Consensus meetings will outperform integrative experiments

被引：0

作者：

Primbs, Maximilian A. ^{[1
]}

Dudda, Leonie A. ^{[2
,3
]}

Andresen, Pia K. ^{[4
]}

Buchanan, Erin M. ^{[5
]}

Peetz, Hannah K. ^{[1
]}

Silan, Miguel ^{[6
,7
]}

Lakens, Daniel ^{[8
]}

机构：

[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Behav Sci Inst, Nijmegen, Netherlands

[2] Univ Med Ctr, Dept Otorhinolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Utrecht, Netherlands

[3] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Univ Med Ctr, Utrecht Brain Ctr, Utrecht, Netherlands

[4] Univ Utrecht, Dept Methodol & Stat, Utrecht, Netherlands

[5] Harrisburg Univ Sci & Technol, Harrisburg, PA USA

[6] Annecy Behav Sci Lab, Menthon St Bernard, France

[7] Univ Lumiere Lyon 2, Dev Individu Proc Handicap Educ DIPHE, Bron, France

[8] Eindhoven Univ Technol, Human Technol Interact Grp, Eindhoven, Netherlands

来源：

BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES | 2024年 / 47卷

关键词：

D O I：

10.1017/S0140525X23002248

中图分类号：

B84 [心理学];

学科分类号：

04 ; 0402 ;

摘要：

We expect that consensus meetings, where researchers come together to discuss their theoretical viewpoints, prioritize the factors they agree are important to study, standardize their measures, and determine a smallest effect size of interest, will prove to be a more efficient solution to the lack of coordination and integration of claims in science than integrative experiments.

引用

页数：70

共 12 条

[1] A multi-lab test of the facial feedback hypothesis by the Many Smiles Collaboration
Coles, Nicholas Alvaro
March, David Scott
Marmolejo-Ramos, Fernando
Larsen, Jeff T.
Arinze, Nwadiogo Chisom
Ndukaihe, Izuchukwu Lawrence Gabriel
Willis, Megan
Foroni, Francesco
Reggev, Niv
Mokady, Aviv
Forscher, Patrick S.
Hunter, John F.
Kaminski, Gwenael
Yuvruk, Elif
Kapucu, Aycan
Nagy, Tamas
Hajdu, Nandor
Tejada, Julian
Freitag, Raquel Meister Ko
Zambrano, Danilo
Som, Bidisha
Aczel, Balazs
Barzykowski, Krystian
Adamus, Sylwia
Filip, Katarzyna
Yamada, Yuki
Ikeda, Ayumi
Eaves, Daniel
Levitan, Carmel
Leiweke, Sydney
Parzuchowski, Michal
Butcher, Natalie
Pfuhl, Gerit
Basnight-Brown, Dana
Hinojosa, Jose Antonio
Montoro, Pedro R.
Delgado, Grey Javela
Vezirian, Kevin
IJzerman, Hans
Trujillo, Natalia
Pressman, Sarah
Gygax, Pascal
Ozdogru, Asil Ali
Ruiz-Fernandez, Susana
Ellsworth, Phoebe C.
Gaertner, Lowell
Strack, Fritz
Marozzi, Marco
Liuzza, Marco Tullio
[J]. NATURE HUMAN BEHAVIOUR, 2022, 6 (12) : 1731 - 1742
[2] Danziger K., 1990, CONSTRUCTING SUBJECT, DOI [10.1017/CBO9780511524059, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511524059]
[3] CONSENSUS METHODS - CHARACTERISTICS AND GUIDELINES FOR USE
FINK, A
KOSECOFF, J
CHASSIN, M
BROOK, RH
[J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1984, 74 (09) : 979 - 983
[4] Review of Causal Discovery Methods Based on Graphical Models
Glymour, Clark
Zhang, Kun
Spirtes, Peter
[J]. FRONTIERS IN GENETICS, 2019, 10
[5] Description, prediction and causation: Methodological challenges of studying child and adolescent development
Hamaker, Ellen L.
Mulder, Jeroen D.
van IJzendoorn, Marinus H.
[J]. DEVELOPMENTAL COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2020, 46
[6] Crud (Re)Defined
Orben, Amy
Lakens, Daniel
[J]. ADVANCES IN METHODS AND PRACTICES IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2020, 3 (02) : 238 - 247
[7] Pearl J, 1995, BIOMETRIKA, V82, P669, DOI 10.2307/2337329
[8] The effect of face masks on the stereotype effect in emotion perception
Primbs, Maximilian A.
Rinck, Mike
Holland, Rob
Knol, Wieke
Nies, Anique
Bijlstra, Gijsbert
[J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 103
[9] Are Small Effects the Indispensable Foundation for a Cumulative Psychological Science? A Reply to Gotz et al. (2022)
Primbs, Maximilian A.
Pennington, Charlotte R.
Lakens, Daniel
Silan, Miguel Alejandro A.
Lieck, Dwayne S. N.
Forscher, Patrick S.
Buchanan, Erin M.
Westwood, Samuel J.
[J]. PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 18 (02) : 508 - 512
[10] To Explain or to Predict?
Shmueli, Galit
[J]. STATISTICAL SCIENCE, 2010, 25 (03) : 289 - 310

← 1 2 →