Quantitative flood hazard assessment methods: A review

被引:72
作者
Maranzoni, Andrea [1 ]
D'Oria, Marco [1 ]
Rizzo, Carmine [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Parma, Dept Engn & Architecture, Parco Area Sci 181-A, I-43124 Parma, Italy
来源
JOURNAL OF FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT | 2023年 / 16卷 / 01期
关键词
flood hazard assessment; flood hazard mapping; flood inundation modelling; flood risk management; hazard index; hazard rating; RISK-ASSESSMENT; MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES; CLIMATE-CHANGE; RIVER; AREAS; MAPS; VULNERABILITY; DAMAGE; UNCERTAINTY; CRITERIA;
D O I
10.1111/jfr3.12855
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Flood hazard assessment is a fundamental step in flood risk mapping. Quantitative assessment requires hydrodynamic modelling of the flooding process in order to calculate the spatial distribution of suitable flood hazard indicators representative of flooding intensity and frequency, hence its potential to result in harm. Flood hazard indicators are usually defined by combining relevant flooding parameters, mainly flood depth and flow velocity, but also flooding arrival time, flooding duration, sediment or contamination load, and so forth. A flood hazard classification is commonly introduced to assign a hazard level to areas potentially subject to flooding. This article presents a systematic review of quantitative methods proposed in the scientific literature or prescribed by government authorities to assess the hazard associated with natural or anthropic flooding. Flood hazard classification methods are listed and compared by specifying their underlying approach (heuristic, conceptual, empirical), the exposed element which they were designed for (people, buildings, vehicles, etc.), and their fields of application (river overflow, dam-break, levee breach, debris flow). Perspectives and future challenges in quantitative flood hazard analysis are also discussed. This review aims to help modellers and practitioners to select the most suitable flood hazard assessment method for the case study of interest.
引用
收藏
页数:31
相关论文
共 208 条
  • [11] Aleotti P, 2004, MANAG INFORMAT SYST, V9, P153
  • [12] Two-Dimensional Dam-Break Flood Analysis in Data-Scarce Regions: The Case Study of Chipembe Dam, Mozambique
    Alvarez, Manuel
    Puertas, Jeronimo
    Pena, Enrique
    Bermudez, Maria
    [J]. WATER, 2017, 9 (06):
  • [13] [Anonymous], 2019, OFFICIAL J FRENCH RE, V156
  • [14] Delimitation of flood areas based on a calibrated a DEM and geoprocessing: case study on the Uruguay River, Itaqui, southern Brazil
    Araujo, Paulo Victor N.
    Amaro, Venerando E.
    Silva, Robert M.
    Lopes, Alexandre B.
    [J]. NATURAL HAZARDS AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2019, 19 (01) : 237 - 250
  • [15] Probabilistic evaluation of flood hazard in urban areas using Monte Carlo simulation
    Aronica, G. T.
    Franza, F.
    Bates, P. D.
    Neal, J. C.
    [J]. HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2012, 26 (26): : 3962 - 3972
  • [16] Assessment and mapping of debris-flow risk in a small catchment in eastern Sicily through integrated numerical simulations and GIS
    Aronica, Giuseppe T.
    Biondi, Giovanni
    Brigandi, Giuseppina
    Cascone, Ernesto
    Lanza, Stefania
    Randazzo, Giovanni
    [J]. PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY OF THE EARTH, 2012, 49 : 52 - 63
  • [17] Estimation of flood inundation probabilities using global hazard indexes based on hydrodynamic variables
    Aronica, Giuseppe Tito
    Candela, Angela
    Fabio, Pamela
    Santoro, Mario
    [J]. PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY OF THE EARTH, 2012, 42-44 : 119 - 129
  • [18] Vehicles instability criteria for flood risk assessment of a street network
    Arrighi, Chiara
    Huybrechts, Nicolas
    Ouahsine, Abdellatif
    Chasse, Patrick
    Oumeraci, Hocine
    Castelli, Fabio
    [J]. SPATIAL DIMENSIONS OF WATER MANAGEMENT - REDISTRIBUTION OF BENEFITS AND RISKS, 2016, 373 : 143 - 146
  • [19] Aureli F., 2008, RIVER FLOW 2008 PROC, P729
  • [20] Adaptation planning for floods: a review of available tools
    Banks, James Carl
    Camp, Janey V.
    Abkowitz, Mark D.
    [J]. NATURAL HAZARDS, 2014, 70 (02) : 1327 - 1337