Are Populists Politically Intolerant? Citizens' Populist Attitudes and Tolerance of Various Political Antagonists

被引:8
作者
Bos, Linda [1 ]
Wichgers, Lisanne [2 ]
van Spanje, Joost [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Sch Commun Res, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Lisanne Wichgers Consulting, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Univ London, Dept Polit & Int Relat Royal Holloway, London, England
关键词
populism; political intolerance; CONSEQUENCES; IDENTITIES; PREJUDICE; DEMOCRACY; CONFLICT; PEOPLE; TRUST;
D O I
10.1177/00323217211049299
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Political tolerance-the willingness to extend civil rights to political antagonists-is a key democratic norm. We argue that because voters with populist attitudes have an ambiguous relationship with democracy and keep a narrow definition of the people, they are more likely to be politically intolerant. We study the Netherlands, a less likely case to find political intolerance. Using data from a representative household panel survey (n = 1999), we investigate the extent to which populist attitudes translate into general intolerant attitudes and specific intolerance toward political antagonists. Our analyses show that voters with stronger populist attitudes are less supportive of democratic norms, more intolerant of opposing views online, and of specific political opponents. However, they are not explicitly intolerant by limiting individual civil rights or supporting intolerant measures toward political antagonists. These findings show that even in a system engrained with compromise, populist citizens show signs of political intolerance.
引用
收藏
页码:851 / 868
页数:18
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]   Populism versus democracy [J].
Abts, Koen ;
Rummens, Stefan .
POLITICAL STUDIES, 2007, 55 (02) :405-424
[2]   How Populist Are the People? Measuring Populist Attitudes in Voters [J].
Akkerman, Agnes ;
Mudde, Cas ;
Zaslove, Andrej .
COMPARATIVE POLITICAL STUDIES, 2014, 47 (09) :1324-1353
[3]   The roots of intolerance and opposition to compromise: The effects of absolutism on political attitudes [J].
Arceneaux, Kevin .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2019, 151
[4]   The Conditional Effect of Network Diversity and Values on Tolerance [J].
Bloom, Pazit Ben-Nun ;
Bagno-Moldavsky, Olena .
POLITICAL BEHAVIOR, 2015, 37 (03) :623-651
[5]   The effects of populism as a social identity frame on persuasion and mobilisation: Evidence from a 15-country experiment [J].
Bos, Linda ;
Schemer, Christian ;
Corbu, Nicoleta ;
Hameleers, Michael ;
Andreadis, Ioannis ;
Schulz, Anne ;
Schmuck, Desiree ;
Reinemann, Carsten ;
Fawzi, Nayla .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL RESEARCH, 2020, 59 (01) :3-24
[6]   The Ideological-Conflict Hypothesis: Intolerance Among Both Liberals and Conservatives [J].
Brandt, Mark J. ;
Reyna, Christine ;
Chambers, John R. ;
Crawford, Jarret T. ;
Wetherell, Geoffrey .
CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2014, 23 (01) :27-34
[7]   Trust the people! Populism and the two faces of democracy [J].
Canovan, M .
POLITICAL STUDIES, 1999, 47 (01) :2-16
[8]   Militant Democracy: The Institutional Bases of Democratic Self-Preservation [J].
Capoccia, Giovanni .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF LAW AND SOCIAL SCIENCE, VOL 9, 2013, 9 :207-226
[9]   Does Intolerance Dampen Dissent? Macro-Tolerance and Protest in American Metropolitan Areas [J].
Claassen, Christopher ;
Gibson, James L. .
POLITICAL BEHAVIOR, 2019, 41 (01) :165-185
[10]  
CRANDALL CS, 2002, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V82, P359, DOI [DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.82.3.359, 10.1037/0022-3514.82.3.359]