Should we be screening for COPD? - looking through the lens of lung cancer screening

被引:1
|
作者
Young, Robert P. [1 ,2 ]
Scott, Raewyn J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Auckland, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Auckland, New Zealand
[2] Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Resp Res Grp, Auckland 1344, New Zealand
关键词
Spirometry; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; lung cancer screening; airflow limitation; chronic bronchitis; mortality; OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY-DISEASE; RATIO IMPAIRED SPIROMETRY; CHRONIC-BRONCHITIS; MUCIN MUC5AC; SURVIVAL; IMPACT; INDIVIDUALS; TRIAL; COMORBIDITIES; ASSOCIATION;
D O I
10.1080/17476348.2023.2259800
中图分类号
R56 [呼吸系及胸部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
IntroductionIn May 2022, the US Preventive Services Task Force published their recommendation against screening for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in asymptomatic adults. However, we argue the routine use of spirometry in both asymptomatic and symptomatic high-risk smokers has utility.Areas coveredWe provide published and unpublished observations from a secondary analyses of the American College of Radiology Imaging Network (ACRIN), arm of the National Lung Screening Trial, including 18,463 high-risk current or former smokers who underwent pre-bronchodilator spirometry at baseline. According to history alone, 20% reported a prior diagnosis of 'COPD,' although only 11% (about one half), actually had airflow limitation (Diagnosed COPD) and 9% had Global Initiative for Obstructive Pulmonary Disease GOLD 0 Pre-COPD. Of the remaining 80% of 'asymptomatic' screening participants, 23% had airflow limitation (Screen-detected COPD) and 13% had preserved ratio impaired spirometry (PRISm). This means 45% of this high-risk cohort were reclassified by spirometry, and together with comorbid disease, identified subgroups where lung cancer screening efficacy could be optimized by between 2-6 fold.Expert opinionOur preliminary findings suggest lung cancer screening outcomes vary according to 'new' COPD-related spirometric-defined subgroups and that screening spirometry, together with comorbid disease, identifies those for whom lung cancer screening is mostly beneficial or potentially harmful.
引用
收藏
页码:753 / 771
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Lung function impairment in lung cancer screening: discordance between risk and screening outcomes when looking through a PRISm
    Young, Robert P.
    Scott, Raewyn J.
    Gamble, Greg D.
    TRANSLATIONAL LUNG CANCER RESEARCH, 2022, 11 (10) : 1988 - 1994
  • [2] Lung function impairment in lung cancer screening: discordance between risk and screening outcomes when looking through a PRISm
    Young, Robert P.
    Scott, Raewyn J.
    Gamble, Greg D.
    TRANSLATIONAL LUNG CANCER RESEARCH, 2022,
  • [3] Lung cancer screening - are we there yet?
    Warner, Eiran
    Jotkowitz, Alan
    Maimon, Nimrod
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2010, 21 (01) : 6 - 11
  • [4] Lung Cancer Screening in Patients with COPD-A Case Report
    Amirahmadi, Roxana
    Kumar, Avnee J.
    Cowan, Mark
    Deepak, Janaki
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2019, 55 (07):
  • [5] COPD phenotypes in a lung cancer screening population
    Balkan, Arzu
    Bulut, Yonca
    Fuhrman, Carl R.
    Fisher, Stephen N.
    Wilson, David O.
    Weissfeld, Joel L.
    Sciurba, Frank C.
    CLINICAL RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2016, 10 (01) : 48 - 53
  • [6] Screening for Lung Cancer Who Should Be Screened?
    Jett, James
    ARCHIVES OF PATHOLOGY & LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2012, 136 (12) : 1511 - 1514
  • [7] Lung cancer screening: Should we be excluding people with previous malignancy?
    Cherie P Erkmen
    Larry R Kaiser
    Ashley L Ehret
    World Journal of Respirology, 2016, 6 (01) : 1 - 13
  • [8] Is an effective screening for lung cancer possible in COPD? Pro
    Collodoro, Angelo
    Mezzasalma, Fabrizio
    MULTIDISCIPLINARY RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2009, 4 (05) : 361 - 367
  • [9] Lung cancer screening - risk stratification. Who should undergo screening?
    Beer, L.
    Prosch, H.
    RADIOLOGE, 2016, 56 (09): : 798 - 802
  • [10] Screening for lung cancer
    Sateia, Heather F.
    Choi, Youngjee
    Stewart, Rosalyn W.
    Peairs, Kimberly S.
    SEMINARS IN ONCOLOGY, 2017, 44 (01) : 74 - 82