Using silvopastoral systems for the mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions from livestock in the Colombian Amazon

被引:1
|
作者
Mavisoy, Henry [1 ,2 ]
Vallejos, Adrian Rolando Riascos [1 ]
Narvaez-Herrera, Juan Pablo [1 ]
Sanchez, Alvaro [1 ]
Fangueiro, David [2 ]
de Almeida, Andre M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Agroforestal & Acuicola Arapaima, Serv Nacl Aprendizaje SENA, Puerto Asis 861020, Putumayo, Colombia
[2] Univ Lisbon, LEAF Linking Landscape Environm Agr & Food Res Ctr, Associated Lab TERRA, Inst Super Agron, P-1349017 Lisbon, Portugal
关键词
Agroforestry; Climate change; Creole breed; Neutral carbon beef; Ecosystem services; CARBON FOOTPRINT; BEEF-CATTLE; PASTURE; DEFORESTATION; STORAGE; FORESTS; BALANCE; SOIL; ROOT;
D O I
10.1007/s10457-023-00912-5
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Silvopastoral systems (SPS) are strategic in neutralizing greenhouse gases (GHG) emissions in livestock production systems, particularly in the tropics. This research assessed the mitigation potential of SPS on the carbon footprint (CFP) neutralizing in one integrated livestock farm of cow-calf and pig production system in the Colombian Amazon. Annual carbon accumulation rate (ACAR) in MgCO(2)e ha(-1)y(-1), was evaluated on living above-ground biomass including trees and shrubs > 2 cm DBH and pasture, and leaf litter and below-ground biomass including coarse and fine roots, soil organic carbon 0-10 cm deep, and total ACAR adding up all components in live fences (LF), scattered trees (ST), fallows (FW), fodder bank (FB) and pastures (PT). The GHG emissions in MgCO(2)e ha(-1)y(-1) were accounted in CO2 from liming, urea, fuel, electricity, and supplementation, CH4 from enteric methane, manure, and organic fertilization and N2O from urine and manure. The C balance was obtained from the differences between ACAR of SPS on farm and the CFP per surface. Mean total ACAR expressed in MgC ha(-1)y(-1) were 9.0 +/- 4.6 in FW, 7.0 +/- 1.2 in LF, 5.5 +/- 0.8 in ST, 4.2 +/- 0.2 in FB and 2.9 +/- 0.1 in PT. Mean CFP was 3.7 MgCO(2)e ha(-1)y(-1), 5.3 MgCO(2)e Live Weight ha(-1)y(-1), and 23.6 MgCO(2)e Live Weight Gain y(-1). The CFP (area) can be neutralized with total ACAR value of 2.1 ha(-1) for LF, 1.6 ha(-1) for FW, 2.6 ha(-1) for ST, 3.5 ha(-1) for FB and 5.1 ha(-1) for PT. The Silvopastoral systems have a higher potential for neutralizing GHG emissions than pasture-based scenario when considering the ACAR in above-ground biomass.
引用
收藏
页码:337 / 352
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Transparency on greenhouse gas emissions from mining to enable climate change mitigation
    Azadi, Mehdi
    Northey, Stephen A.
    Ali, Saleem H.
    Edraki, Mansour
    NATURE GEOSCIENCE, 2020, 13 (02) : 100 - +
  • [32] Mitigation of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Agricultural Fields through Bioresource Management
    Khan, Rimsha
    Abbas, Amna
    Farooque, Aitazaz A.
    Abbas, Farhat
    Wang, Xander
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (09)
  • [33] Greenhouse gas emissions and mitigation potential from fertilizer manufacture and application in India
    Tirado, Reyes
    Gopikrishna, S. R.
    Krishnan, Rajesh
    Smith, Pete
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2010, 8 (03) : 176 - 185
  • [34] Mitigation of ammonia and greenhouse gas emissions from stored cattle slurry using acidifiers and chemical amendments
    Kavanagh, I
    Burchill, W.
    Healy, M. G.
    Fenton, O.
    Krol, D. J.
    Lanigan, G. J.
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 237
  • [35] Assessing greenhouse gas emissions from peatlands using vegetation as a proxy
    Couwenberg, John
    Thiele, Annett
    Tanneberger, Franziska
    Augustin, Juergen
    Baerisch, Susanne
    Dubovik, Dimitry
    Liashchynskaya, Nadzeya
    Michaelis, Dierk
    Minke, Merten
    Skuratovich, Arkadi
    Joosten, Hans
    HYDROBIOLOGIA, 2011, 674 (01) : 67 - 89
  • [36] Mitigating Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Crop Production and Management Practices, and Livestock: A Review
    Kabange, Nkulu Rolly
    Kwon, Youngho
    Lee, So-Myeong
    Kang, Ju-Won
    Cha, Jin-Kyung
    Park, Hyeonjin
    Dzorkpe, Gamenyah Daniel
    Shin, Dongjin
    Oh, Ki-Won
    Lee, Jong-Hee
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (22)
  • [37] Advances in the determination of forage and forestry production and greenhouse gas mitigation in silvopastoral systems in the Espinal Periestépico region of Argentina
    Montenegro, A.
    Teran, E. J.
    Torres, Y.
    Blazquez, F.
    Juliarena, M. P.
    Gyenge, J.
    AGROFORESTRY SYSTEMS, 2024, 98 (07) : 2041 - 2054
  • [38] Current available strategies to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions in livestock systems: an animal welfare perspective
    Llonch, P.
    Haskell, M. J.
    Dewhurst, R. J.
    Turner, S. P.
    ANIMAL, 2017, 11 (02) : 274 - 284
  • [39] The concordance between greenhouse gas emissions, livestock production and profitability of extensive beef farming systems
    Harrison, Matthew T.
    Cullen, Brendan R.
    Tomkins, Nigel W.
    McSweeney, Chris
    Cohn, Philip
    Eckard, Richard J.
    ANIMAL PRODUCTION SCIENCE, 2016, 56 (2-3) : 370 - 384
  • [40] EVALUATION OF GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS FROM THREE CONTRASTING INTEGRATED CROP AND LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION SYSTEMS DURING 1991-2016 IN GANSU OF CHINA
    Yan, Zhengang
    Hou, Fujiang
    Yan, Tianhai
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 2019, 56 (02): : 469 - 480