Tailoring Gradient Methods for Differentially Private Distributed Optimization

被引:42
作者
Wang, Yongqiang [1 ]
Nedic, Angelia [2 ]
机构
[1] Clemson Univ, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Clemson, SC 29634 USA
[2] Arizona State Univ, Sch Elect Comp & Energy Engn, Tempe, AZ 85281 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Decentralized learning; decentralized optimization; differential privacy; gradient methods; CONVERGENCE; NETWORKS;
D O I
10.1109/TAC.2023.3272968
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Decentralized optimization is gaining increased traction due to its widespread applications in large-scale machine learning and multiagent systems. The same mechanism that enables its success, i.e., information sharing among participating agents, however, also leads to the disclosure of individual agents' private information, which is unacceptable when sensitive data are involved. As differential privacy is becoming a de facto standard for privacy preservation, recently results have emerged integrating differential privacy with distributed optimization. However, directly incorporating differential privacy design in existing distributed optimization approaches significantly compromises optimization accuracy. In this article, we propose to redesign and tailor gradient methods for differentially private distributed optimization, and propose two differential-privacy oriented gradient methods that can ensure both rigorous is an element of-differential privacy and optimality. The first algorithm is based on static-consensus-based gradient methods, and the second algorithm is based on dynamic-consensus (gradient-tracking) based distributed optimization methods and, hence, is applicable to general directed interaction graph topologies. Both algorithms can simultaneously ensure almost sure convergence to an optimal solution and a finite privacy budget, even when the number of iterations goes to infinity. To the best of authors' knowledge, this is the first time that both goals are achieved simultaneously. Numerical simulations using a distributed estimation problem and experimental results on a benchmark dataset confirm the effectiveness of the proposed approaches.
引用
收藏
页码:872 / 887
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   Distributed Spectrum Sensing for Cognitive Radio Networks by Exploiting Sparsity [J].
Bazerque, Juan Andres ;
Giannakis, Georgios B. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2010, 58 (03) :1847-1862
[2]   Concentrated Differential Privacy: Simplifications, Extensions, and Lower Bounds [J].
Bun, Mark ;
Steinke, Thomas .
THEORY OF CRYPTOGRAPHY, TCC 2016-B, PT I, 2016, 9985 :635-658
[3]  
Burbano-L DA, 2019, INT CONF ACOUST SPEE, P4310, DOI 10.1109/ICASSP.2019.8683597
[4]   ON A STOCHASTIC APPROXIMATION METHOD [J].
CHUNG, KL .
ANNALS OF MATHEMATICAL STATISTICS, 1954, 25 (03) :463-483
[5]  
Cortes J, 2016, IEEE DECIS CONTR P, P4252, DOI 10.1109/CDC.2016.7798915
[6]   NEXT: In-Network Nonconvex Optimization [J].
Di Lorenzo, Paolo ;
Scutari, Gesualdo .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL AND INFORMATION PROCESSING OVER NETWORKS, 2016, 2 (02) :120-136
[7]   Differentially Private Distributed Optimization via State and Direction Perturbation in Multiagent Systems [J].
Ding, Tie ;
Zhu, Shanying ;
He, Jianping ;
Chen, Cailian ;
Guan, Xinping .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 2022, 67 (02) :722-737
[8]   The Algorithmic Foundations of Differential Privacy [J].
Dwork, Cynthia ;
Roth, Aaron .
FOUNDATIONS AND TRENDS IN THEORETICAL COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2013, 9 (3-4) :211-406
[9]   Fundamental Technologies in Modern Speech Recognition [J].
Furui, Sadaoki ;
Deng, Li ;
Gales, Mark ;
Ney, Hermann ;
Tokuda, Keiichi .
IEEE SIGNAL PROCESSING MAGAZINE, 2012, 29 (06) :16-17
[10]  
Gade S, 2018, P AMER CONTR CONF, P1402, DOI 10.23919/ACC.2018.8430960