Knowledge bases, innovation and sustainability- When tradition meets novelty in the food industry

被引:1
作者
Grimsby, Sveinung [1 ]
机构
[1] Nofima As, Tromso, Norway
关键词
Traditional food; Food industry; Modes of innovation; Knowledge bases; Tacit knowledge; Explicit knowledge; Symbolic knowledge; Sustainability; MODES; PRODUCERS; CREATION; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.tifs.2023.104307
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
Background: The established food industry needs to introduce more sustainable products to reach UN goals on food consumption and production. Existing theory on modes of innovation is discussed in relation to two cases where detailed insights through new product development process is known. Scope and approach: This commentary is illustrated with a green plant -based and a blue fish -based product development case. These cases have been used to illustrate how knowledge bases affect product development. Key findings and conclusions: Modes of innovation in the established food industry vary from learning by doing to science and technology -based innovation. In line with existing theory, it is believed interpreters of knowledge are important actors for knowledge brokering, due to embodied tacit knowledge and common language not being shared within explicit and tacit knowledge actors. In this commentary, symbolic knowledge is added forming a modified triangle of knowledge surrounded by sustainability as a driver of innovation and new product development.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] A New Measurement Conception for the 'Doing-Using-Interacting' Mode of Innovation
    Alhusen, Harm
    Bennat, Tatjana
    Bizer, Kilian
    Cantner, Uwe
    Horstmann, Elaine
    Kalthaus, Martin
    Proeger, Till
    Sternberg, Rolf
    Topfer, Stefan
    [J]. RESEARCH POLICY, 2021, 50 (04)
  • [2] Asheim B., 2006, The Journal of Technology Transfer, V1, P163, DOI DOI 10.1007/S10961-005-5028-0
  • [3] Differentiated knowledge bases and varieties of regional innovation systems
    Asheirn, Bjorn
    [J]. INNOVATION-THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH, 2007, 20 (03) : 223 - 241
  • [4] Bigliardi Barbara, 2020, Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, V15, P97
  • [5] OUR COMMON FUTURE - CALL FOR ACTION
    BRUNDTLAND, GH
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION, 1987, 14 (04) : 291 - 294
  • [6] Beyond high tech: early adopters of open innovation in other industries
    Chesbrough, H
    Crowther, AK
    [J]. R & D MANAGEMENT, 2006, 36 (03) : 229 - 236
  • [7] ABSORPTIVE-CAPACITY - A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION
    COHEN, WM
    LEVINTHAL, DA
    [J]. ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1990, 35 (01) : 128 - 152
  • [8] STAGE-GATE SYSTEMS - A NEW TOOL FOR MANAGING NEW PRODUCTS
    COOPER, RG
    [J]. BUSINESS HORIZONS, 1990, 33 (03) : 44 - 54
  • [9] Dynamic Portfolio Management for New Product Development Companies can use a Value Based Scorecard, developed using proven, research-based criteria, to select and prioritize NPD projects effectively.
    Cooper, Robert G.
    Sommer, Anita F.
    [J]. RESEARCH-TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 2023, 66 (03) : 19 - 31
  • [10] Overcoming barriers to innovation in food and agricultural biotechnology
    Dahabieh, Matthew S.
    Broering, Stefanie
    Maine, Elicia
    [J]. TRENDS IN FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 79 : 204 - 213