calcada, Alexandre
    Louzada, Raquel
    Rosinha, Daniela
    Batista, Ana C.
    Capelao, Andreia
    Cordeiro, Lisbete
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (01)
  • [28] Intraoperative reversal of neuromuscular block with sugammadex or neostigmine during extreme lateral interbody fusion, a novel technique for spine surgery
    Milan Adamus
    Lumir Hrabalek
    Tomas Wanek
    Tomas Gabrhelik
    Jana Zapletalova
    Journal of Anesthesia, 2011, 25 : 716 - 720
  • [29] Postoperative residual curarization after sugammadex reversal following a prolonged rocuronium infusion
    Lee, Jeong Han
    RAWAL MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 41 (04): : 511 - 513
  • [30] Intraoperative reversal of neuromuscular block with sugammadex or neostigmine during extreme lateral interbody fusion, a novel technique for spine surgery
    Adamus, Milan
    Hrabalek, Lumir
    Wanek, Tomas
    Gabrhelik, Tomas
    Zapletalova, Jana
    JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA, 2011, 25 (05) : 716 - 720