The Effect of Finishing and Polishing with Proprietary Vs Interchanged Polishing Kits on the Surface Roughness of Different Ceramic Materials

被引:3
|
作者
Irusa, Karina F. [1 ]
Albouy, Jean-Pierre [2 ]
Cook, Ryan [2 ]
Amaya-Pajares, Silvia [3 ]
Donovan, Terence [2 ]
机构
[1] Tufts Univ, Sch Dent Med, Dept Comprehens Care, Boston, MA 02111 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Div Comprehens Oral Hlth, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
[3] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Dept Restorat Dent, Portland, OR 97201 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY | 2023年 / 32卷 / 03期
关键词
Ceramics; polishing; surface roughness; zirconia; DENTAL CERAMICS; RESTORATIVE MATERIALS; HUMAN ENAMEL; WEAR; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1111/jopr.13533
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose To evaluate the surface roughness of glazed and polished monolithic ceramic materials and to use this as a baseline for comparison after adjustment and polishing with both the recommended kit for the specific materials as well as interchanged polishing kits. Material and methods Flat ceramic specimens (n = 150) were fabricated from IPS ZirCAD Prime, IPS E.max, and Vitabloc Mark II. The specimens were adjusted and polished using either the proprietary polishing kit for the material or interchanged kits. The surface roughness was objectively assessed using Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) and profilometer. Subjective assessment of surface finish was performed using a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Gravimetric weight loss of each sample was measured before and after polishing using a digital microscale. The mean surface roughness and standard deviation was calculated for each ceramic- polisher pair. A factorial ANOVA was used to compare the mean surface roughness values in nanometers between multiple groups (alpha = 0.05). The subjective results from the SEM were reported as descriptive statistics Results The zirconia polishing system produced surfaces with the lowest surface roughness regardless of the ceramic material. The polisher-ceramic combination was found to have a statistically significant effect on both Ra and RMS values when the AFM was used (p = 0.039 and 0.010, respectively). Conclusion The zirconia polishing system resulted in the lowest surface roughness values regardless of ceramic materials tested. The zirconia polishing system also did not result in significant gravimetric weight loss regardless of the ceramic material used.
引用
收藏
页码:267 / 272
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effect of Finishing and Polishing on the Surface Roughness of Four Ceramic Materials after Occlusal Adjustment
    Amaya-Pajares, Silvia P.
    Ritter, Andre V.
    Resendiz, Carolina Vera
    Henson, Brett R.
    Culp, Lee
    Donovan, Terence E.
    JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC AND RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2016, 28 (06) : 382 - 396
  • [2] Effect finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of IPS Empress 2 ceramic
    Capelozza Boaventura, Juliana Maria
    Nishida, Rodrigo
    Elossais, Andre Afif
    Lima, Darlon Martins
    Santos Nunes Reis, Jose Mauricio
    Campos, Edson Alves
    de Andrade, Marcelo Ferrarezi
    ACTA ODONTOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2013, 71 (3-4) : 438 - 443
  • [3] Effect of finishing and polishing procedures on surface roughness of tooth-colored materials
    Celik, Cigdem
    Ozgunaltay, Gul
    QUINTESSENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 40 (09): : 783 - 789
  • [4] Effect of Different Finishing and Polishing Systems on the Surface Roughness of Composite Resins
    Balan, Adriana
    Sandu, Andrei-Victor
    Stoleriu, Simona
    Pintiliciuc, Veronica Serban
    Toma, Vasilica
    MATERIALE PLASTICE, 2015, 52 (01) : 55 - 57
  • [5] Surface Roughness of Monolithic and Layered Zirconia Restorations at Different Stages of Finishing and Polishing: An In Vitro Study
    Al Hamad, Khaled Q.
    Abu Al-Addous, Ahmad M.
    Al-Wahadni, Ahed M.
    Baba, Nadim Z.
    Goodacre, Brian J.
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2019, 28 (07): : 818 - 825
  • [6] The Effect of Finishing and Polishing Techniques on the Surface Roughness and the Color of Nanocomposite Resin Restorative Materials
    Avsar, Aysun
    Yuzbasioglu, Emir
    Sarac, Duygu
    ADVANCES IN CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2015, 24 (05): : 881 - 890
  • [7] THE EFFECT OF POLISHING ON SURFACE ROUGHNESS AND FRACTURE LOAD OF HYBRID AND RESIN NANOCERAMICS
    Sarikaya, Isil
    Gulec, Ceyda
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL DENTISTRY, 2019, 23 (01) : 64 - 69
  • [8] Surface Roughness and Hardness of CAD/CAM Ceramic Materials after Polishing with a Multipurpose Polishing Kit: An In Vitro Study
    Limpuangthip, Nareudee
    Poosanthanasarn, Ekaluck
    Salimee, Prarom
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2023, 17 (04) : 1075 - 1083
  • [9] Effect of the different finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of three different posterior composite resins
    Sahbaz, Cafer
    Bahsi, Emrullah
    Ince, Bayram
    Bakir, Elif Pinar
    Cellik, Omer
    SCANNING, 2016, 38 (05) : 448 - 454
  • [10] Surface roughness of five different dental ceramic core materials after grinding and polishing
    Kou, W
    Molin, M
    Sjögren, G
    JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 2006, 33 (02) : 117 - 124