Creating a context for recipient vessel selection in deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction

被引:3
作者
Changchien, Chih-Hsuan [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Fang, Chien-Liang [1 ,3 ,5 ]
Hsu, Chin-Hao [1 ,5 ]
Yang, Hsin-Yi [4 ,5 ]
Lin, Yi-Ling [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Chia Yi Christian Hosp, Ditmanson Med Fdn, Dept Surg, Div Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Chia Yi City, Taiwan
[2] Asia Univ, Coll Med & Hlth Sci, Dept Med Lab Sci & Biotechnol, Taichung, Taiwan
[3] Asia Univ, Coll Med & Hlth Sci, Dept Food Nutr & Hlth Biotechnol, Taichung, Taiwan
[4] Chia Yi Christian Hosp, Ditmanson Med Fdn, Clin Med Res Ctr, Chia Yi City, Taiwan
[5] 539 Jhongsiao Rd, Chia Yi City 60002, Taiwan
关键词
Recipient vessels; Selection; DIEP flap; Breast reconstruction; INTERNAL MAMMARY VESSELS; ABDOMINAL FREE FLAPS; DIEP FLAPS; THORACOACROMIAL VESSELS; VENOUS CONGESTION; FREE TRAM; VEIN; COMPLICATIONS; AXILLARY; ANATOMY;
D O I
10.1016/j.bjps.2023.06.049
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: In autologous tissue breast reconstruction, recipient vessels are important for artery perfusion and venous drainage to ensure free flap survival. There are insufficient clinical outcomes to select efficient recipient vessels in bi-pedicled deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap reconstruction. Methods: We presented a retrospective observational series of 108 patients regarding the diameter, anastomosis time, and re-anastomosis rate in internal mammary (IM), circumflex scapular (CS), thoracodorsal (TD), thoracoacromial (TA), lateral thoracic (LT), and internal mammary perforator (IMP) vessels of bi-pedicled DIEP flaps for breast reconstruction after mastectomy. The outcomes were the vessel re-anastomosis rate, flap failure rate, vessel anastomosis time, and complications. Data were gleaned from the chi-square test, Fisher's test, and analysis of variance using Scheffe's test as a post hoc analysis. The level of significance was p < 0.05. Results: There were no significant differences in the diameters of the artery, first vein, and second vein across the recipient vessels (p > 0.05). However, the anastomosis time was longer in IM and TA than in CS, TD, and LT (p < 0.001). Also, there were no significant differences for re-anastomosis, flap necrosis, and fat necrosis among different recipient vessels (p > 0.05). Conclusions: Because of the altered mastectomy incisions, this study provides complete anatomical vascular properties and suggests that altering recipient vessel selection for bi-pedicled DIEP flaps can shorten anastomosis time and better conceal scars. (c) 2023 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:618 / 625
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Double Venous System Drainage in Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction: A Single-Surgeon Experience
    Boutros, Sean G.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2013, 131 (04) : 671 - 676
  • [32] Donor Site Sensitivity After Breast Reconstruction With Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator Flap
    Tindholdt, Tyge Tind
    Tonseth, Kim Alexander
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2009, 63 (02) : 143 - 147
  • [33] Stacked Profunda Artery Perforator Flap for Breast Reconstruction in Failed or Unavailable Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap
    Haddock, Nicholas T.
    Cho, Min-Jeong
    Gassman, Andrew
    Teotia, Sumeet S.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2019, 143 (03) : 488E - 494E
  • [34] LOW-RISE SCAR DEEP INFERIOR EPIGASTRIC ARTERY PERFORATOR FLAP FOR BREAST RECONSTRUCTION
    Akita, Shinsuke
    Mitsukawa, Nobuyuki
    Tokumoto, Hideki
    Kuriyama, Motone
    Kubota, Yoshitaka
    Kira, Tomoe
    Sasahara, Yoshitaro
    Sakakibara, Masahiro
    Nagashima, Takeshi
    Satoh, Kaneshige
    MICROSURGERY, 2015, 35 (06) : 451 - 456
  • [35] Preoperative Computed Tomographic Angiogram for Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction
    Masia, Jaume
    Kosutic, Damir
    Clavero, Juan A.
    Larranaga, Jose
    Vives, Lorena
    Pons, Gemma
    JOURNAL OF RECONSTRUCTIVE MICROSURGERY, 2010, 26 (01) : 21 - 28
  • [36] Advantages of Preoperative Computed Tomography in Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction
    Casey, William J., III
    Chew, Roderick T.
    Rebecca, Alanna M.
    Smith, Anthony A.
    Collins, Joseph M.
    Pockaj, Barbara A.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2009, 123 (04) : 1148 - 1155
  • [37] Lower abdominal bulge after deep inferior epigastric perforator flap (DIEP) breast reconstruction
    Nahabedian, MY
    Momen, B
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2005, 54 (02) : 124 - 129
  • [38] Modern approaches to alternative flap-based breast reconstruction: stacked deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps
    Garoosi, Kassra
    Kelson, Kate
    Winocour, Julian
    Mathes, David
    Kaoutzanis, Christodoulos
    PLASTIC AND AESTHETIC RESEARCH, 2024, 11
  • [39] Evidence-based Algorithms for Free Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Salvage in Autologous Breast Reconstruction
    Todd, Anna R.
    Alrajraji, Mawaddah
    Sawa, Kathryn
    Lipa, Joan E.
    Snell, Laura
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2025, 13 (01)
  • [40] The deep inferior epigastric perforator flap for breast reconstruction., the learning curve explored
    Busic, V.
    Das-Gupta, Rana
    Mesic, H.
    Begic, A.
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2006, 59 (06) : 580 - 584