Integrating Multi-Criteria Techniques in Life-Cycle Tools for the Circular Bioeconomy Transition of Agri-Food Waste Biomass: A Systematic Review

被引:15
作者
Romero-Perdomo, Felipe [1 ,2 ]
Gonzalez-Curbelo, Miguel Angel [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ EAN, Fac Ingn, Dept Ciencias Basicas, Bogota 110221, Colombia
[2] Corp Colombiana Invest Agr AGROSAVIA, Mosquera 250047, Colombia
关键词
circular economy; sustainable agriculture; multi-criteria decision making; TOPSIS; stakeholders; social LCA; life-cycle costing; bioenergy; biorefinery; SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT; DECISION-ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY; ASSESSMENT LCA; METHODOLOGY; MANAGEMENT; FRAMEWORK; IMPACTS; TOPSIS; PRIORITIZATION;
D O I
10.3390/su15065026
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Agri-food waste biomass (AWB) is consolidating as a relevant bioresource for supplying material products and energy in a circular bioeconomy. However, its recovery and sustainable processing present trade-offs that must be understood. The integration of multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) into life-cycle assessment (LCA) tools has emerged as a novel way to address this challenge. This paper aims to conduct a systematic literature review to critically synthesize how MCDA has been integrated into LCA in an assessment framework and how helpful it is in AWB's circular bioeconomy transition. The literature shows that the most studied AWBs are rice husk, sugarcane bagasse, and household food waste. These are processed through the technologies of composting, anaerobic digestion, and pyrolysis for applications such as biofuels, bioenergy, and soil amendment. Environmental LCA (E-LCA) is the most widely used LCA tool, while both the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and the technique for ordering preference by similarity to the ideal solution (TOPSIS) are the most applied techniques for MCDA. The current trend of integrating MCDA into LCA does not fully cover the LCA phases, favoring solely the impact assessment phase and indicating that the other phases are overlooked. The potential and involvement of the stakeholders are partially explored. Although there are holistic sustainability assessments, the social implications are rarely considered. The number of MCDA/LCA studies is expected to increase, assessments at the micro-, meso-, and macro-scales to become more articulated, and the impact of the results to become more aligned with government and company goals.
引用
收藏
页数:27
相关论文
共 151 条
  • [111] How to advance regional circular bioeconomy systems? Identifying barriers, challenges, drivers, and opportunities
    Salvador, Rodrigo
    Barros, Murillo Vetroni
    Donner, Mechthild
    Brito, Paulo
    Halog, Anthony
    Francisco, Antonio C. De
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, 2022, 32 : 248 - 269
  • [112] Systematic assessment of triticale-based biorefinery strategies: techno-economic analysis to identify investment opportunities
    Sanaei, Shabnam
    Stuart, Paul R.
    [J]. BIOFUELS BIOPRODUCTS & BIOREFINING-BIOFPR, 2018, 12 : S46 - S59
  • [113] Utilization of agricultural waste biomass and recycling toward circular bioeconomy
    Sarangi, Prakash Kumar
    Subudhi, Sanjukta
    Bhatia, Latika
    Saha, Koel
    Mudgil, Divya
    Shadangi, Krushna Prasad
    Srivastava, Rajesh K.
    Pattnaik, Bhabjit
    Arya, Raj Kumar
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2023, 30 (04) : 8526 - 8539
  • [114] The role of biomass and bioenergy in a future bioeconomy: Policies and facts
    Scarlat, Nicolae
    Dallemand, Jean-Francois
    Monforti-Ferrario, Fabio
    Nita, Viorel
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL DEVELOPMENT, 2015, 15 : 3 - 34
  • [115] The significance of biomass in a circular economy
    Sherwood, James
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 300
  • [116] Innovations for sustainable development: Moving toward a sustainable future
    Silvestre, Bruno S.
    Tirca, Diana Mihaela
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 208 : 325 - 332
  • [117] An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies
    Singh, Rajesh Kumar
    Murty, H. R.
    Gupta, S. K.
    Dikshit, A. K.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2009, 9 (02) : 189 - 212
  • [118] Environmental sustainability in the food-energy-water-health nexus: A new methodology and an application to food waste in a circular economy
    Slorach, Peter C.
    Jeswani, Harish K.
    Cuellar-Franca, Rosa
    Azapagic, Adisa
    [J]. WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2020, 113 : 359 - 368
  • [119] A Methodology Concept for Territorial Metabolism - Life Cycle Assessment: Challenges and Opportunities in Scaling from Urban to Territorial Assessment
    Sohn, Joshua
    Vega, Giovanna Croxatto
    Birkved, Morten
    [J]. 25TH CIRP LIFE CYCLE ENGINEERING (LCE) CONFERENCE, 2018, 69 : 89 - 93
  • [120] Definition of sustainability impact categories based on stakeholder perspectives
    Souza, R. G.
    Rosenhead, J.
    Salhofer, S. P.
    Valle, R. A. B.
    Lins, M. P. E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2015, 105 : 41 - 51