The Effect of Finishing and Polishing with Proprietary Vs Interchanged Polishing Kits on the Surface Roughness of Different Ceramic Materials

被引:3
|
作者
Irusa, Karina F. [1 ]
Albouy, Jean-Pierre [2 ]
Cook, Ryan [2 ]
Amaya-Pajares, Silvia [3 ]
Donovan, Terence [2 ]
机构
[1] Tufts Univ, Sch Dent Med, Dept Comprehens Care, Boston, MA 02111 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Div Comprehens Oral Hlth, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
[3] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Dept Restorat Dent, Portland, OR 97201 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY | 2023年 / 32卷 / 03期
关键词
Ceramics; polishing; surface roughness; zirconia; DENTAL CERAMICS; RESTORATIVE MATERIALS; HUMAN ENAMEL; WEAR; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1111/jopr.13533
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose To evaluate the surface roughness of glazed and polished monolithic ceramic materials and to use this as a baseline for comparison after adjustment and polishing with both the recommended kit for the specific materials as well as interchanged polishing kits. Material and methods Flat ceramic specimens (n = 150) were fabricated from IPS ZirCAD Prime, IPS E.max, and Vitabloc Mark II. The specimens were adjusted and polished using either the proprietary polishing kit for the material or interchanged kits. The surface roughness was objectively assessed using Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) and profilometer. Subjective assessment of surface finish was performed using a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Gravimetric weight loss of each sample was measured before and after polishing using a digital microscale. The mean surface roughness and standard deviation was calculated for each ceramic- polisher pair. A factorial ANOVA was used to compare the mean surface roughness values in nanometers between multiple groups (alpha = 0.05). The subjective results from the SEM were reported as descriptive statistics Results The zirconia polishing system produced surfaces with the lowest surface roughness regardless of the ceramic material. The polisher-ceramic combination was found to have a statistically significant effect on both Ra and RMS values when the AFM was used (p = 0.039 and 0.010, respectively). Conclusion The zirconia polishing system resulted in the lowest surface roughness values regardless of ceramic materials tested. The zirconia polishing system also did not result in significant gravimetric weight loss regardless of the ceramic material used.
引用
收藏
页码:267 / 272
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Impact of polishing system on surface roughness of different ceramic surfaces after various pretreatments and bracket debonding
    Rebecca Jungbauer
    Anja Liebermann
    Christian M. Hammer
    Daniel Edelhoff
    Peter Proff
    Bogna Stawarczyk
    Clinical Oral Investigations, 2023, 27 : 4389 - 4399
  • [32] The effects of finishing and polishing techniques on surface roughness and color stability of nanocomposites
    Gonulol, Nihan
    Yilmaz, Fikret
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2012, 40 : E64 - E70
  • [33] Surface conditioning methods and polishing techniques effect on surface roughness of a feldspar ceramic
    Sarac, Y. Sinasi
    Elekdag-Turk, Selma
    Sarac, Duygu
    Turk, Tamer
    ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2007, 77 (04) : 723 - 728
  • [34] Effect of Different Finishing/Polishing Systems on the Surface Roughness of Two Heat-Treated Composite Resins
    Lima, Gabrielle Ribeiro
    Baima Maluf, Nathalia Cardoso
    Carvalho Souza, Soraia de Fatima
    Macedo Paiva, Antonio Ernandes
    Souza, Erick Miranda
    Santana, Ivone Lima
    MATERIALS RESEARCH-IBERO-AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MATERIALS, 2011, 14 (02): : 142 - 145
  • [35] The Influence of Surface Roughening and Polishing on Microbial Biofilm Development on Different Ceramic Materials
    Abdalla, Mohamed Mahmoud
    Ali, Islam A. A.
    Khan, Khadija
    Mattheos, Nikos
    Murbay, Sukhdeep
    Matinlinna, Jukka Pekka
    Neelakantan, Prasanna
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2021, 30 (05): : 447 - 453
  • [36] Effects of polishing systems on the surface roughness of tooth-colored materials
    Erdemir, Ugur
    Yildiz, Esra
    Eren, Meltem Mert
    Ozsoy, Alev
    Topcu, Fulya Toksoy
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL SCIENCES, 2013, 8 (02) : 160 - 169
  • [37] Physical characteristics of ceramic/glasspolymer based CAD/CAM materials: Effect of finishing and polishing techniques
    Ekici, Mugem Asli
    Egilmez, Ferhan
    Cekic-Nagas, Isil
    Ergun, Gulfem
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED PROSTHODONTICS, 2019, 11 (02): : 128 - 137
  • [38] Effect of Air-Polishing and Different Post-Polishing Methods on Surface Roughness of Nanofill and Microhybrid Resin Composites
    Nemeth, Kinga Dorottya
    Haluszka, Dora
    Seress, Laszlo
    Lovasz, Balint Viktor
    Szalma, Jozsef
    Lempel, Edina
    POLYMERS, 2022, 14 (09)
  • [39] Comparative Evaluation of the Effect of Surface Polishing of a Glaze/composite Sealant and Different Polishing Systems on Surface Roughness of Three Composite Resin Type
    Bolat, Maria
    Stoleriu, Simona
    Iovan, Gianina
    Pancu, Galina
    Tofan, Nicoleta
    Sandu, Andrei Victor
    Andrian, Sorin
    MATERIALE PLASTICE, 2018, 55 (03) : 434 - 437
  • [40] Surface Roughness of Milled Lithium Disilicate With and Without Reinforcement After Finishing and Polishing: An In Vitro Study
    Brodine, Brian A.
    Korioth, Tom V.
    Morrow, Brian
    Shafter, Mohamed A.
    Hollis, Wainscott C.
    Cagna, David R.
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2021, 30 (03): : 245 - 251