Impella Versus VA-ECMO for Patients with Cardiogenic Shock: Comprehensive Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analyses

被引:8
作者
Ardito, Vittoria [1 ]
Sarucanian, Lilit [1 ]
Rognoni, Carla [1 ]
Pieri, Marina [2 ]
Scandroglio, Anna Mara [2 ]
Tarricone, Rosanna [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] SDA Bocconi Sch Management, Ctr Res Hlth & Social Care Management CERGAS, I-20136 Milan, Italy
[2] IRCCS San Raffaele Sci Inst, Dept Anesthesia & Intens Care, I-20132 Milan, Italy
[3] Bocconi Univ, Dept Social & Polit Sci, I-20136 Milan, Italy
关键词
Impella; VA-ECMO; cardiogenic shock; literature review; meta-analyses; EXTRACORPOREAL MEMBRANE-OXYGENATION; MECHANICAL CIRCULATORY SUPPORT; ACUTE MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; VENTRICULAR ASSIST DEVICE; INTRAAORTIC BALLOON PUMP; LIFE-SUPPORT; CLINICAL-OUTCOMES; HOSPITAL OUTCOMES; MEDICAL DEVICES; PREDICTORS;
D O I
10.3390/jcdd10040158
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Impella and VA-ECMO are two possible therapeutic courses for the treatment of patients with cardiogenic shock (CS). The study aims to perform a systematic literature review and meta-analyses of a comprehensive set of clinical and socio-economic outcomes observed when using Impella or VA-ECMO with patients under CS. A systematic literature review was performed in Medline, and Web of Science databases on 21 February 2022. Nonoverlapping studies with adult patients supported for CS with Impella or VA-ECMO were searched. Study designs including RCTs, observational studies, and economic evaluations were considered. Data on patient characteristics, type of support, and outcomes were extracted. Additionally, meta-analyses were performed on the most relevant and recurring outcomes, and results shown using forest plots. A total of 102 studies were included, 57% on Impella, 43% on VA-ECMO. The most common outcomes investigated were mortality/survival, duration of support, and bleeding. Ischemic stroke was lower in patients treated with Impella compared to the VA-ECMO population, with statistically significant difference. Socio-economic outcomes including quality of life or resource use were not reported in any study. The study highlighted areas where further data collection is needed to clarify the value of complex, new technologies in the treatment of CS that will enable comparative assessments focusing both on the health impact on patient outcomes and on the financial burden for government budgets. Future studies need to fill the gap to comply with recent regulatory updates at the European and national levels.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 140 条
[1]  
Abouelwafa Mohamed, 2019, Open Access Maced J Med Sci, V7, P1768, DOI 10.3889/oamjms.2019.547
[2]   IMPELLA VERSUS EXTRACORPOREAL MEMBRANE OXYGENATION IN CARDIOGENIC SHOCK: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS [J].
Abusnina, Waiel ;
Ismayl, Mahmoud ;
Al-abdouh, Ahmad ;
Ganesan, Vaishnavi ;
Mostafa, Mostafa Reda ;
Hallak, Osama ;
Peterson, Emily ;
Abdou, Mahmoud ;
Goldsweig, Andrew M. ;
Aboeata, Ahmed ;
Dahal, Khagendra .
SHOCK, 2022, 58 (05) :349-357
[3]  
Affas Z.R, CUREUS J MED SCIENCE
[4]   Impella Versus Extracorporeal Membranous Oxygenation (ECMO) for Cardiogenic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis [J].
Ahmad, Soban ;
Ahsan, Muhammad Junaid ;
Ikram, Sundus ;
Lateef, Noman ;
Khan, Behram A. ;
Tabassum, Shehroze ;
Naeem, Aroma ;
Qavi, Ahmed H. ;
Ardhanari, Sivakumar ;
Goldsweig, Andrew M. .
CURRENT PROBLEMS IN CARDIOLOGY, 2023, 48 (01)
[5]   Percutaneous left atrial decompression in adults with refractory cardiogenic shock supported with veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation [J].
Alhussein, Mosaad ;
Osten, Mark ;
Horlick, Eric ;
Ross, Heather ;
Fan, Eddy ;
Rao, Vivek ;
Billia, Filio .
JOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY, 2017, 32 (06) :396-401
[6]   Transfer of Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Using Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation [J].
Ali, Jason M. ;
Vuylsteke, Alain ;
Fowles, Jo-Anne ;
Pettit, Stephen ;
Salaunkey, Kiran ;
Bhagra, Sai ;
Lewis, Clive ;
Parameshwar, Jayan ;
Kydd, Anna ;
Patvardhan, Chinmay ;
Jones, Nicola ;
Rubino, Antonio ;
Abu-Omar, Yasir ;
Sudarshan, Catherine ;
Tsui, Steven ;
Catarino, Pedro ;
Jenkins, David P. ;
Berman, Marius .
JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2020, 34 (02) :374-382
[7]   Impella versus IABP in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock [J].
Alushi, Brunilda ;
Douedari, Andel ;
Froehlig, Georg ;
Knie, Wulf ;
Wurster, Thomas H. ;
Leistner, David M. ;
Staehli, Barbara-Elisabeth ;
Mochmann, Hans-Christian ;
Pieske, Burkert ;
Landmesser, Ulf ;
Krackhardt, Florian ;
Skurk, Carsten .
OPEN HEART, 2019, 6 (01)
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2022, REFWORKS
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2021, HARM HLTH TECHN ASS, DOI [10.1377/forefront.20211130.24462/full/, DOI 10.1377/FOREFRONT.20211130.24462/FULL]
[10]   Improved Outcomes Associated with the use of Shock Protocols: Updates from the National Cardiogenic Shock Initiative [J].
Basir, Mir B. ;
Kapur, Navin K. ;
Patel, Kirit ;
Salam, Murad A. ;
Schreiber, Theodore ;
Kaki, Amir ;
Hanson, Ivan ;
Almany, Steve ;
Timmis, Steve ;
Dixon, Simon ;
Kolski, Brian ;
Todd, Josh ;
Senter, Shaun ;
Marso, Steven ;
Lasorda, David ;
Wilkins, Charles ;
Lalonde, Thomas ;
Attallah, Antonious ;
Larkin, Timothy ;
Dupont, Allison ;
Marshall, Jeffrey ;
Patel, Nainesh ;
Overly, Tjuan ;
Green, Michael ;
Tehrani, Behnam ;
Truesdell, Alexander G. ;
Sharma, Rahul ;
Akhtar, Yasir ;
McRae, Thomas ;
O'Neill, Brian ;
Finley, John ;
Rahman, Ayaz ;
Foster, Malcolm ;
Askari, Raza ;
Goldsweig, Andrew ;
Martin, Scott ;
Bharadwaj, Aditya ;
Khuddus, Matheen ;
Caputo, Christopher ;
Korpas, Denes ;
Cawich, Ian ;
McAllister, David ;
Blank, Nimrod ;
Alraies, M. Chadi ;
Fisher, Ruth ;
Khandelwal, Akshay ;
Alaswad, Khaldoon ;
Lemor, Alejandro ;
Johnson, Tyrell ;
Hacala, Michael .
CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2019, 93 (07) :1173-1183