Assessment of the clinical and analytical performance of three Seegene Allplex SARS-CoV-2 assays within the VALCOR framework

被引:1
作者
Chung, Pui Yan Jenny [1 ]
Dhillon, Sharonjit K. [1 ]
Simoens, Cindy [1 ]
Cuypers, Lize [2 ,3 ]
Laenen, Lies [2 ,3 ]
Bonde, Jesper [4 ]
Corbisier, Philippe [5 ]
Buttinger, Gerhard [5 ]
Cocuzza, Clementina E. [6 ]
Van Gucht, Steven [7 ]
Van Ranst, Marc [8 ]
Arbyn, Marc [1 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Sciensano, Belgian Canc Ctr, Unit Canc Epidemiol, Brussels, Belgium
[2] Univ Hosp Leuven, Natl Reference Ctr Resp Pathogens, Dept Lab Med, Leuven, Belgium
[3] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Microbiol Immunol & Transplantat, Lab Clin Microbiol, Leuven, Belgium
[4] Copenhagen Univ Hosp, AHH Hvidovre Hosp, Dept Pathol, Mol Pathol Lab, Copenhagen, Denmark
[5] European Commiss, Joint Res Ctr JRC, Geel, Belgium
[6] Univ Milano Bicocca, Dept Med & Surg, Lab Clin Microbiol & Virol, Monza, Italy
[7] Sciensano, Serv Viral Dis, Brussels, Belgium
[8] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Rega Inst Med Res, Dept Microbiol Immunol & Transplantat, Lab Clin & Epidemiol Virol, Leuven, Belgium
[9] Univ Ghent, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Dept Human Struct & Repair, Ghent, Belgium
关键词
SARS-CoV-2; diagnostics test accuracy; RT-PCR; COVID-19; test validation; quality control; Seegene; Allplex; VALCOR; standard; reference material;
D O I
10.1128/spectrum.02397-23
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic demonstrated the need for accurate diagnostic testing for the early detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Although the pandemic has ended, accurate assays are still needed to monitor viral spread at national levels and beyond through population and wastewater surveillance. To enhance early detection, SARS-CoV-2 assays should have high diagnostic accuracy and should be validated to assure accurate results. Three distinct SARS-CoV-2 assays were evaluated with clinical samples using the VALCOR (VALidation of SARS-CORona Virus-2 assays) framework, with the TaqPath COVID-19 assay (ThermoFisher Scientific, USA) as a comparator. We evaluated clinical sensitivity, specificity, limit of detection (LOD), and overall concordance between comparator and three index Allplex SARS-CoV-2 assays (Seegene, South Korea): Allplex-SC2, Allplex-SC2Fast (Fast PCR), and Allplex-SC2FabR (SARS-CoV-2/FluA/FluB/respiratory syncytial virus). Analytical performance and LOD of index assays were assessed using a dilution series of three synthetic SARS-CoV-2 sequence reference materials (RMs). Ninety SARS-CoV-2 positives and 90 SARS-CoV-2 negatives were tested. All Allplex assays had 100.0% sensitivity (95%CI = 95.9%-100.0%). Allplex-SC2 and Allplex-SC2Fast assays had 97.8% specificity (95%CI = 92.3%-99.7%) and 98.9% overall concordance [kappa = 0.978 (95%CI = 0.947-1.000)]. Allplex-SC2FabR assay showed 100.0% specificity (95%CI = 95.9%-100.0%) and 100.0% overall concordance [kappa = 1.000 (95%CI = 1.000-1.000)]. LOD assessment of index assays revealed detection down to 2.61 x 102 copies/mL in clinical samples, while the analytical LOD was 9.00 x 102 copies/mL. In conclusion, the evaluation of the three Seegene Allplex SARS-CoV-2 assays showed high sensitivity and specificity and an overall good assay concordance with the comparator. The assays showed low analytical LOD using RM and even a slightly lower LOD in clinical samples. Non-overlapping target gene sequences between SARS-CoV-2 assays and RMs emphasize the need for aligning targeted sequences of diagnostic assays and RMs.IMPORTANCEThe coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has a significant impact on global public health, economies, and societies. As shown through the first phases of the pandemic, accurate and timely diagnosis is crucial for disease control, prevention, and monitoring. Though the pandemic phase of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has concluded, diagnostic assays remain in demand to monitor SARS-CoV-2 at the individual patient level, regionally, and nationally, as well as to remain an infectious disease preparedness instrument to monitor any new SARS-CoV-2 dissemination across borders using population and wastewater surveillance. The anticipation by WHO and central health care policy entities such as the Center for Disease Control, EMA, and multiple national health authorities is that SARS-CoV-2 will reside as an endemic respiratory disease for years to come. The key strategic consideration is hence shifting from combating a pandemic situation with a high number of patients to instead allowing precise diagnostics of suspected patients with the intention of correct management in a low-prevalence setting. The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has a significant impact on global public health, economies, and societies. As shown through the first phases of the pandemic, accurate and timely diagnosis is crucial for disease control, prevention, and monitoring. Though the pandemic phase of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has concluded, diagnostic assays remain in demand to monitor SARS-CoV-2 at the individual patient level, regionally, and nationally, as well as to remain an infectious disease preparedness instrument to monitor any new SARS-CoV-2 dissemination across borders using population and wastewater surveillance. The anticipation by WHO and central health care policy entities such as the Center for Disease Control, EMA, and multiple national health authorities is that SARS-CoV-2 will reside as an endemic respiratory disease for years to come. The key strategic consideration is hence shifting from combating a pandemic situation with a high number of patients to instead allowing precise diagnostics of suspected patients with the intention of correct management in a low-prevalence setting.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Efficient SARS-CoV-2 detection in unextracted oro-nasopharyngeal specimens by rRT-PCR with the Seegene Allplex™ 2019-nCoV assay [J].
Wesley Freppel ;
Natacha Merindol ;
Fabien Rallu ;
Marco Bergevin .
Virology Journal, 17
[22]   Performance assessment of seven SARS-CoV-2 IgG enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays [J].
Deshpande, Ketki ;
Pt, Ullas ;
Kaduskar, Ojas ;
Vijay, Neetu ;
Rakhe, Aparna ;
Vidhate, Shankar ;
Khutwad, Kirtee ;
Deshpande, Gururaj Rao ;
Tilekar, Bipin ;
Saka, Sanskruti ;
Gadekar, Kshitija ;
Patil, Roshni ;
Yadav, Pragya ;
Potdar, Varsha ;
Gurav, Yogesh ;
Gupta, Priyanka ;
Kaur, Harmanmeet ;
Narayan, Jitendra ;
Sapkal, Gajanan ;
Abraham, Priya .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL VIROLOGY, 2021, 93 (12) :6696-6702
[23]   Analytical and Clinical Performance of Droplet Digital PCR in the Detection and Quantification of SARS-CoV-2 [J].
Kim, Kyoung Bo ;
Choi, Hayoung ;
Lee, Gun Dong ;
Lee, Jaewoong ;
Lee, Seungok ;
Kim, Yonggoo ;
Cho, Sung-Yeon ;
Lee, Dong-Gun ;
Kim, Myungshin .
MOLECULAR DIAGNOSIS & THERAPY, 2021, 25 (05) :617-628
[24]   Validation and verification of the Abbott RealTime SARS-CoV-2 assay analytical and clinical performance [J].
Degli-Angeli, Emily ;
Dragavon, Joan ;
Huang, Meei-Li ;
Lucic, Danijela ;
Cloherty, Gavin ;
Jerome, Keith R. ;
Greninger, Alexander L. ;
Coombs, Robert W. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL VIROLOGY, 2020, 129
[25]   Analytical sensitivity and clinical sensitivity of the three rapid antigen detection kits for detection of SARS-CoV-2 virus [J].
Mak, Gannon C. K. ;
Lau, Stephen S. Y. ;
Wong, Kitty K. Y. ;
Chow, Nancy L. S. ;
Lau, C. S. ;
Lam, Edman T. K. ;
Chan, Rickjason C. W. ;
Tsang, Dominic N. C. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL VIROLOGY, 2020, 133
[26]   Clinical validation of quantitative SARS-CoV-2 antigen assays to estimate SARS-CoV-2 viral loads in nasopharyngeal swabs [J].
Aoki, Kotaro ;
Nagasawa, Tatsuya ;
Ishii, Yoshikazu ;
Yagi, Shintaro ;
Okuma, Sadatsugu ;
Kashiwagi, Katsuhito ;
Maeda, Tadashi ;
Miyazaki, Taito ;
Yoshizawa, Sadako ;
Tateda, Kazuhiro .
JOURNAL OF INFECTION AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2021, 27 (04) :613-616
[27]   Comparison of the clinical sensitivity and specificity of two commercial RNA SARS-CoV-2 assays [J].
Litchfield, Mark ;
Brookes, Paul ;
Ojrzynska, Agnieszka ;
Kavi, Janki ;
Dawood, Richard .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2022, 118 :194-196
[28]   A Comparison of Five SARS-CoV-2 Molecular Assays With Clinical Correlations [J].
Procop, Gary W. ;
Brock, Jay E. ;
Reineks, Edmunds Z. ;
Shrestha, Nabin K. ;
Demkowicz, Ryan ;
Cook, Eleanor ;
Ababneh, Emad ;
Harrington, Susan M. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2021, 155 (01) :69-78
[29]   Analytical and Clinical Comparison of Three Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests for SARS-CoV-2 Detection [J].
Smith, Elizabeth ;
Zhen, Wei ;
Manji, Ryhana ;
Schron, Deborah ;
Duong, Scott ;
Berry, Gregory J. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2020, 58 (09)
[30]   Clinical Performance of SARS-CoV-2 Molecular Tests [J].
Green, Daniel A. ;
Zucker, Jason ;
Westblade, Lars F. ;
Whittier, Susan ;
Rennert, Hanna ;
Velu, Priya ;
Craney, Arryn ;
Cushing, Melissa ;
Liu, Dakai ;
Sobieszczyk, Magdalena E. ;
Boehme, Amelia K. ;
Sepulveda, Jorge L. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2020, 58 (08)