Effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation in chronic pain and neurogenic claudication related to lumbar spinal stenosis

被引:0
作者
Is, Enes Efe [1 ,2 ]
Aksu, Serkan [3 ,4 ]
Karamursel, Sacit [5 ]
Ketenci, Aysegul [6 ]
Sindel, Dilsad [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hlth Sci Turkiye, Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Teaching & Res Hosp, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Seyrantepe Campus,Cumhuriyet Ve Demokrasi Ave,Sari, TR-34485 Istanbul, Turkiye
[2] Istanbul Univ, Istanbul Fac Med, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Istanbul, Turkiye
[3] Mugla Sitki Kocman Univ, Dept Physiol, Fac Med, Mugla, Turkiye
[4] Istanbul Univ, Istanbul Fac Med, Dept Physiol, Istanbul, Turkiye
[5] Koc Univ, Sch Med, Dept Physiol, Istanbul, Turkiye
[6] Koc Univ, Sch Med, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Istanbul, Turkiye
关键词
Spinal stenosis; Brain stimulation; Chronic pain; Neurophysiology; Transcranial direct current stimulation; WALKING CAPACITY; MAGNETIC STIMULATION; NEUROPATHIC PAIN; BACK-PAIN; INDIVIDUALS; PERFORMANCE; GUIDELINES; SCALES; COHORT;
D O I
10.1007/s10072-023-07248-z
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
ObjectivesTranscranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a promising non-invasive brain stimulation technique for treating chronic pain, yet its effectiveness in chronic lower extremity pain due to lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) has not been studied. This research aimed to investigate the impact of tDCS on pain, walking capacity, functional status, and quality of life in LSS patients.Patients and methodsIn this prospective, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study, 32 LSS patients received either real or sham tDCS over the motor cortex contralateral to the patient's painful lower extremity for 10 consecutive weekdays (10 sessions). Evaluations were conducted at baseline, post-session, and 1-3 months later. The pain was evaluated by Visual Analog Scale (VAS), walking duration and distance by Treadmill Walking Test, functional status by Modified Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (MODQ) and quality of life by Short Form-36 (SF-36).ResultsIn-group comparisons, active tDCS showed sustained analgesic effects for 3-month post-treatment, distinct from sham. After the final session, active group exhibited significantly better asymptomatic walking distance and duration. Active stimulation led to notably lower MOLBDQ scores after 1 month. Significant improvements in SF-36 subscales were seen after 3 months, especially in pain, physical functioning, and general health. Positive tDCS effects on pain, claudication, and some quality of life aspects were evident at 3 months, while functional status improvements were mainly limited to 1 month.ConclusiontDCS shows potential as a safe, non-invasive technique for alleviating chronic LSS-related pain, enhancing mobility, functionality, and quality of life.Trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT03958526.
引用
收藏
页码:769 / 782
页数:14
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Objective Measurement Scales and Ambulatory Status
    Abou-Al-Shaar, Hussam
    Adogwa, Owoicho
    Mehta, Ankit I.
    [J]. ASIAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2018, 12 (04) : 765 - 774
  • [2] NEUROPATHIC PAIN AND DISABILITY IN PATIENTS WITH LUMBAR SPINAL STENOSIS
    Agirman, Mehmet
    Akgun, Ayse Serap
    [J]. TURKISH JOURNAL OF GERIATRICS-TURK GERIATRI DERGISI, 2018, 21 (01): : 56 - 61
  • [3] Nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis with neurogenic claudication
    Ammendolia, Carlo
    Stuber, Kent J.
    Rok, Elisabeth
    Rampersaud, Raja
    Kennedy, Carol A.
    Pennick, Victoria
    Steenstra, Ivan A.
    de Bruin, Linda K.
    Furlan, Andrea D.
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2013, (08):
  • [4] What interventions improve walking ability in neurogenic claudication with lumbar spinal stenosis? A systematic review
    Ammendolia, Carlo
    Stuber, Kent
    Tomkins-Lane, Christy
    Schneider, Michael
    Rampersaud, Y. Raja
    Furlan, Andrea D.
    Kennedy, Carol A.
    [J]. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2014, 23 (06) : 1282 - 1301
  • [5] Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct-current stimulation in neuropathic pain due to radiculopathy: a randomized sham-controlled comparative study
    Attal, Nadine
    Ayache, Samar S.
    De Andrade, Daniel Ciampi
    Mhalla, Alaa
    Baudic, Sophie
    Jazat, Frederique
    Ahdab, Rechdi
    Neves, Danusa O.
    Sorel, Marc
    Lefaucheur, Jean-Pascal
    Bouhassira, Didier
    [J]. PAIN, 2016, 157 (06) : 1224 - 1231
  • [6] A systematic review on reporting and assessment of adverse effects associated with transcranial direct current stimulation
    Brunoni, Andre Russowsky
    Amadera, Joao
    Berbel, Bruna
    Volz, Magdalena Sarah
    Rizzerio, Brenno Gomes
    Fregni, Felipe
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2011, 14 (08) : 1133 - 1145
  • [7] Neuroimaging of Spinal Canal Stenosis
    Cowley, Peter
    [J]. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2016, 24 (03) : 523 - +
  • [8] Trends, Major Medical Complications, and Charges Associated With Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis in Older Adults
    Deyo, Richard A.
    Mirza, Sohail K.
    Martin, Brook I.
    Kreuter, William
    Goodman, David C.
    Jarvik, Jeffrey G.
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2010, 303 (13): : 1259 - 1265
  • [9] Duruoz MT, 1999, ARTHRITIS RHEUM, V42, pS270
  • [10] Fairbank J C, 1980, Physiotherapy, V66, P271