The application of Foley catheter traction technique in extraperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy

被引:1
|
作者
Jiang, Xiao-Lu [1 ]
Ouyang, Kui [1 ]
Yang, Rui [2 ]
Sun, Jia-Ning [2 ]
Zhang, Feng [2 ]
Zhao, Hong-Wei [3 ]
机构
[1] Qingdao Univ, Med Coll, Qingdao, Shandong, Peoples R China
[2] Weifang Med Univ, Sch Clin Med, Affiliated Hosp, Weifang, Peoples R China
[3] Qingdao Univ, Dept Urol, Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hosp, 20 East Yuhuangding Rd, Yantai 264000, Shandong, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Robotic surgery; Prostate cancer; Prostatectomy; Extraperitoneal; CONTINENCE RECOVERY; METAANALYSIS; TRANSPERITONEAL; COMPLICATIONS; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1186/s12894-023-01377-5
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives To describe a technique to improve exposure of prostate during extraperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (EP-RARP).Material and methods From March 2020 to June 2022, a total of 41 patients with prior intra-abdominal surgery underwent EP-RARP. Twenty-three patients improved exposure by traction of prostate through urinary catheter. The catheter traction prostatectomy (CTP) group was compared with the standard prostatectomy (SP) group using three robotic arms (18 patients) in terms of estimated blood loss (EBL), operative time, positive surgical margin rate, the recovery rate of urinary continence, Gleason score and postoperative hospital stays. Differences were considered significant when P < 0.05.Results The operative time was lower in the CTP group (109.63 min vs. 143.20 min; P < 0.001). EBL in the CTP group was 178.26 +/- 30.70 mL, and in the standard prostatectomy group, it was 347.78 +/- 53.53 mL (P < 0.001). No significant differences with regard to postoperative hospital stay, recovery rate of urinary continence, catheterization time and positive surgical margin were observed between both groups. No intraoperative complications occurred in all the patients. After 6 months of follow-up, the Post-op Detectable prostate specific antigen was similar between the two groups.Conclusion CTP is a feasible, safe, and valid procedure in EP-RARP. Application of CTP improved the exposure of prostate, reduced operative time and blood loss in comparison with the conventional procedure.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparisons of the Perioperative, Functional, and Oncologic Outcomes After Robot-Assisted Versus Pure Extraperitoneal Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy
    Ploussard, Guillaume
    de la Taille, Alexandre
    Moulin, Morgan
    Vordos, Dimitri
    Hoznek, Andras
    Abbou, Claude-Clement
    Salomon, Laurent
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2014, 65 (03) : 610 - 619
  • [42] Comparison of Retzius-sparing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy vs standard robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a meta-analysis
    Jiang, Yu-Li
    Zheng, Gao-Feng
    Jiang, Ze-Peng
    Zhen-Li
    Zhou, Xie-Lai
    Zhou, Jin
    Ye, Chun-Hua
    Wang, Kang-Er
    BMC UROLOGY, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [43] Transperitoneal Versus Extraperitoneal Approach for Laparoscopic and Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Purnomo, Stefanus
    Hamid, Agus Rizal Ardy Hariandy
    Siregar, Moammar Andar Roemare
    Afriansyah, Andika
    Mirza, Hendy
    Seno, Doddy Hami
    Purnomo, Nugroho
    UROLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2023, 49 (05) : 285 - 292
  • [44] Comparison of the initial robot-assisted radical prostatectomy results with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
    Agreda, Fernando
    Raventos, Carles
    Planos, Jacques
    Trilla, Enrique
    Morote, Juan
    ARCHIVOS ESPANOLES DE UROLOGIA, 2014, 67 (02): : 185 - 190
  • [45] Extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal approach for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a contemporary systematic review and meta-analysis
    Uy, Michael
    Cassim, Raees
    Kim, Jaehoon
    Hoogenes, Jen
    Shayegan, Bobby
    Matsumoto, Edward D.
    JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2022, 16 (02) : 257 - 264
  • [46] Bladder rupture - a rare complication of extraperitoneal balloon dissection during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Agrawal, Vineet
    Joseph, Jean
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, 2015, 11 (04) : 395 - 399
  • [47] Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in prostate cancer
    Gandaglia, Giorgio
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
    Sun, Maxine
    FUTURE ONCOLOGY, 2015, 11 (20) : 2767 - 2773
  • [48] Robot-assisted laparoscopic total extraperitoneal hernia repair during prostatectomy: technique and initial experience
    Qazi, Hasan A. R.
    Rai, Bhavan Prasad
    Do, Minh
    Rewhorn, Matthew
    Haefner, Tim
    Liatsikos, Evangelos
    Kallidonis, Panagiotis
    Dietel, Anja
    Stolzenburg, Jens Uwe
    CENTRAL EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 68 (02) : 240 - 244
  • [49] Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Operative technique - step by step
    Ozveren, Bora
    Turkeri, Levent
    UROONKOLOJI BULTENI-BULLETIN OF UROONCOLOGY, 2013, 12 (02): : 92 - 96
  • [50] Nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with the HUGO™ robot-assisted surgery system using the 'Aalst technique'
    Paciotti, Marco
    Bravi, Carlo A.
    Mottaran, Angelo
    Nocera, Luigi
    Sarchi, Luca
    Piro, Adele
    Farinha, Rui
    Peraire Lores, Maria
    Balestrazzi, Eleonora
    Piramide, Federico
    Roussel, Eduard
    De Backer, Pieter
    D'Hondt, Frederiek
    De Naeyer, Geert
    De Groote, Ruben
    Mottrie, Alexandre
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2023, 132 (02) : 227 - 230