Integrating Multi-Criteria Techniques in Life-Cycle Tools for the Circular Bioeconomy Transition of Agri-Food Waste Biomass: A Systematic Review

被引:15
作者
Romero-Perdomo, Felipe [1 ,2 ]
Gonzalez-Curbelo, Miguel Angel [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ EAN, Fac Ingn, Dept Ciencias Basicas, Bogota 110221, Colombia
[2] Corp Colombiana Invest Agr AGROSAVIA, Mosquera 250047, Colombia
关键词
circular economy; sustainable agriculture; multi-criteria decision making; TOPSIS; stakeholders; social LCA; life-cycle costing; bioenergy; biorefinery; SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT; DECISION-ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY; ASSESSMENT LCA; METHODOLOGY; MANAGEMENT; FRAMEWORK; IMPACTS; TOPSIS; PRIORITIZATION;
D O I
10.3390/su15065026
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Agri-food waste biomass (AWB) is consolidating as a relevant bioresource for supplying material products and energy in a circular bioeconomy. However, its recovery and sustainable processing present trade-offs that must be understood. The integration of multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) into life-cycle assessment (LCA) tools has emerged as a novel way to address this challenge. This paper aims to conduct a systematic literature review to critically synthesize how MCDA has been integrated into LCA in an assessment framework and how helpful it is in AWB's circular bioeconomy transition. The literature shows that the most studied AWBs are rice husk, sugarcane bagasse, and household food waste. These are processed through the technologies of composting, anaerobic digestion, and pyrolysis for applications such as biofuels, bioenergy, and soil amendment. Environmental LCA (E-LCA) is the most widely used LCA tool, while both the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and the technique for ordering preference by similarity to the ideal solution (TOPSIS) are the most applied techniques for MCDA. The current trend of integrating MCDA into LCA does not fully cover the LCA phases, favoring solely the impact assessment phase and indicating that the other phases are overlooked. The potential and involvement of the stakeholders are partially explored. Although there are holistic sustainability assessments, the social implications are rarely considered. The number of MCDA/LCA studies is expected to increase, assessments at the micro-, meso-, and macro-scales to become more articulated, and the impact of the results to become more aligned with government and company goals.
引用
收藏
页数:27
相关论文
共 151 条
  • [1] The LCA4CSA framework: Using life cycle assessment to strengthen environmental sustainability analysis of climate smart agriculture options at farm and crop system levels
    Acosta-Alba, Ivonne
    Chia, Eduardo
    Andrieu, Nadine
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2019, 171 : 155 - 170
  • [2] Insights into Circular Horticulture: Knowledge Diffusion, Resource Circulation, One Health Approach, and Greenhouse Technologies
    Alejandro Salinas-Velandia, Diego
    Romero-Perdomo, Felipe
    Numa-Vergel, Stephanie
    Villagran, Edwin
    Donado-Godoy, Pilar
    Ricardo Galindo-Pacheco, Julio
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (19)
  • [3] Triple Bottom-Line Evaluation of the Production of Animal Feed from Food Waste: A Life Cycle Assessment
    Alsaleh, Alla
    Aleisa, Esra
    [J]. WASTE AND BIOMASS VALORIZATION, 2023, 14 (04) : 1169 - 1195
  • [4] Multi-criteria classification, sorting, and clustering: a bibliometric review and research agenda
    Amor, Sarah Ben
    Belaid, Fateh
    Benkraiem, Ramzi
    Ramdani, Boumediene
    Guesmi, Khaled
    [J]. ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2023, 325 (02) : 771 - 793
  • [5] Limits to circular bioeconomy in the transition towards decentralized biowaste management systems
    Angouria-Tsorochidou, Elisavet
    Teigiserova, Dominika Alexa
    Thomsen, Marianne
    [J]. RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2021, 164
  • [6] Production of solid biofuels from organic waste in developing countries: A review from sustainability and economic feasibility perspectives
    Angulo-Mosquera, Lina S.
    Alvarado-Alvarado, Allan A.
    Rivas-Arrieta, Maria J.
    Cattaneo, Carlos R.
    Rene, Eldon R.
    Garcia-Depraect, Octavio
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 795
  • [7] A method for human health impact assessment in social LCA: lessons from three case studies
    Arvidsson, Rickard
    Hildenbrand, Jutta
    Baumann, Henrikke
    Islam, K. M. Nazmul
    Parsmo, Rasmus
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2018, 23 (03) : 690 - 699
  • [8] Life cycle assessment and feasibility analysis of a combined chemical looping combustion and power-to-methane system for CO2 capture and utilization
    Bareschino, P.
    Mancusi, E.
    Urciuolo, M.
    Paulillo, A.
    Chirone, R.
    Pepe, F.
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2020, 130
  • [9] An integrated multi-criteria analysis for assessing sustainability of agricultural production at regional level
    Bartzas G.
    Komnitsas K.
    [J]. Information Processing in Agriculture, 2020, 7 (02): : 223 - 232
  • [10] PROMETHEE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications
    Behzadian, Majid
    Kazemadeh, R. B.
    Albadvi, A.
    Aghdasi, M.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2010, 200 (01) : 198 - 215