Global hidden spillover effects among concurrent green initiatives

被引:3
作者
An, Li [1 ]
Liu, Jianguo [2 ]
Zhang, Qi [3 ]
Song, Conghe [3 ]
Ezzine-de-Blas, Driss [4 ]
Dai, Jie [5 ]
Zhang, Huijie [6 ]
Lewison, Rebecca [7 ]
Bohnett, Eve [8 ]
Stow, Douglas [6 ]
Xu, Weihua [9 ]
Bryan, Brett A. [10 ]
机构
[1] Auburn Univ, Coll Forestry Wildlife & Environm, Auburn, AL 36849 USA
[2] Michigan State Univ, Ctr Syst Integrat & Sustainabil, Dept Fisheries & Wildlife, E Lansing, MI 48823 USA
[3] Univ North Carolina Chapel Hill, Dept Geog & Environm, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[4] MUSE, UPR Forets & Soc 4, Montpellier, France
[5] Arizona State Univ, Ctr Global Discovery & Conservat Sci, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
[6] San Diego State Univ, Dept Geog, 5500 Campanile Dr, San Diego, CA 92182 USA
[7] San Diego State Univ, Dept Biol, 5500 Campanile Dr, San Diego, CA 92182 USA
[8] Univ Florida, Dept Landscape Architecture, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[9] Chinese Acad Sci, Res Ctr Ecoenvironm Sci, State Key Lab Urban & Reg Ecol, Beijing 100085, Peoples R China
[10] Deakin Univ, Sch Life & Environm Sci, Melbourne Burwood Campus,221 Burwood Hwy, Burwood, Vic 3125, Australia
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Spillover effects; Concurrent green initiatives; Nature conservation; Sustainable development goals; Conservation effectiveness; Payments for environmental services; CONSERVATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.169880
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Concurrently implemented green initiatives to combat global environmental crises may be curtailed or even sacrificed given the ongoing global economic contraction. We collected empirical data and information about green initiatives from 15 sites or countries worldwide. We systematically explored how specific policy, intended behaviors, and gains of given green initiative may interact with those of other green initiatives concurrently implemented in the same geographic area or involving the same recipients. Surprisingly, we found that spillover effects were very divergent: one initiative could reduce the gain of another by 22 % similar to 100 %, representing alarming losses, while in other instances, substantial co -benefits could arise as one initiative can increase the gain of another by 9 % similar to 310 %. Leveraging these effects will help countries keep green initiatives with significant co benefits but stop initiatives with substantial spillover losses in the face of widespread budget cuts, better meeting the United Nations ' sustainable development goals.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [31] United Nations Development Programme, 2017, GUIDANCE NOTE: Application of the Sustainable Livelihoods Framework in Development Projects., P4
  • [32] USDA Farm Production and Conservation Business Center, 2020, County-Level CRP and EQIP Dataset in the USA
  • [33] Von der Leyen U, 2019, A Europe that strives for more: my agenda for Europe
  • [34] Conservation practices and gully erosion contributions in the Topashaw Canal watershed
    Wilson, G. V.
    Shields, F. D., Jr.
    Bingner, R. L.
    Reid-Rhoades, R.
    DiCarlo, D. A.
    Dabney, S. M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION, 2008, 63 (06) : 420 - 429
  • [35] Slippage effects of the conservation reserve program
    Wu, JJ
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2000, 82 (04) : 979 - 992
  • [36] From principles to practice in paying for nature's services
    Wunder, S.
    Brouwer, R.
    Engel, S.
    Ezzine-De-Blas, D.
    Muradian, R.
    Pascual, U.
    Pinto, R.
    [J]. NATURE SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 1 (03): : 145 - 150
  • [37] Yang W, 2016, PANDAS AND PEOPLE: COUPLING HUMAN AND NATURAL SYSTEMS FOR SUSTAINABILITY, P109
  • [38] Mechanisms behind concurrent payments for ecosystem services in a Chinese nature reserve
    Yost, Alexandra
    An, Li
    Bilsborrow, Richard
    Shi, Lei
    Chen, Xiaodong
    Yang, Shuang
    Zhang, Weiyong
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2020, 169