What are the research priorities for strengthening public health emergency preparedness and response in Africa?

被引:1
作者
Onwujekwe, Obinna [1 ,2 ]
Mbachu, Chinyere [1 ,3 ]
Okeibunor, Joseph [4 ]
Ezema, Godwin Uchenna [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Ejiofor, Nonso [4 ]
Braka, Fiona [4 ]
Thiam, Adama [4 ]
Koua, Etien Luc [4 ]
Chamla, Dick [4 ]
Gueye, Abdou Salam [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nigeria, Coll Med, Dept Pharmacol & Therapeut, Hlth Policy Res Grp, Enugu 400001, Nigeria
[2] Univ Nigeria, Coll Med, Dept Hlth Adm & Management, Enugu 400001, Nigeria
[3] Univ Nigeria, Dept Community Med, Coll Med, Enugu 400001, Nigeria
[4] World Hlth Org Reg Off Africa AFRO, Brazzaville, Rep Congo
[5] Enugu State Primary Healthcare Dev Agcy, Enugu, Nigeria
关键词
Emergency preparedness and response; Prioritization; Research priority-setting; African region; DISEASE; BURDEN;
D O I
10.1186/s12961-023-01059-6
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundResearch evidence is needed to strengthen capacities in emergency preparedness and response (EPR). However, the absence of a clear research agenda limits the optimal use of research evidence. This paper reports on the prioritization of research questions and topics that could contribute to evidence-informed strengthening of EPR capacities in the African region.MethodsThe priority-setting consisted of desk review and stakeholder consultation workshop. Twenty-nine people participated in the workshop, including representatives from WHO regional office and EPR focal points in Africa, representatives of research institutions, and partners from Science for Africa Foundation, United Nations Children's Fund and Africa Center for Disease Control. Modified Delphi technique was used to systematically arrive at specific and cross-cutting research priorities in the three broad areas of the EPR, which are program Implementation, Clinical and Epidemiology. The research questions/topics were ranked on five-point Likert scale (1 = very low to 5 = very high) based on seven agreed-on criteria. Research priority score was calculated for each question as the mean of the criteria scores.ResultsA total of 123 research questions comprising, 29 on Epidemiology, 22 on Clinical, 23 on program Implementation, and 49 on cross-cutting issues were ranked. The top ten research priorities were: knowledge and skills of healthcare workers in detecting and responding effectively to disease outbreaks; quality of data (accuracy, timeliness, completeness) for epidemic prone diseases; determinants of vaccine hesitancy; determinants of infection transmission among health care workers during PHE; effective measures for protecting health workers from highly infectious pathogens in PHE; strategies to improve the effectiveness of contact tracing for epidemic prone diseases; effectiveness of current case definitions as screening tools for epidemic and pandemic prone diseases; measures to strengthen national and sub-national laboratory capacity for timely disease confirmation within the Integrated Diseases Surveillance and Response framework; factors affecting prompt data sharing on epidemic-prone diseases; and effective strategies for appropriate community participation in EPR.ConclusionsThe collaborative multi-stakeholder workshop produced a starting list of priority research questions and topics for strengthening EPR capacities in Africa. Action needs to be taken to continuously update the research agenda and support member States to contextualize the research priorities and commission research for timely generation and uptake of evidence.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] WHAT YOU SEE IS WHAT YOU GET? ENHANCING METHODOLOGICAL TRANSPARENCY IN MANAGEMENT RESEARCH
    Aguinis, Herman
    Ramani, Ravi S.
    Alabduljader, Nawaf
    [J]. ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT ANNALS, 2018, 12 (01) : 83 - 110
  • [2] A global research agenda for family planning: results of an exercise for setting research priorities
    Ali, Moazzam
    Seuc, Armando
    Rahimi, Asma
    Festina, Mario
    Temmerman, Marleen
    [J]. BULLETIN OF THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION, 2014, 92 (02) : 93 - 98
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2020, Sweden - Research And Development Expenditure, P2020
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2014, EC IMP 2014 EB EP SH
  • [5] Level of emergency and disaster preparedness of public hospitals in Northwest Ethiopia: A cross-sectional study
    Ayenew, Temesgen
    Tassew, Sheganew Fetene
    Workneh, Belayneh Shetie
    [J]. AFRICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2022, 12 (03) : 246 - 251
  • [6] Systematic review of priority setting studies in health research in the Islamic Republic of Iran
    Badakhshan, Abbas
    Arab, Mohammad
    Rashidian, Arash
    Gholipour, Mahin
    Mohebbi, Elham
    Zendehdel, Kazem
    [J]. EASTERN MEDITERRANEAN HEALTH JOURNAL, 2018, 24 (08) : 753 - 769
  • [7] Health research priority setting in Zambia: a stock taking of approaches conducted from 1998 to 2015
    Chanda-Kapata, Pascalina
    Ngosa, William
    Hamainza, Busiku
    Kapiriri, Lydia
    [J]. HEALTH RESEARCH POLICY AND SYSTEMS, 2016, 14
  • [8] EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF GROUP OPINION - DELPHI METHOD
    DALKEY, N
    [J]. FUTURES, 1969, 1 (05) : 408 - 426
  • [9] Setting research priorities across science, technology, and health sectors: the Tanzania experience
    de Haan, Sylvia
    Kingamkono, Rose
    Tindamanyire, Neema
    Mshinda, Hassan
    Makandi, Harun
    Tibazarwa, Flora
    Kubata, Bruno
    Montorzi, Gabriela
    [J]. HEALTH RESEARCH POLICY AND SYSTEMS, 2015, 13
  • [10] Defining consensus: A systematic review recommends methodologic criteria for reporting of Delphi studies
    Diamond, Ivan R.
    Grant, Robert C.
    Feldman, Brian M.
    Pencharz, Paul B.
    Ling, Simon C.
    Moore, Aideen M.
    Wales, Paul W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2014, 67 (04) : 401 - 409