Energy, economic, and environmental (3E) assessment of the major greenhouse crops: MFCA-LCA approach

被引:2
|
作者
Dekamin, Majid [1 ]
Sadeghimofrad, Toktamsadat [2 ]
Ahmadloo, Amir [1 ]
机构
[1] Malayer Univ, Fac Agr, Dept Plant Prod & Genet, Malayer, Hamadan, Iran
[2] Ferdowsi Univ Mashhad, Dept Biosyst Engn, Mashhad, Iran
关键词
Global warming potential; Circular economy; Energy productivity; Sustainability assessment; Intensive farming; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; COST ACCOUNTING MFCA; IMPACT ASSESSMENT; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-024-32576-8
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In order to develop sustainable production of greenhouse crops, the economic, energy, and environmental aspects of production should be considered. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the economic, energy, and environmental (3E) sustainability of cucumber, tomato, and bell pepper production in greenhouses by performing material flow cost accounting (MFCA) and life cycle assessment (LCA) material and methods. Calculating the economic and energy value of losses in agricultural sustainability assessment studies is not common. Using the LCA method alone does not allow us to calculate the monetary and energy value of waste. If this method is used simultaneously with MFCA, this gap will be filled. The system boundary for LCA was from cradle to farm, and for MFCA, foreground processes were considered. The production of each crop was compared at the level of 1000 m2 during 1 year. Data were collected through questionnaire-based interviews. The gross value of production for cucumber, tomato, and bell pepper were 8982, 16387, and 17610 $/1000 m2, respectively. The negative production of cucumber, tomato, and bell pepper were 702, 718, and 449 $/1000 m2, respectively. The benefit-to-cost ratio in the production of cucumber, tomato, and bell pepper was calculated as 2.8, 5.17, and 5.8, respectively. The economic productivity in the production of cucumber, tomato, and bell pepper was calculated at 10.25, 7, and 4.4 kg/$. Labor cost was the main cost in the production of all three crops. The total input energy for the production of cucumber, tomato, and bell pepper was estimated to be 99.4, 123.1, and 164.6 GJ/1000 m2, respectively. Negative products in the production of cucumber, tomato, and bell pepper were obtained at - 24.2, - 23.9, and - 13.5 GJ/1000 m2, respectively. The energy productivity of cucumber, tomato, and bell pepper was calculated as 0.23, 0.26, and 0.08 kg/MJ, respectively. The specific energy indices were 4.32, 3.79, and 12.20 MJ/kg for cucumber, tomato, and bell pepper, respectively. The energy ratio in the production of tomato (0.02) was higher than bell pepper (- 0.02) and cucumber (- 0.06). From the perspective of energy, electricity was recognized as the hotspot for the production of three crops. Global warming (GWP100a), ozone layer depletion (ODP), acidification (AC), and eutrophication (EP) indices were calculated for all three crops. Tomato production was ranked first in all impact categories. On-farm emissions and electricity consumption were identified as environmental hotspots. The subsidized price of electricity, natural gas, and chemical fertilizers has led to their excessive use in the production of greenhouse plants. It can be concluded that bell pepper has the best performance from an economic point of view. However, its production is not justified in terms of energy. Tomato was ranked first in terms of energy, and cucumber was ranked first in terms of low environmental impacts. The production of these plants with energy and chemical fertilizer subsidies is currently cost-effective. If the prices are corrected, the production of these plants will face serious challenges. Producing electricity from sunlight and mechanizing production processes can be a solution to these challenges.
引用
收藏
页码:21894 / 21912
页数:19
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [21] Energy-environment-economic (3E) hub for sustainable plastic management - Upgraded recycling, chemical valorization, and bioplastics
    Patria, Raffel Dharma
    Rehman, Shazia
    Yuen, Chun-Bong
    Lee, Duu-Jong
    Vuppaladadiyam, Arun K.
    Leu, Shao-Yuan
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2024, 357
  • [22] Comparative evaluation of valorisation alternatives for waste oyster shells in construction using Engineering-Environmental-Economic(3E) model
    Zhu, Hao-Yu
    Guo, Ming-Zhi
    Zhang, Yan
    CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, 2025, 465
  • [23] Comprehensive Performance Evaluation of Green Infrastructure Practices for Urban Watersheds Using an Engineering-Environmental-Economic (3E) Model
    Xing, Yi-Jia
    Chen, Tse-Lun
    Gao, Meng-Yao
    Pei, Si-Lu
    Pan, Wei-Bin
    Chiang, Pen-Chi
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (09)
  • [24] Economic and environmental feasibility of coupled wind power-subsurface compressed CO 2 energy storage system in China: An LCA approach
    Deng, Chenyang
    Zhang, Liwei
    Gan, Manguang
    Wang, Yan
    Li, Xiaochun
    GAS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2024, 128
  • [25] Dynamic energy LCA-based assessment approach to evaluate energy intensity and related impact for the biogas CHP plant as the basis of the environmental view of sustainability
    Kluczek, Aldona
    15TH GLOBAL CONFERENCE ON SUSTAINABLE MANUFACTURING, 2018, 21 : 297 - 304
  • [26] Assessing Environmental and Economic Sustainability of Fresh Unpacked, Fresh Packed, and Frozen Carrots in Austria: A Case Study with a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) Approach
    Birkenmaier, Franziska
    Schuchter, Lucas
    Pillei, Martin
    Bach, Katrin
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (17)
  • [27] Energetic, economic and environmental (3E) analyses and LCOE estimation of three technologies of PV grid-connected systems under different climates
    Allouhi, A.
    Saadani, R.
    Buker, M. S.
    Kousksou, T.
    Jamil, A.
    Rahmoune, M.
    SOLAR ENERGY, 2019, 178 : 25 - 36
  • [28] A cascade lithium bromide absorption refrigeration/dehumidification system for efficient energy recovery: Development, 3E optimization and life cycle assessment
    Xu, Aixiang
    Yang, Lanxiang
    Song, Tingting
    Xu, Mengjin
    Chen, Hong
    Xiang, Li
    Liu, Zhiqiang
    Yang, Sheng
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2023, 383
  • [29] Performance assessment of hybrid desiccant air conditioning systems: A dynamic approach towards achieving optimum 3E solution across the lifespan
    Saedpanah, Ehsan
    Pasdarshahri, Hadi
    ENERGY, 2021, 234
  • [30] From the new European Standards to an environmental, energy and economic assessment of building assemblies from cradle-to-cradle (3E-C2C)
    Silvestre, Jose Dinis
    de Brito, Jorge
    Pinheiro, Manuel Duarte
    ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2013, 64 : 199 - 208