The impact of private equity investment and renewable energy on environmental degradation: evidence from BRICS countries

被引:3
|
作者
Malik, Kunjana [1 ]
Sharma, Sakshi [2 ]
机构
[1] SPJIMR, Dept Finance & Econ, Mumbai, India
[2] Jawaharlal Nehru Univ, Atal Bihari Vajpee Sch Management & Entrepreneursh, New Delhi, India
关键词
Private equity; Environmental degradation; PMG; ARDL; STIRPAT; Renewable energy; Technological patents; FOREIGN DIRECT-INVESTMENT; EXTENDED STIRPAT MODEL; CARBON EMISSIONS; CO2; EMISSIONS; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; PANEL COINTEGRATION; CAUSAL DYNAMICS; KUZNETS CURVE; FDI INFLOWS; CONSUMPTION;
D O I
10.1108/IJESM-03-2023-0010
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
PurposeLarge-scale industrialization, growth and development have come at the cost of severe environmental degradation, primarily measured in terms of carbon dioxide emissions. Apart from the several measures taken to reduce enviornmental degradation, provision of private capital is a necessity apart from the public capital. There is a debate on impact of carbon dioxide emissions with increase in affluence, technology, population and renewable energy. The purpose of the study is to look into the role of private equity investment on renewable energy and technological patents. Design/methodology/approachThe study extends the use of stochastic impact by regression on population, affluence and technology model to include another factor for investments and capital, i.e. private equity along with renewable energy, population, technology and GDP growth on carbon emissions for the BRICS countries. The time period for the study is from 2002 to 2021, and the relationship between the variables has been tested using pooled mean group/autoregressive distributed lag, fully modified ordinary least squares and panel quantile regression. FindingsFirst, the results depict a log-run relationship between the variables across the panel using cointegration. Private equity investments do not have a significant impact on carbon emissions. The study proposes important policy implications. There are two schools of thought on the impact of private equity on carbon emissions. For example, inherently private equity investments come with higher stakes and a shorter holding period because of which their primary focus remains on having higher returns instead of responsible investing. However, as private equity adds up to capital, which leads to an increase in productivity and eventually higher economic growth, this could affect carbon emissions. This study supports the first thought. Additionally, renewable energy also affects carbon emissions positively. The policymakers should look into the role and intent of the private equity investors in green investments and invest in technologies and patents that can lead to energy consumption. Originality/valueThe paper is the first of its kind, to the best of the authors' knowledge, to look into the impact of private equity on renewable energy and technological patents.
引用
收藏
页码:685 / 706
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Unveiling the spillover effects of democracy and renewable energy consumption on the environmental quality of BRICS countries: A new insight from different quantile regression approaches
    Ghosh, Smarnika
    Hossain, Md. Shaddam
    Voumik, Liton Chandra
    Raihan, Asif
    Ridzuan, Abdul Rahim
    Esquivias, Miguel Angel
    RENEWABLE ENERGY FOCUS, 2023, 46 : 222 - 235
  • [32] Does foreign direct investment and environmental degradation matter for poverty? Evidence from developing countries
    Dhrifi, Abdelhafidh
    Jaziri, Raouf
    Alnahdi, Saleh
    STRUCTURAL CHANGE AND ECONOMIC DYNAMICS, 2020, 52 : 13 - 21
  • [33] The capital investment channel of environmental improvement: evidence from BRICS
    Mesagan, Ekundayo P.
    Isola, Wakeel A.
    Ajide, Kazeem B.
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 21 (04) : 1561 - 1582
  • [34] Renewable energy consumption in Coastline Mediterranean Countries: impact of environmental degradation and housing policy
    Alola, Andrew Adewale
    Alola, Uju Violet
    Akadiri, Seyi Saint
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2019, 26 (25) : 25789 - 25801
  • [35] Financing clean energy projects: New empirical evidence from major investment countries
    Raghutla, Chandrashekar
    Shahbaz, Muhammad
    Chittedi, Krishna Reddy
    Jiao, Zhilun
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2021, 169 (169) : 231 - 241
  • [36] The impact of shadow economy on environmental degradation: empirical evidence from Pakistan
    Baloch, Amdadullah
    Shah, Said Zamin
    Rasheed, Somaiya
    Rasheed, Balach
    GEOJOURNAL, 2022, 87 (03) : 1887 - 1912
  • [37] The Impact of Renewable Energy on the Environment and Socio-economic Welfare: Empirical Evidence from OECD Countries
    Ferhi, Afifa
    Helali, Kamel
    JOURNAL OF THE KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY, 2024, 15 (01) : 4776 - 4799
  • [38] On the nexus between real income, renewable energy consumption, and environmental sustainability on life expectancy for BRICS-T countries: Accessing evidence from quantile regression
    Dam, Mehmet M.
    Kaya, Funda
    Bekun, Festus V.
    NATURAL RESOURCES FORUM, 2024, 48 (04) : 1109 - 1135
  • [39] Which factors influence the decisions of renewable energy investors? Empirical evidence from OECD and BRICS countries
    Kilinc-Ata, Nurcan
    Dolmatov, Ilya A.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2023, 30 (01) : 1720 - 1736
  • [40] A review of renewable energy investment in the BRICS countries: History, models, problems and solutions
    Zeng, Shihong
    Liu, Yuchen
    Liu, Chao
    Nan, Xin
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2017, 74 : 860 - 872