Integrating Multi-Criteria Techniques in Life-Cycle Tools for the Circular Bioeconomy Transition of Agri-Food Waste Biomass: A Systematic Review

被引:15
作者
Romero-Perdomo, Felipe [1 ,2 ]
Gonzalez-Curbelo, Miguel Angel [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ EAN, Fac Ingn, Dept Ciencias Basicas, Bogota 110221, Colombia
[2] Corp Colombiana Invest Agr AGROSAVIA, Mosquera 250047, Colombia
关键词
circular economy; sustainable agriculture; multi-criteria decision making; TOPSIS; stakeholders; social LCA; life-cycle costing; bioenergy; biorefinery; SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT; DECISION-ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY; ASSESSMENT LCA; METHODOLOGY; MANAGEMENT; FRAMEWORK; IMPACTS; TOPSIS; PRIORITIZATION;
D O I
10.3390/su15065026
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Agri-food waste biomass (AWB) is consolidating as a relevant bioresource for supplying material products and energy in a circular bioeconomy. However, its recovery and sustainable processing present trade-offs that must be understood. The integration of multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) into life-cycle assessment (LCA) tools has emerged as a novel way to address this challenge. This paper aims to conduct a systematic literature review to critically synthesize how MCDA has been integrated into LCA in an assessment framework and how helpful it is in AWB's circular bioeconomy transition. The literature shows that the most studied AWBs are rice husk, sugarcane bagasse, and household food waste. These are processed through the technologies of composting, anaerobic digestion, and pyrolysis for applications such as biofuels, bioenergy, and soil amendment. Environmental LCA (E-LCA) is the most widely used LCA tool, while both the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and the technique for ordering preference by similarity to the ideal solution (TOPSIS) are the most applied techniques for MCDA. The current trend of integrating MCDA into LCA does not fully cover the LCA phases, favoring solely the impact assessment phase and indicating that the other phases are overlooked. The potential and involvement of the stakeholders are partially explored. Although there are holistic sustainability assessments, the social implications are rarely considered. The number of MCDA/LCA studies is expected to increase, assessments at the micro-, meso-, and macro-scales to become more articulated, and the impact of the results to become more aligned with government and company goals.
引用
收藏
页数:27
相关论文
共 151 条
  • [71] Do we need a 'circular society'? Competing narratives of the circular economy in the French food sector
    Leipold, Sina
    Weldner, Kaja
    Hohl, Marius
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2021, 187
  • [72] Systematic assessment of triticale-based biorefinery strategies: environmental evaluation using life cycle assessment
    Liard, Gladys
    Lesage, Pascal
    Samson, Rejean
    Stuart, Paul R.
    [J]. BIOFUELS BIOPRODUCTS & BIOREFINING-BIOFPR, 2018, 12 : S60 - S72
  • [73] Lim C.H., 2022, VALUE CHAIN BIOFUELS, VVolume 1, P429
  • [74] Multi-objective lifecycle optimization for oil palm fertilizer formulation: A hybrid P-graph and TOPSIS approach
    Lim, Juin Yau
    How, Bing Shen
    Teng, Sin Yong
    Leong, Wei Dong
    Tang, Jiang Ping
    Lam, Hon Loong
    Yoo, Chang Kyoo
    [J]. RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2021, 166 (166)
  • [75] Review of waste biorefinery development towards a circular economy: From the perspective of a life cycle assessment
    Liu, Yang
    Lyu, Yizheng
    Tian, Jinping
    Zhao, Jialing
    Ye, Ning
    Zhang, Yongming
    Chen, Lujun
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2021, 139
  • [76] Lopes R., 2021, CIRC EC SUSTAIN, V1, P873, DOI [10.1007/s43615-021-00042-z, DOI 10.1007/S43615-021-00042-Z]
  • [77] Assessing the social life cycle impacts of circular economy
    Luthin, Anna
    Traverso, Marzia
    Crawford, Robert H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2023, 386
  • [78] Life Cycle Assessment and Multi-criteria Decision Analysis: Selection of a strategy for domestic food waste management in Rio de Janeiro
    Maia Angelo, Ana Carolina
    Saraiva, Anna Bernstad
    Namorado Climaco, Joao Carlos
    Infante, Carlos Eduardo
    Valle, Rogerio
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 143 : 744 - 756
  • [79] How to design and realize participation of stakeholders in MCDA processes? A framework for selecting an appropriate approach
    Marttunen, Mika
    Mustajoki, Jyri
    Dufva, Mikko
    Karjalainen, Timo P.
    [J]. EURO JOURNAL ON DECISION PROCESSES, 2015, 3 (1-2) : 187 - 214
  • [80] Advances in Circular Bioeconomy Technologies: From Agricultural Wastewater to Value-Added Resources
    Mehta, Nidhi
    Shah, Kinjal J.
    Lin, Yu-, I
    Sun, Yongjun
    Pan, Shu-Yuan
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTS, 2021, 8 (03) : 1 - 23