The Community Stress-Drop Validation Study-Part II: Uncertainties of the Source Parameters and Stress Drop Analysis

被引:26
作者
Bindi, Dino [1 ]
Spallarossa, Daniele [2 ]
Picozzi, Matteo [3 ]
Oth, Adrien [4 ]
Morasca, Paola [5 ]
Mayeda, Kevin [6 ]
机构
[1] German Res Ctr Geosci GFZ, Potsdam, Germany
[2] Univ Genoa, Dept Earth Environm & Life Sci DISTAV, Genoa, Italy
[3] Univ Naples Federico II, Dept Phys, Naples, Italy
[4] European Ctr Geodynam & Seismol, Walferdange, Luxembourg
[5] Natl Inst Geophys & Volcanol INGV, Milan, Italy
[6] Air Force Tech Applicat Ctr AFTAC, Patrick Afb, FL USA
关键词
VARIABILITY; CALIFORNIA; RIDGECREST; MODELS;
D O I
10.1785/0220230020
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
As part of the community stress-drop validation study, we evaluate the uncertainties of seismic moment M0 and corner frequency f, for earthquakes of the 2019 Ridgecrest sequence. Source spectra were obtained in the companion article by applying the spec-tral decomposition approach with alternative processing and model assumptions. The objective of the present study is twofold: first, to quantify the impact of different assumptions on the source parameters; and second, to use the distribution of values obtained with different assumptions to estimate an epistemic contribution to the uncer-tainties. Regarding the first objective, we find that the choice of the attenuation model has a strong impact on f, results: by introducing a depth-dependent attenuation model, f, estimates of events shallower than 6 km increase of about 10%. Also, the duration of the window used to compute the Fourier spectra show an impact on f,: the average ratio between the estimates for 20 s duration to those for 5 s decreases from 1.1 for Mw < 3 to 0.66 for Mw > 4.5. For the second objective, we use a mixed-effect regres-sion to partition the intraevent variability into duration, propagation, and site contri-butions. The standard deviation & phi; of the intraevent residuals for log (f,) is 0.0635, corresponding to a corner frequency ratio 102 & phi; = 1.33. When the intraevent variability is compared to uncertainties on log (f,), we observe that 2 & phi; is generally larger than the 95% confidence interval of log (f,), suggesting that the uncertainty of the source parameters provided by the fitting procedure might underestimate the model-related (epistemic) uncertainty. Finally, although we observe an increase of log (& UDelta;& sigma;) with log (M0) regardless of the model assumptions, the increase of & UDelta;& sigma; with depth depends on the assumptions, and no significant trends are detected when depth-dependent attenuation and velocity values are considered.
引用
收藏
页码:1992 / 2002
页数:11
相关论文
共 34 条
[31]   Crossed and Nested Mixed-Effects Approaches for Enhanced Model Development and Removal of the Ergodic Assumption in Empirical Ground-Motion Models [J].
Stafford, Peter J. .
BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2014, 104 (02) :702-719
[32]  
Venables W.N., 2002, MODERN APPL STAT S, VFourth, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-21706-2
[33]   Detailed traveltime tomography and seismic catalogue around the 2019 Mw7.1 Ridgecrest, California, earthquake using dense rapid-response seismic data [J].
White, Malcolm C. A. ;
Fang, Hongjian ;
Catchings, Rufus D. ;
Goldman, Mark R. ;
Steidl, Jamison H. ;
Ben-Zion, Yehuda .
GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 227 (01) :204-227
[34]  
Wickham H., 2016, ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-24277-4, 10.1007/978-3-319-24277-4]