Feedback on Written Assessments in Universities: A Topography of Literature

被引:0
作者
Torrisi-Steele, Geraldine [1 ]
Carim, Guido, Jr. [3 ]
Morrison, Clare [2 ]
Venema, Sven [1 ]
Co, Jomelson [3 ]
机构
[1] Griffith Univ, Sch Informat & Commun Technol, Nathan, Qld, Australia
[2] Griffith Univ, Sch Environm & Sci, Nathan, Qld, Australia
[3] Griffith Univ, Nathan, Qld, Australia
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADULT EDUCATION AND TECHNOLOGY-IJAET | 2023年 / 14卷 / 01期
关键词
Assessment; Feedback; Higher Education; Literature Review; SQLR; Written Assessment; TECHNOLOGY; PERCEPTIONS; STUDENTS;
D O I
10.4018/IJAET.316540
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
In higher education, the role of assessment has evolved from serving only the purpose of evaluation of the outcomes of the learning process to assessment as part of the learning purposes. Summative or formative, the potential of assessment to facilitate learning is now recognised. Feedback is one of the most influential factors on learning but is also one of the least satisfactory elements of the student experience. How has interest in, understanding of, and implementation of feedback changed over time? What are the general characteristics of feedback implementation found in literature? To what productive directions might future research feedback on assessment take? To gain these insights, a systematic quantitative review of literature on feedback on written assessment in higher education was undertaken, revealing that feedback as a field of inquiry, despite burgeoning interest, remains nascent, mostly 'stuck in old ways'.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] 'Are you listening please?' The advantages of electronic audio feedback compared to written feedback
    Lunt, Tom
    Curran, John
    ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2010, 35 (07) : 759 - 769
  • [22] Feedback after OSCE: A comparison of face to face versus an enhanced written feedback
    Chin Fang Ngim
    Paul Douglas Fullerton
    Vanassa Ratnasingam
    Valliammai Jayanthi Thirunavuk Arasoo
    Nisha Angela Dominic
    Cindy Pei Sze Niap
    Sivakumar Thurairajasingam
    BMC Medical Education, 21
  • [23] Feedback after OSCE: A comparison of face to face versus an enhanced written feedback
    Ngim, Chin Fang
    Fullerton, Paul Douglas
    Ratnasingam, Vanassa
    Arasoo, Valliammai Jayanthi Thirunavuk
    Dominic, Nisha Angela
    Niap, Cindy Pei Sze
    Thurairajasingam, Sivakumar
    BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [24] The Impact of Video Feedback on Student Assessments and Performance
    Ketchum, Cheri
    Phompheng, Elaine
    Yeats, Chelsey
    LaFave, Daria
    Hardy, James
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DISTANCE EDUCATION, 2022, 36 (04) : 288 - 301
  • [25] Interplay among technical, socio-emotional and personal factors in written feedback research
    Chong, Ivan
    ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2018, 43 (02) : 185 - 196
  • [26] Quality of Feedback in Higher Education: A Review of Literature
    Haughney, Kathryn
    Wakeman, Shawnee
    Hart, Laura
    EDUCATION SCIENCES, 2020, 10 (03):
  • [27] Written feedback in intercultural doctoral supervision: a case study
    Xu, Linlin
    TEACHING IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2017, 22 (02) : 239 - 255
  • [28] The Quality of Written Feedback by Attendings of Internal Medicine Residents
    Jackson, Jeffrey L.
    Kay, Cynthia
    Jackson, Wilkins C.
    Frank, Michael
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2015, 30 (07) : 973 - 978
  • [29] Student perceptions of hidden messages in teacher written feedback
    Hyland, Ken
    STUDIES IN EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION, 2013, 39 (03) : 180 - 187
  • [30] Closing the feedback loop? Iterative feedback between tutor and student in coursework assessments
    Barker, Martin
    Pinard, Michelle
    ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2014, 39 (08) : 899 - 915