Resting Stroop task: Evidence of task conflict in trials with no required response

被引：0
作者：
Hershman, Ronen [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Dadon, Gal [1 ,2 ]
Kiesel, Andrea [4 ]
Henik, Avishai [1 ,2 ]
机构：
[1] Ben Gurion Univ Negev, Dept Psychol, Beer Sheva, Israel
[2] Ben Gurion Univ Negev, Zelman Ctr Brain Sci, Beer Sheva, Israel
[3] Univ Innsbruck, Dept Psychol, Innrain 52f, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
[4] Univ Freiburg, Dept Psychol, Freiburg, Germany
来源：
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW | 2024年 / 31卷 / 01期
关键词：
Task conflict; Informational conflict; Stroop effect; Pupillometry; Cognitive control; STIMULUS; INTERFERENCE; ATTENTION; COLOR; BLINK; WORD; LOAD;
D O I：
10.3758/s13423-023-02354-7
中图分类号：
B841 [心理学研究方法];
学科分类号：
040201 ;
摘要：
In the typical Stroop task, participants are presented with color words written in different ink colors and are asked to respond to their color. It has been suggested that the Stroop task consists of two main conflicts: information conflict (color vs. word naming) and task conflict (respond to color vs. read the word). In the current study, we developed a novel task that includes both Response trials (i.e., trials in which a response is required) and Rest trials (i.e., trials in which no response is required or available) and investigated the existence of both information and task conflicts in Rest trials. We found evidence for task conflict in Response and also in Rest trials, while evidence for information conflict was only observed in Response trials. These results are in line with a model of task conflict that occurs independently of and prior to information conflict in the Stroop task.
引用
收藏
页码：353 / 360
页数：8
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] Prefrontal regions play a predominant role in imposing an attentional 'set': evidence from fMIRI
    Banich, MT
    Milham, MP
    Atchley, RA
    Cohen, NJ
    Webb, A
    Wszalek, T
    Kramer, AF
    Liang, ZP
    Barad, V
    Gullett, D
    Shah, C
    Brown, C
    [J]. COGNITIVE BRAIN RESEARCH, 2000, 10 (1-2): : 1 - 9
  • [2] INVESTIGATIONS OF THE FUNCTIONAL-ANATOMY OF ATTENTION USING THE STROOP TEST
    BENCH, CJ
    FRITH, CD
    GRASBY, PM
    FRISTON, KJ
    PAULESU, E
    FRACKOWIAK, RSJ
    DOLAN, RJ
    [J]. NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 1993, 31 (09) : 907 - 922
  • [3] Brain activation and pupil response during covert performance of the Stroop Color Word task
    Brown, GG
    Kindermann, SS
    Siegle, GJ
    Granholm, E
    Wong, EC
    Buxton, RB
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 1999, 5 (04) : 308 - 319
  • [4] Interference and facilitation effects during selective attention: An (H2O)-O-15 PET study of Stroop task performance
    Carter, CS
    Mintun, M
    Cohen, JD
    [J]. NEUROIMAGE, 1995, 2 (04) : 264 - 272
  • [5] On the role of stimulus-response and stimulus-stimulus compatibility in the Stroop effect
    De Houwer, J
    [J]. MEMORY & COGNITION, 2003, 31 (03) : 353 - 359
  • [6] Exploring relations between task conflict and informational conflict in the Stroop task
    Entel, Olga
    Tzelgov, Joseph
    Bereby-Meyer, Yoella
    Shahar, Nitzan
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH-PSYCHOLOGISCHE FORSCHUNG, 2015, 79 (06): : 913 - 927
  • [7] Selectivity in distraction by irrelevant featural singletons: Evidence for two forms of attentional capture
    Folk, CL
    Remington, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1998, 24 (03) : 847 - 858
  • [8] Evidence for task conflict in the Stroop effect
    Goldfarb, Liat
    Henik, Avishai
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2007, 33 (05) : 1170 - 1176
  • [9] Inspired by the past and looking to the future of the Stroop effect
    Henik, Avishai
    Bugg, Julie M.
    Goldfarb, Liat
    [J]. ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2018, 189 : 1 - 3
  • [10] Hershman R., 2023, CONTRIBUTION M UNPUB
1234