Integrating Multi-Criteria Techniques in Life-Cycle Tools for the Circular Bioeconomy Transition of Agri-Food Waste Biomass: A Systematic Review

被引:15
作者
Romero-Perdomo, Felipe [1 ,2 ]
Gonzalez-Curbelo, Miguel Angel [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ EAN, Fac Ingn, Dept Ciencias Basicas, Bogota 110221, Colombia
[2] Corp Colombiana Invest Agr AGROSAVIA, Mosquera 250047, Colombia
关键词
circular economy; sustainable agriculture; multi-criteria decision making; TOPSIS; stakeholders; social LCA; life-cycle costing; bioenergy; biorefinery; SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT; DECISION-ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY; ASSESSMENT LCA; METHODOLOGY; MANAGEMENT; FRAMEWORK; IMPACTS; TOPSIS; PRIORITIZATION;
D O I
10.3390/su15065026
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Agri-food waste biomass (AWB) is consolidating as a relevant bioresource for supplying material products and energy in a circular bioeconomy. However, its recovery and sustainable processing present trade-offs that must be understood. The integration of multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) into life-cycle assessment (LCA) tools has emerged as a novel way to address this challenge. This paper aims to conduct a systematic literature review to critically synthesize how MCDA has been integrated into LCA in an assessment framework and how helpful it is in AWB's circular bioeconomy transition. The literature shows that the most studied AWBs are rice husk, sugarcane bagasse, and household food waste. These are processed through the technologies of composting, anaerobic digestion, and pyrolysis for applications such as biofuels, bioenergy, and soil amendment. Environmental LCA (E-LCA) is the most widely used LCA tool, while both the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and the technique for ordering preference by similarity to the ideal solution (TOPSIS) are the most applied techniques for MCDA. The current trend of integrating MCDA into LCA does not fully cover the LCA phases, favoring solely the impact assessment phase and indicating that the other phases are overlooked. The potential and involvement of the stakeholders are partially explored. Although there are holistic sustainability assessments, the social implications are rarely considered. The number of MCDA/LCA studies is expected to increase, assessments at the micro-, meso-, and macro-scales to become more articulated, and the impact of the results to become more aligned with government and company goals.
引用
收藏
页数:27
相关论文
共 151 条
  • [21] Perspectives and Challenges on Sustainability: Drivers, Opportunities and Policy Implications in Universities
    D'Adamo, Idiano
    Gastaldi, Massimo
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (04)
  • [22] Assessing the relation between waste management policies and circular economy goals
    D'Adamo, Idiano
    Mazzanti, Massimiliano
    Morone, Piergiuseppe
    Rosa, Paolo
    [J]. WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2022, 154 : 27 - 35
  • [23] Bioeconomy of Sustainability: Drivers, Opportunities and Policy Implications
    D'Adamo, Idiano
    Gastaldi, Massimo
    Morone, Piergiuseppe
    Rosa, Paolo
    Sassanelli, Claudio
    Settembre-Blundo, Davide
    Shen, Yichen
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (01)
  • [24] Green, circular, bio economy: A comparative analysis of sustainability avenues
    D'Amato, D.
    Droste, N.
    Allen, B.
    Kettunen, M.
    Laehtinen, K.
    Korhonen, J.
    Leskinen, P.
    Matthies, B. D.
    Toppinen, A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 168 : 716 - 734
  • [25] From social impact subcategories to human health: an application of multivariate analysis on S-LCA
    de Araujo, Jaylton Bonacina
    Frega, Jose Roberto
    Ugaya, Cassia Maria Lie
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2021, 26 (07) : 1471 - 1493
  • [26] Life cycle tools combined with multi-criteria and participatory methods for agricultural sustainability: Insights from a systematic and critical review
    De Luca, Anna Irene
    Iofrida, Nathalie
    Leskinen, Pekka
    Stillitano, Teodora
    Falcone, Giacomo
    Strano, Alfio
    Gulisano, Giovanni
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 595 : 352 - 370
  • [27] Life cycle cost analysis of agri-food products: A systematic review
    Degieter, Margo
    Gellynck, Xavier
    Goyal, Shashank
    Ott, Denise
    De Steur, Hans
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 850
  • [28] Searching for evidence or approval? A commentary on database search in systematic reviews and alternative information retrieval methodologies
    Delaney, Aogan
    Tamas, Peter A.
    [J]. RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS, 2018, 9 (01) : 124 - 131
  • [29] A sustainability assessment for use on land or wastewater treatment of the digestate from bio-waste
    Di Maria, Francesco
    Sisani, Federico
    [J]. WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2019, 87 : 741 - 750
  • [30] Dias L.C., 2019, New Perspectives in Multiple Criteria Decision Making, VVolume 1, P315, DOI [10.1007/978-3-030-11482-412, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-11482-4_12]