The application of Foley catheter traction technique in extraperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy

被引:1
作者
Jiang, Xiao-Lu [1 ]
Ouyang, Kui [1 ]
Yang, Rui [2 ]
Sun, Jia-Ning [2 ]
Zhang, Feng [2 ]
Zhao, Hong-Wei [3 ]
机构
[1] Qingdao Univ, Med Coll, Qingdao, Shandong, Peoples R China
[2] Weifang Med Univ, Sch Clin Med, Affiliated Hosp, Weifang, Peoples R China
[3] Qingdao Univ, Dept Urol, Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hosp, 20 East Yuhuangding Rd, Yantai 264000, Shandong, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Robotic surgery; Prostate cancer; Prostatectomy; Extraperitoneal; CONTINENCE RECOVERY; METAANALYSIS; TRANSPERITONEAL; COMPLICATIONS; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1186/s12894-023-01377-5
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives To describe a technique to improve exposure of prostate during extraperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (EP-RARP).Material and methods From March 2020 to June 2022, a total of 41 patients with prior intra-abdominal surgery underwent EP-RARP. Twenty-three patients improved exposure by traction of prostate through urinary catheter. The catheter traction prostatectomy (CTP) group was compared with the standard prostatectomy (SP) group using three robotic arms (18 patients) in terms of estimated blood loss (EBL), operative time, positive surgical margin rate, the recovery rate of urinary continence, Gleason score and postoperative hospital stays. Differences were considered significant when P < 0.05.Results The operative time was lower in the CTP group (109.63 min vs. 143.20 min; P < 0.001). EBL in the CTP group was 178.26 +/- 30.70 mL, and in the standard prostatectomy group, it was 347.78 +/- 53.53 mL (P < 0.001). No significant differences with regard to postoperative hospital stay, recovery rate of urinary continence, catheterization time and positive surgical margin were observed between both groups. No intraoperative complications occurred in all the patients. After 6 months of follow-up, the Post-op Detectable prostate specific antigen was similar between the two groups.Conclusion CTP is a feasible, safe, and valid procedure in EP-RARP. Application of CTP improved the exposure of prostate, reduced operative time and blood loss in comparison with the conventional procedure.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Transperitoneal versus extraperitoneal robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: A prospective single surgeon randomized comparative study [J].
Akand, Murat ;
Erdogru, Tibet ;
Avci, Egemen ;
Ates, Mutlu .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 22 (10) :916-921
[2]   Safety of Minimally Invasive Radical Prostatectomy in Patients with Prior Abdominopelvic or Inguinal Surgery [J].
Ball, Mark W. ;
Reese, Adam C. ;
Mettee, Lynda Z. ;
Pavlovich, Christian P. .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2015, 29 (02) :192-197
[3]   Robotically-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy [J].
Binder, J ;
Kramer, W .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2001, 87 (04) :408-410
[4]   The importance of anatomical reconstruction for continence recovery after robot assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and pooled analysis from referral centers [J].
Checcucci, Enrico ;
Pecoraro, Angela ;
De Cillis, Sabrina ;
Manfredi, Matteo ;
Amparore, Daniele ;
Aimar, Roberta ;
Piramide, Federico ;
Granato, Stefano ;
Volpi, Gabriele ;
Autorino, Riccardo ;
Fiori, Cristian ;
Porpiglia, Francesco .
MINERVA UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2021, 73 (02) :165-177
[5]   Comparison of Oncological Results, Functional Outcomes, and Complications for Transperitoneal Versus Extraperitoneal Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Single Surgeon's Experience [J].
Chung, Jae Seung ;
Kim, Won Tae ;
Ham, Won Sik ;
Yu, Ho Song ;
Chae, Yunbyung ;
Chung, Seok Hyun ;
Choi, Young Deuk .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2011, 25 (05) :787-792
[6]   The Clavien-Dindo Classification of Surgical Complications Five-Year Experience [J].
Clavien, Pierre A. ;
Barkun, Jeffrey ;
de Oliveira, Michelle L. ;
Vauthey, Jean Nicolas ;
Dindo, Daniel ;
Schulick, Richard D. ;
de Santibanes, Eduardo ;
Pekolj, Juan ;
Slankamenac, Ksenija ;
Bassi, Claudio ;
Graf, Rolf ;
Vonlanthen, Rene ;
Padbury, Robert ;
Cameron, John L. ;
Makuuchi, Masatoshi .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2009, 250 (02) :187-196
[7]   New Evolution of Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: A Single Center Experience with PERUSIA Technique [J].
Cochetti, Giovanni ;
Del Zingaro, Michele ;
Ciarletti, Sara ;
Paladini, Alessio ;
Felici, Graziano ;
Stivalini, Davide ;
Cellini, Valerio ;
Mearini, Ettore .
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2021, 11 (04) :1-10
[8]   Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy: 24-month outcomes from a randomised controlled study [J].
Coughlin, Geoffrey D. ;
Yaxley, John W. ;
Chambers, Suzanne K. ;
Occhipinti, Stefano ;
Samaratunga, Hema ;
Zajdlewicz, Leah ;
Teloken, Patrick ;
Dunglison, Nigel ;
Williams, Scott ;
Lavin, Martin F. ;
Gardiner, Robert A. .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2018, 19 (08) :1051-1060
[9]   Evaluation of surgical site infection in mini-invasive urological surgery [J].
de Vermandois, Jacopo Adolfo Rossi ;
Cochetti, Giovanni ;
Del Zingaro, Michele ;
Santoro, Alberto ;
Panciarola, Mattia ;
Boni, Andrea ;
Marsico, Matteo ;
Gaudio, Gianluca ;
Paladini, Alessio ;
Guiggi, Paolo ;
Cirocchi, Roberto ;
Mearini, Ettore .
OPEN MEDICINE, 2019, 14 (01) :711-718
[10]   Use of fourth arm in da Vinci robot-assisted extraperitoneal laparoscopic prostatectomy: Novel technique [J].
Esposito, MP ;
Ilbeigi, P ;
Ahmed, M ;
Lanteri, V .
UROLOGY, 2005, 66 (03) :649-652