Postoperative Risk of Transfusion After Reversal of Residual Neuromuscular Block With Sugammadex Versus Neostigmine: A Retrospective Cohort Study

被引:2
|
作者
Schmidt, Marc T. [1 ]
Paredes, Stephania [2 ]
Rossler, Julian [1 ]
Mukhia, Rupashi [1 ]
Pu, Xuan [3 ]
Mao, Guangmei [3 ]
Turan, Alparslan [1 ,4 ]
Ruetzler, Kurt [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin, Anesthesiol Inst, Dept Outcomes Res, 9500 Euclid Ave,P-77, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[2] Cleveland Clin, Anesthesiol Inst, Cleveland, OH USA
[3] Cleveland Clin, Lerner Res Inst, Dept Quantitat Hlth Sci, Cleveland, OH USA
[4] Cleveland Clin, Anesthesiol Inst, Dept Gen Anesthesiol, Cleveland, OH USA
关键词
PARTIAL THROMBOPLASTIN TIME; ROCURONIUM; COMPLICATIONS; AGENT; CARE;
D O I
10.1213/ANE.0000000000006275
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND:Sugammadex and neostigmine are routinely used to reverse residual neuromuscular blocks at the end of surgery. Sugammadex has been linked with prolongation of laboratory coagulation markers, but clinical relevance on postoperative blood loss and transfusions remains unclear. METHODS:In this retrospective, single-center, cohort study, we analyzed medical records of adult patients having noncardiac surgery who were given sugammadex or neostigmine from May 2016 to December 2020. Our primary outcome was the incidence of any postoperative transfusion of red blood cells, and/or fresh-frozen plasma, and/or platelets. Secondary outcomes were duration of hospitalization, need for resurgery, and postoperative intensive care unit (ICU) admission. After propensity score weighting, the odds ratio (OR) for postoperative transfusion was assessed in both groups (sugammadex versus neostigmine) using a generalized estimation equation to count within-subject correlation weighted by the inverse propensity score. RESULTS:Out of 39,325 eligible surgeries, 33,903 surgeries in 29,062 patients were included in the analysis; with 4581 patients receiving sugammadex and 29,322 patients receiving neostigmine. The raw incidence of postoperative transfusion was 7.40% in sugammadex and 7.45% in the neostigmine group. After weighting by propensity score, the incidence of postoperative transfusion was 8.01% in the sugammadex and 7.38% in the neostigmine group (OR, 1.11 [95% confidence interval [CI], 0.97-1.26; P = .118]). There was no difference in duration of hospitalization and need for resurgery, but odds of postoperative ICU admission were significantly higher for patients receiving sugammadex than those receiving neostigmine (OR, 1.33 [98.33% CI, 1.17-1.52; P < .0001]). Our a priori planned analysis of coagulation laboratory parameters could not be completed because of a high amount of missing laboratory data. CONCLUSIONS:There is no statistically significant nor clinically important difference in the risk of postoperative transfusion in patients receiving sugammadex or neostigmine.
引用
收藏
页码:745 / 752
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Reversal of profound vecuronium-induced neuromuscular block under sevoflurane anesthesia: sugammadex versus neostigmine
    Hendrikus JM Lemmens
    Mohammad I El-Orbany
    James Berry
    Jovino Ben Morte
    Gavin Martin
    BMC Anesthesiology, 10
  • [12] Association of Intravenous Neostigmine and Anticholinergics or Sugammadex with Postoperative Delirium: A Retrospective Cohort Study
    Rossler, Julian
    Abramczyk, Emily
    Paredes, Stephania
    Anusic, Nikola
    Pu, Xuan
    Maheshwari, Kamal
    Turan, Alparslan
    Ruetzler, Kurt
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2025, 140 (01) : 110 - 118
  • [13] Reversal of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block with sugammadex is faster than reversal of cisatracurium-induced block with neostigmine
    Flockton, E. A.
    Mastronardi, P.
    Hunter, J. M.
    Gomar, C.
    Mirakhur, R. K.
    Aguilera, L.
    Giunta, F. G.
    Meistelman, C.
    Prins, M. E.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2008, 100 (05) : 622 - 630
  • [14] Sugammadex, a selective reversal medication for preventing postoperative residual neuromuscular blockade
    Abrishami, Amir
    Ho, Joyce
    Wong, Jean
    Yin, Ling
    Chung, Frances
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2009, (04):
  • [15] An appraisal of neostigmine versus sugammadex for neuromuscular blockade reversal in patients with a prior heart transplant
    Paredes, Stephania
    Torres, Vivian Hernandez
    Chaves-Cardona, Harold
    Matus, Mark
    Porter, Steven B.
    Renew, Johnathan Ross
    ANAESTHESIOLOGY INTENSIVE THERAPY, 2023, 55 (01) : 46 - 51
  • [16] Sugammadex and neostigmine dose-finding study for reversal of residual neuromuscular block at a train-of-four ratio of 0.2 (SUNDRO20)
    Kaufhold, N.
    Schaller, S. J.
    Staeuble, C. G.
    Baumueller, E.
    Ulm, K.
    Blobner, M.
    Fink, H.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2016, 116 (02) : 233 - 240
  • [17] Repeat dosing of rocuronium after reversal of neuromuscular block by sugammadex
    Matsuki, Goh
    Takahata, Osamu
    Iwasaki, Hiroshi
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 2011, 58 (08): : 769 - 770
  • [18] Repeat dosing of rocuronium after reversal of neuromuscular block by sugammadex
    Goh Matsuki
    Osamu Takahata
    Hiroshi Iwasaki
    Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, 2011, 58 : 769 - 770
  • [19] Sugammadex compared with neostigmine/glycopyrrolate for routine reversal of neuromuscular block: a systematic review and economic evaluation
    Paton, F.
    Paulden, M.
    Chambers, D.
    Heirs, M.
    Duffy, S.
    Hunter, J. M.
    Sculpher, M.
    Woolacott, N.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2010, 105 (05) : 558 - 567
  • [20] Effect of reversal of deep neuromuscular block with sugammadex or moderate block by neostigmine on shoulder pain in elderly patients undergoing robotic prostatectomy
    Williams, Wendell H., III
    Cata, Juan P.
    Lasala, Javier D.
    Navai, Neema
    Feng, Lei
    Gottumukkala, Vijaya
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2020, 124 (02) : 164 - 172