Energy, economic, and environmental (3E) assessment of the major greenhouse crops: MFCA-LCA approach

被引:2
|
作者
Dekamin, Majid [1 ]
Sadeghimofrad, Toktamsadat [2 ]
Ahmadloo, Amir [1 ]
机构
[1] Malayer Univ, Fac Agr, Dept Plant Prod & Genet, Malayer, Hamadan, Iran
[2] Ferdowsi Univ Mashhad, Dept Biosyst Engn, Mashhad, Iran
关键词
Global warming potential; Circular economy; Energy productivity; Sustainability assessment; Intensive farming; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; COST ACCOUNTING MFCA; IMPACT ASSESSMENT; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-024-32576-8
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In order to develop sustainable production of greenhouse crops, the economic, energy, and environmental aspects of production should be considered. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the economic, energy, and environmental (3E) sustainability of cucumber, tomato, and bell pepper production in greenhouses by performing material flow cost accounting (MFCA) and life cycle assessment (LCA) material and methods. Calculating the economic and energy value of losses in agricultural sustainability assessment studies is not common. Using the LCA method alone does not allow us to calculate the monetary and energy value of waste. If this method is used simultaneously with MFCA, this gap will be filled. The system boundary for LCA was from cradle to farm, and for MFCA, foreground processes were considered. The production of each crop was compared at the level of 1000 m2 during 1 year. Data were collected through questionnaire-based interviews. The gross value of production for cucumber, tomato, and bell pepper were 8982, 16387, and 17610 $/1000 m2, respectively. The negative production of cucumber, tomato, and bell pepper were 702, 718, and 449 $/1000 m2, respectively. The benefit-to-cost ratio in the production of cucumber, tomato, and bell pepper was calculated as 2.8, 5.17, and 5.8, respectively. The economic productivity in the production of cucumber, tomato, and bell pepper was calculated at 10.25, 7, and 4.4 kg/$. Labor cost was the main cost in the production of all three crops. The total input energy for the production of cucumber, tomato, and bell pepper was estimated to be 99.4, 123.1, and 164.6 GJ/1000 m2, respectively. Negative products in the production of cucumber, tomato, and bell pepper were obtained at - 24.2, - 23.9, and - 13.5 GJ/1000 m2, respectively. The energy productivity of cucumber, tomato, and bell pepper was calculated as 0.23, 0.26, and 0.08 kg/MJ, respectively. The specific energy indices were 4.32, 3.79, and 12.20 MJ/kg for cucumber, tomato, and bell pepper, respectively. The energy ratio in the production of tomato (0.02) was higher than bell pepper (- 0.02) and cucumber (- 0.06). From the perspective of energy, electricity was recognized as the hotspot for the production of three crops. Global warming (GWP100a), ozone layer depletion (ODP), acidification (AC), and eutrophication (EP) indices were calculated for all three crops. Tomato production was ranked first in all impact categories. On-farm emissions and electricity consumption were identified as environmental hotspots. The subsidized price of electricity, natural gas, and chemical fertilizers has led to their excessive use in the production of greenhouse plants. It can be concluded that bell pepper has the best performance from an economic point of view. However, its production is not justified in terms of energy. Tomato was ranked first in terms of energy, and cucumber was ranked first in terms of low environmental impacts. The production of these plants with energy and chemical fertilizer subsidies is currently cost-effective. If the prices are corrected, the production of these plants will face serious challenges. Producing electricity from sunlight and mechanizing production processes can be a solution to these challenges.
引用
收藏
页码:21894 / 21912
页数:19
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] Energy, economic, and environmental (3E) assessment of the major greenhouse crops: MFCA-LCA approach
    Majid Dekamin
    Toktamsadat Sadeghimofrad
    Amir Ahmadloo
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2024, 31 : 21894 - 21912
  • [2] Comparative assessment and multi-objective optimization for the gray and blue ammonia synthesis processes: Energy, Economic and Environmental (3E) analysis
    Shin, Beom-Ju
    Mun, Ji-Hun
    Devkota, Sijan
    Kim, Seung-Mo
    Kang, Tae-Ha
    Mazari, Shaukat Ali
    Cho, Kanghee
    Kim, Sun Hyung
    Chun, Dong-Hyuk
    Kim, Kyung-Min
    Yoon, Hyung Chul
    Moon, Jong-Ho
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2023, 48 (90) : 35123 - 35138
  • [3] Emergy, Environmental and Economic (3E) Assessment of Biomass Pellets from Agricultural Waste
    Deng, Yun
    Ran, Xueling
    Elshareef, Hussien
    Dong, Renjie
    Zhou, Yuguang
    AGRICULTURE-BASEL, 2025, 15 (06):
  • [4] Optimizing the insulation thickness of external wall by a novel 3E (energy, environmental, economic) method
    Rad, Ehsan Amiri
    Fallahi, Elmira
    CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, 2019, 205 : 196 - 212
  • [5] Energy Retrofitting of a Buildings' Envelope: Assessment of the Environmental, Economic and Energy (3E) Performance of a Cork-Based Thermal Insulating Rendering Mortar
    Silvestre, Jose D.
    Castelo, Andre M. P.
    Silva, Jose J. B. C.
    de Brito, Jorge M. C. L.
    Pinheiro, Manuel D.
    ENERGIES, 2020, 13 (01)
  • [6] 3E (energy, environmental, and economy) evaluation and assessment to an innovative dual-gas polygeneration system
    Yi, Qun
    Feng, Jie
    Wu, Yanli
    Li, Wenying
    ENERGY, 2014, 66 : 285 - 294
  • [7] Assessment of the environmental impact and economic performance of cacao agroforestry systems in the Ecuadorian Amazon region: An LCA approach
    Caicedo, Carlos
    Perez-Neira, David
    Abad-Gonzalez, Julio
    Gallar, David
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 849
  • [8] Energy/exergy, economic, and environment (3E) analysis of the hydrogen energy production process
    Nugroho, Rusdan Aditya Aji
    Hsu, Hsin-Wei
    Wang, Wei-Cheng
    Utomo, Valencia Lilian
    Saputro, Herman
    Sittijunda, Sureewan
    Kuo, Jenn-Kun
    Surjasatyo, Adi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2025, 103 : 467 - 479
  • [9] Energy and environmental evaluation of greenhouse bell pepper production with life cycle assessment approach
    Naderi, Sayed Ahmad
    Dehkordi, Amin Lotfalian
    Taki, Morteza
    ENVIRONMENTAL AND SUSTAINABILITY INDICATORS, 2019, 3-4
  • [10] Environmental and economic assessment of hard apple cider using an integrated LCA-LCC approach
    Smith, Meghann
    Lal, Pankaj
    SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, 2022, 32 : 282 - 295